Tag: radiology

Posted on by

The Alphabet Soup Of Residency Visas And The Radiology Alternate Pathway: A Guide For The Foreign Radiology Residency Applicant

Due to increasing governmental bureaucracy, static to slightly increasing numbers of residency slots, and increasing numbers of American medical student positions applying for residencies, it has become harder than ever to get a residency slot as a foreign medical student in the United States (1). That is not to say it is impossible to get one, but rather it is just significantly more difficult. Even though this is the case, since a large proportion of my readers are from foreign countries (approximately 1/3) and are interested in the mechanics of obtaining a radiology residency in the United States, I have decided to create a post about the world of visas and the radiology alternate pathway for ABR certification. Hopefully, this will be of some assistance to those of you with competitive applications and a burning desire to come to the United States for training. Also, I think it is informative and interesting for the United States residency applicant and radiology resident to understand what the additional requirements are for those that are applying from foreign countries.

In order to organize this post, I am dividing it into two sections. The first section will talk about the different types of visas with an emphasis on J-1 visas since this is the usual pathway that most foreign residents take to get a residency in this country.  I will also briefly mention J-2 visas and go through some relevant information about H-1B visas and green cards/permanent resident status. The second part of this post will talk about the alternate pathway specific to radiology and what requirements are needed to satisfy the ABR if you have some foreign radiology experience and are considering not going through a standard four-year residency. Finally, I would also like to give a special thanks to Debbie Paciga, our graduate medical education secretary, who was nice enough to take the time to share her vast knowledge on the topic of visas after many years of experience with numerous entering and graduating residents. Without her help, I could not have written this article!

Visas

J-1 Visas

A J-1 Visa is the most common type of Visa used by non-immigrant status foreigners for completing a residency program in the United States. Essentially, the J-1 Visa is an exchange visitor program for trainees from foreign countries. So, it is not expected that the J-1 Visa holder will become a permanent resident or citizen of the United States, but rather that the holder will be here for the limited time period of training.

Once the foreign graduate student has met the requirements of the ECFMG (Educational Commission For Foreign Medical Graduates), he/she can apply through the online system called The Physician Applicant System Access (OASIS) to obtain a J-1 Visa. However, the J-1 Visa requires a hospital sponsor in order to complete the application. The liaison between the teaching hospital and the ECFMG is called the Training Program Liaison (TPL) and this person accomplishes much of the work needed to obtain the J-1 sponsor. Typically, this person is a secretary or administrator whose responsibility it is to make sure that all the appropriate paperwork is submitted. This assigned person uses a system called The Training Program Liaison System Access (EVNet) on the EFCMG website to manage the application for the foreign graduate. Therefore, as a foreign graduate, you need to make sure that you are in constant contact with this person in order to complete all the necessary requirements for the J-1 Visa so that all the appropriate paperwork is submitted to this EVNet system.

So, what are some of the items that need to be submitted to obtain the J-1 Visa? You need to have a passport, a passport biography page, a curriculum vitae, a signed contract by the hospital and graduate student/resident with all the necessary information, the appropriate online filled-out forms (including the DS-2019 form- a form submitted by the sponsor), and of course all of the fees. Also, just as important, if you have a family that needs to travel to the country of the residency, you need to make sure that they have submitted a J-2 Visa which also needs to be approved by the sponsoring institution.

But alas, obtaining the J-1 Visa is not so simple as this… (It could never be that easy when it comes to anything that has to do with the State Department!) Each country has its own requirements for the applicant to be able to apply for a United States graduate education program. In fact, some countries have significantly limited the availability of these J-1 Visas. Each foreign applicant needs to obtain a statement of need from their home country embassy in order to be able to apply for the J-1 Visa. Some countries have severely curtailed the numbers of statements of need in order to prevent applicants from leaving their home country. The purpose of limiting the numbers at these particular countries is usually due to a lack of expertise or increased numbers of physicians needed in the applicant’s home country. These countries do not want applicants to leave their home country and emigrate to the United States but rather want them to train and practice medicine in their home country overseas. Currently, some countries that limit the numbers of applicants the most to obtain a medical residency training J-1 Visa include South Korea, Sweden, and Canada. Then, there are countries such as India and Pakistan that tend to issue as many statements of need as warranted. Of course, this is a moving target and can change from year to year depending on a country’s needs.

