Posted on

Hard Proof That The Radiology Core Examination Does Not Work! Need We Say More?

radiology core examination

I can still remember these words, “All you need to do is to study and attend your rotations. If so, you will pass the core radiology examination.” And also, “Residents should not need additional time off to study for the test. They get all the time they need.” Lawrence Davis, MD, the former head of the Radiology Review Committee (RRC), stated these comments with confidence at an Association of University Radiologists (AUR) meeting a few years back. According to the recent article in Aunt Minnie, ARRS: Residents who passed Core Exam valued test prep; nothing could be farther from the truth.

Here is a direct quote from the article, “survey respondents who passed the Core Exam and got a higher overall score used a greater number of test-prep resources, had more time off to study, and had higher U.S. Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 scores (240 versus 221) compared with residents who scored lower or failed.”

Based on this new information, this group entirely invalidated the former RRC head thoughts in one fell swoop. Furthermore, the data stands directly against the ABR mission to create an exam to test basic competency. Now, the evidence to support my theory in a previous article about the new test is live and “in the flesh.”

But, I am going to take it one step further. The results of this new study signals that the ABR needs to revamp the entire radiology core examination once and for all. And, let me tell you why.

The Core Radiology Examination Is Not Based On Practical Knowledge

One of the stated goals of the ABR is to demonstrate competency of recent radiology graduates. But, how can the ABR test those stated goals if the core exam performance depends on residents needing more study time? All the knowledge that they need should come from day-to-day studying and working alone, not from taking additional time off to study.

Additionally, a medical career examination should test for baseline competency, not test-taking skills or superfluous facts. If you need to buy all these supportive test-prep resources, then you are testing for more than baseline competency. In reality, you are checking for skills outside of the purview of radiology, the ability to take a test. Who do you want to hire a good quality worker/radiologist or a great test-taker?

We Are Supporting The Test Taking Support Companies At The Residents Expense

Once again, the resident is an afterthought when it comes to all the fees that we make them pay. The typical resident has to shell out thousands of dollars to the ABR. And then, the ABR forces upon them the indignity of paying for additional test prep resources on top of everything else. Whether it is books, courses, online question banks, or index cards, each dollar spent on these resources adds to the enormous debt of the typical radiology resident. When are they going to start thinking about the needs of radiology residents?

Now, there are traditional resources such as subspecialty books that residents can and probably should buy. But, are we helping residents by having them pay for the additional resources to pass a test that does not measure what the ABR intends. Who finally wins out in the end? Well, the test taking companies, of course. They earn hundreds of thousands of dollars on the backs of indebted radiology residents.

Let’s Stop Playing Games Once And For All!

The ABR needs to stop deluding themselves that the core exam serves the purpose that the organization had expected. The evidence against the utility of the test is now officially on the table. Let’s now start the process of creating a new examination that works as intended. Back to the drawing board, folks!

 

 

Posted on

Can You Pass The 2018 Saint Barnabas Precall Quiz?

Due to the popularity of last year’s precall quiz post, I am back at it again. Today, I am posting 10 cases from the real 2018 quiz that we used to ensure our residents are ready prior to beginning call. Of course, we used our PACS system to see if they could not only understand the disease entities but also make the findings as well. Unfortunately, you will not have the same option. However, these cases will help to benchmark where you may stand.

When you go through the test, come up with the findings, diagnosis, and if asked/relevant, management. In order to see how you did, answers are at the bottom of this page. (Don’t peek until you are finished!) One more thing… in order to pass the test without conditioning, you need to get at least 70 percent right. Enjoy!

Precall Quiz

Case 1

 

Case 2

 

 

Case 3

 

 

How would you manage this case?

Case 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 5

 

What questions do you need to ask?

How do you manage this case?

 

Case 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 7

part A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st film- 2 years ago

2nd film- today

What is the differential diagnosis?

What do you want to do next?

 

part B

 

 

 

Case 8

 

 

 

 

Case 9

 

 

 

Case 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answers:

Case 1:

Right thalamic/basal ganglia intraparenchymal bleed with intraventricular extension.

Accompanying early transtentorial herniation. (needs to be mentioned for full credit!)

Case 2:

Right-sided pyelonephritis/early abscess formation. Renal mass/neoplasm can be within differential diagnosis.

Case 3:

Aortic dissection extending from the inferior thoracic cavity to iliac arteries.

Accompanying perivascular fluid and effusion- possibly blood products, consider ruptured dissection

For full credit-need to mention that you would call the vascular surgeons

Case 4:

Ultrasound appendicitis with appendicoliths

Case 5:

You need to ask history. (?B-HCG positive)

Ruptured ectopic pregnancy.

Case 6:

Homolateral Lisfranc fracture dislocation

Case 7:

Part A

New prominent bilateral hila- Interval development of adenopathy or pulmonary arterial hypertension

CT of the chest recommended for further characterization.

Part B

Bilateral chronic pulmonary emboli with pulmonary hypertension

Case 8:

Acute biliary leak with extraluminal radiopharmaceutical.

Focus within the hepatic hila- most likely biloma/origin of the biliary leak

Case 9:

Distal left ureteral stone with left renal hydronephrosis and hydroureter. Accompanying inflammatory change at the left kidney and ureter.

Case 10:

No acute disease. Possible recently ruptured left ovarian cyst.

 

 

Posted on

How Should The ABR Test Communication Skills?

ABR

How should the ABR test communication skills? Isn’t that up to the residency programs? The ACGME maintains six core competencies. Only 1 of those 6 (medical knowledge) can be tested by board exams. Others, like professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills, cannot.

Anonymous Attending

 

———————————————

 

 

Great Question!

Testing Communication Skills

I believe testing and standardizing some basic communication skills before graduation is necessary. Currently, there is significant variability in the quality of communication teachings in different residencies. We certainly don’t want to create new graduates of residency programs who don’t feel comfortable relaying information expeditiously to clinicians or dictating a case. To that end, there are many ways that the ABR could test communication skills.

First, the resident may be able to answer questions in an appropriate dictation format to demonstrate they understand the mechanics of dictation. (At least that would ensure that graduating residents understand the basics.) Grading would be a bit more challenging, but there is no reason why the ABR cannot create such a scheme for a grading system. Second, the previous oral boards, albeit imperfect, did test residents’ ability to communicate the examination, the findings, the impression/differential, and management.

So, to say that ABR can’t test communication skills does not make sense. I’m sure we could develop a new and improved oral board type of examination to test the skill of communicating radiological findings to clinicians and patients in a much-improved way. Perhaps we could create a part 2 to the core examination. If the USMLE examination can do it, why can’t the ABR test for the same things but direct it toward the needs of radiologists?

Professionalism

I agree that testing professionalism is a more challenging nut to crack. Furthermore, unlike communication, professionalism is not a skill set but a way of acting ethically within the profession. You can’t standardize minimum requirements for professionalism in a test format. As you hinted, let’s leave that to the individual programs. But you can undoubtedly standardize essential minimum competencies for communication skills. And I think that should be the responsibility of the ABR if they want to establish the minimum abilities of a graduating radiology resident.

Final Thoughts

I believe we create excuses for ourselves to say it is impossible to test communication skills. It is certainly possible, and if other professions can do it, radiology can do it, too. To say that it is impossible or too hard is just pure laziness. It would just take time, rededication of funds, and getting together some intelligent radiologists and educators to figure it out. If called upon, I would be happy to give my input!!!

Director1