Other Miscellaneous Requirements And Issues For The J-1 Visa Holder

Once the J-1 Visa is obtained, there are numerous other requirements that the J-1 Visa holder needs to be aware of. For instance, the J-1 Visa holder cannot arrive into the country more than 30 days prior to beginning their residency. Sometimes, this can be a difficult issue since there is such a rush to get everything the applicant needs ready prior to beginning residency (housing, etc.).

Other recurrent issues include updating the J-1 Visa on a yearly basis with a new signed contract, obtaining recurrent statements of need from the home country of origin (sometimes the statements of need are time limited for less than the time of the residency program), and making sure to bring all the necessary documents when entering and leaving the country (up-to-date passports, diplomas, and so on…)

Applicants also need to beware of the legal system within the United States. The state department tracks illegal activities for residents with J-1 Visas on a yearly basis. Any conflict with the law can be a potential reason for the applicant to be sent back to his/her home country.

Finally, it is important to recognize that a research J-1 Visa is not the same as a J-1 Visa for a clinical residency. So, if you are a foreign national applying for a residency program, you need to obtain an entirely new J-1 Visa in order to start the program. (Whew, that’s a lot of stuff to remember!!!)

H-1B Visas

So, what exactly is a H-1B Visa and how does it work for the residency applicant? An H1-B Visa implies that you are going to be working in a specialty field/occupation that has a need for a foreign worker that cannot be met by a United States resident. The H1-B visa holder is permitted to stay in the country indefinitely, different from the J-1 Visa holder.

Typically, the hospital needs to sponsor an H-1B Visa for an applicant in order to get the foreign graduate into one of its residency programs. In addition, the number of H-1B Visas is capped each year, making it more difficult to obtain one. It often costs the sponsoring hospital thousands of dollars to work on an H1-B Visa due to the necessary legal and processing fees. So, for these reasons, an H1-B Visa is an uncommon route for the foreign radiology resident applicant. At our institution, it has been only used for exceptional circumstances. One example would be an applicant that is already in a program in the institution but cannot get a J-1 Visa because this person has a D.O. degree and is from Canada. (Apparently a D.O degree does not qualify for the J-1 Visa pathway). Since it is a rarely used method for foreign applicants to obtain a radiology residency, I am going to limit discussion on this topic

Green Card/Permanent Resident Status

Finally, the goal of some foreign resident applicants is to declare permanent residency within the United States in order to remain within the country with a full time radiologist position and with the possibility of eventually becoming a citizen. The United States lists several mechanisms of obtaining a Green Card including via job offers, investing in enterprises, and self-petition (typically an individual of extraordinary ability). Many applicants will often get their green card once they have graduated from a residency program and have been accepted for a permanent radiologist position in the United States. At that point, the employer is required to file a petition for the employee so that he/she can undergo the application process and the applicant needs fill out the appropriate paperwork. Usually, this process occurs only after the J-1 Visa is no longer active.

One other pathway to obtaining green card status includes finding a position in an underserved area for a period of time, usually 5 years. This applies to not only primary care physicians, but also specialists as well. But again, it is usually completed after the radiology residency has ended.

The Radiology Alternate Pathway

In a past response to a question from a potential foreign applicant in the “Ask The Residency Director” section of this site about the alternate pathway, I briefly went over some of the requirements for the foreign radiology applicant to obtain ABR certification. The question asked about applying outside the typical route of a four-year qualified ACGME radiology residency based upon the applicant’s previous radiology experiences. This process is called the Radiology Alternate Pathway. According to the ABR policy, the applicant can satisfy the requirements only at institutions with an ACGME-accredited radiology residency-training program. The applicant needs to have 4 years of continuous work in the capacity of a “resident, ACGME accredited fellowship, non-ACGME accredited fellowship, or faculty member”.  In addition, the candidate must also have “4 months of clinical nuclear medicine training.” The nuclear medicine training needs to be dedicated although the applicant can get the training at an affiliated institution if that is available.

The challenge for the foreign radiology applicant is to find a program that is willing to recognize previous foreign training and accept him/her for a slot in one or more of these programs over a four-year period. Many programs are not willing to make an obligation of four years of employment in a mixture of residency, fellowship, or faculty positions and will require the applicant to go down the standard pathway of radiology residency. That is not to say it is impossible. But rather, it is not common and represents the exception rather than the rule.

Final Thoughts

Applying to radiology residency and performing well in a radiology residency program as a United States citizen without having to contend with the issues that arise from migrating to a new country can be challenging by itself. I can only imagine the additional difficulties that foreign applicants face applying to and attending radiology programs within the United States. There are certainly numerous hurdles and hoops for these applicants. But for those with the desire, ability, and grit/determination, it is still certainly possible to go through the process of getting a visa and obtaining a qualified residency spot or spot in an alternate pathway program. If this is your life’s desire, don’t let these hardships dissuade you!!!

Helpful Websites For The Foreign Medical Graduate

ABR Alternate Pathway Information- https://www.theabr.org/sites/all/themes/abr-media/pdf/PWIMG_DRandSubCert.pdf

ECFMG –   http://www.ecfmg.org/evsp/application-online.html

Governmental Green Card Website Information-  https://www.uscis.gov/greencard

Governmental J-1 Visa Website Information-  https://j1visa.state.gov/basics/common-questions/

Governmental J-2 Visa Website Information- https://j1visa.state.gov/basics/j2-visa/

Governmental H-1B Website Information-  https://www.uscis.gov/eir/visa-guide/h-1b-specialty-occupation/understanding-h-1b-requirements

 

Posted on by — 4 Comments

What Clinicians Don’t Want From A Radiologist- The 8 Deadly Sins

clinicians

A few months ago, one of my readers sent me the following message, “I would like you to write about what clinicians want from a radiologist.” That comment initiated some thoughts about the topic since our primary goal, as radiologists, is to answer the clinician’s questions. But let’s take this idea from a different angle. At some point in our careers, we all have made cardinal mistakes that turn off our referring clinicians. What is more interesting than the mistakes that most of us have made in our career to teach us lessons about how we can avoid angering our referring physicians and make things right for them? So, let’s talk about what clinicians don’t want from a radiologist! (The negative tends to be more interesting than the positive!) Let’s give this a whirl…

The Forced Hand

In training and board examinations, our instructors tell us to write recommendations for further management. So, how bad could it be to recommend a biopsy for a thyroid nodule when you see a new one? An angry head and neck surgeon stomps up to the department and looks for you. He yells loudly, “Why are you telling me what to do with my patient. He should not be getting a biopsy in this condition!!!” Bzzzzzzzz… (Buzzer sound)

Pretty darn bad! When you write a recommendation, you have to remember that you often don’t have the full picture of the patient’s situation. In other words, there is an asymmetry of information between the clinician, the radiologist, and the patient. Maybe, the patient can’t lie flat. Perhaps, the patient can’t handle needles. Possibly, the clinician knows about an outside study that you don’t. Or, the clinician is privy to some other issue that you cannot imagine. By recommending a biopsy of a thyroid nodule without a caveat, for instance, you are legally forcing the clinician into having to investigate it further. In contrast, it may not be the correct management protocol for the patient. I have learned to be very gentle with my management recommendations over the years!!! Always leave the clinician a way out…

Indecisiveness

We write a list of 10 items in our differential diagnosis without additional comment- like a laundry list to give a “complete differential.” Days later, you get a phone call from the clinician- “I don’t understand what you are saying- what do you think is going on here?”

How can we avoid this scenario? If you have an extensive differential diagnosis, always state what you think is most likely and why. Avoid delving too far into the 1 in a million diagnosis unless you have a real sneaking suspicion it might be the correct one. Clinicians appreciate when you make your best guess since it often will steer the doctor down the right path. Too much information without direction can be harmful!

The Saucy Radiology Report

You are angry that the referring physician did an inappropriate workup on a patient performing iodine scan as the first test in a workup for a palpable thyroid nodule. In contrast, you know that it should be a thyroid ultrasound instead, so you put in your report the following statement, Make sure to order the ultrasound instead of a thyroid scan in patients with a palpable lump. The doctor comes storming in, “How dare you to talk to me like this in your report. It is a legal document!”

If you have an issue with a clinician, make sure to air your dirty laundry outside of the report. The clinician is correct. You are putting the physician in a potential situation with legal liability. This sort of comment does not belong anywhere inside the report.

The Discrepant Report

You dictate a case from the night before when the overnight resident was on call. In the morning, you find a pulmonary embolus, but you do not look at the additional documentation from the resident or the nighthawk. You do not call the doctors to let them know. Later in the day, the ER doctor walks up to the emergency department and says, “What the hell is going on here?” It turns out the overnight doctors did not call the study positive and sent the patient home. You didn’t notify the doctor!

Discrepant reports between you and other physicians can cause negligent patient care. Be sure to check all the information to make sure that all parties are on the same page. Discrepancies will occur. But make sure to notify all parties!!!

Is It Better, Worse, Or Unchanged?

You are following a patient with breast cancer on a CT scan, and you proudly discover and then mention a subtle liver lesion in your report. Next, you refer to the prior study, but don’t look at it. You also do not document the size of the lesions, nor compare the size of the abnormalities to the previous study. Two days later, you get a phone call from the oncologist, “What is going with my patient? I need to know if I have to change chemotherapy. Are the hepatic masses changed?”

Clinicians always want to know if their patient is improving, unchanged, or progressively worsening. These imaging issues often change clinical management and are of the utmost importance to the clinician. Always make sure to put these findings under the impression of your report!!!

Incomprehensibility

You look at a pelvic MRI on a patient with fibroids. The fibroids seem to be growing over time. However, you don’t check the report and click the sign off button. Before you know it, the dictation goes out to the clinician. Three days later you get a phone call from the doctor, “It says here in the body of the report that there is interval enlargement and in the impression, there is no interval enlargement of the fibroids. Which one is correct?”

Make sure to check for grammatical and logical statements within a completed dictation before signing it off. Very few things piss off a clinician more than having them read an incomprehensible report. An unclear story leads the clinicians down this pathway. Always check your work!!!

The Wrong Diagnosis

You are looking at a hand x-ray with a type of arthritis that you have not seen before. Finally, you decide to dictate the case without confirming the diagnosis via Google or running it by another clinician. You call it osteoarthritis. The patient gets treated based on your report. One year later, the patient is still not getting better, and the doctor sends a new film to another one of your colleagues. He comes up to you later in the day and states, “you dictated a case and called it osteoarthritis. It was a definite case of gout!!!”

If you are not sure about a diagnosis, always make sure to either look it up or run it by someone else. We are in the business of healing others. You should never have too much pride to make guesses when you can get the correct answer!!!

Not Answering The Clinical Question

You dictate a plain film of the chest, and you happen to see a lytic lesion in the middle of the thoracic spine and a pulmonary nodule in the right lower lobe. So, you put in your impression- MRI of the thoracic spine recommended for further characterization. 8 mm right lower lobe pulmonary nodule. A few days later, you get a phone call from the physician- “We already know about the bony lesion, and it is a known hemangioma as seen in previous studies. The history said to compare the lung nodule with the prior study. Please take a look at that!”

It is imperative to scour the history for whatever clinical question the clinician wants you to answer. This way, you can provide a helpful answer to improve patient care. That is the main reason we are here as radiologists!

The Eight Deadly Sins- Lessons Learned

As clinicians, we always need to self-reflect to improve our practice of medicine. There is no room for too much pride. We should continuously look for ways to improve our clinical skills, reports, and communications with our colleagues. I have just given you eight different examples of issues that can arise if you want to cut corners. You can easily avoid further carnage with your reputation, your patients, and your colleagues by remembering these situations. Use these examples as a template to prevent the eight deadly sins of a radiologist!

 

 

 

 

Posted on by

Has Technology Ruined Your Chance Of Employment In Radiology?

Has Technology Ruined Your Chances of Employment in Radiology?

Among the many benefits of living in the Computer Age are the rapid technological advancements that continue to bring convenience and joy to our daily lives. From handheld devices with 24/7 internet access to cars that drive themselves, the future many hoped for (and dreamed of) is happening right now. But while the positive aspects of new technologies mostly outweigh the negatives, disruptive change naturally creates both winners and losers, particularly on the employment front. The medical field is not immune to this phenomenon.

In the recent past, victims of technological encroachment tended to be lower skilled workers whose roles could be easily automated. Today however, potential job automation targets include professionals in high-skill fields ranging from law to engineering to medicine. In short, automation is now “blind to the color of your collar”, according to Jerry Kaplan, author of “Humans Need Not Apply”, (https://www.amazon.com/Humans-Need-Not-Apply-Intelligence/dp/0300213557) a sobering book that sheds light on the uncertain future facing modern workforces.

All of this is a roundabout way of asking a very uncomfortable question: Are robots coming for your radiology job?

The short answer is no…but don’t let your guard down. Here’s why.

Today the poster child of artificial intelligence (AI), IBM’s “Watson”, can already find clots in pulmonary arteries. And unlike a busy radiologist who might read 20,000 or so studies per year, Watson is on target to review 30 billion medical images (http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/863127) It goes without saying that Watson’s only going to get better.

What’s more, a number of Silicon Valley startups are currently applying new technologies to automate and improve the delivery of medicine. One firm in particular, Enlitic, is even developing a deep-learning system that uses AI to analyze X-ray and CT scans. According to an article in the Economist, (http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21700758-will-smarter-machines-cause-mass-unemployment-automation-and-anxiety) Enlitic’s system has performed 50% better in tests than a group of three expert radiologists at classifying malignant tumors. When used to examine X-rays, their deep-learning system also significantly outperformed human experts. Of course, this emerging technology leaves much to be desired in the bedside manner department, but that’s what robot doctors (http://www.techtimes.com/articles/131870/20160209/will-robots-in-healthcare-make-doctors-obsolete.htm) are for.

Now before you go and trade your radiology degree for a barista outfit, consider the fact that according to most experts, including the CEO of Elitic himself (Igor Barani, MD, a radiation oncologist), artificial intelligence and radiologists aren’t diametrically opposed. In fact, they’re largely symbiotic. By design, AI will increasingly free radiologists from mundane tasks that can be automated, like reviewing CT scans for lung nodules. As Barani puts it, “tasks that can be automated should be given to the machine—not as surrender but secession.” This outlook portends a future in which radiologists are increasingly empowered to deliver better patient care, not supplanted by robotic overlords.

Regardless of what technology naysayers say, there will always be radiology careers for talented individuals (http://scpmgphysiciancareers.com/) to pursue. That being said, the role of radiologists will almost certainly narrow in the coming years and decades to one of inference, not detection — and that’s an important takeaway. With little doubt, the medical field will require fewer radiologists per capita because of deep learning technologies that simply do a better job of identifying anomalies. The successful radiologists of tomorrow will be the ones who can reduce AI-generated data into useful information that helps patients get better, faster. That’s not a future to be scared of; it’s one all current and prospective radiologists should eagerly anticipate.

Posted on by — 2 Comments

Reading Room Background Music- A Hazard For Patient Care?

music

Walk into any radiology reading room, and you may see several radiologists with headphones plugged into iPhone music. Others are constantly shushing other residents, chatting amongst themselves in the reading room. These rads hate the moment that excess noise comes their way. This divergence of opinions on the matter is enormous. So, should we concentrate solely on the findings on the film and ban all music/noise from the reading room? Or, does music help radiologists to notice things they may have not as seen otherwise? Let’s look at several relevant articles and weigh the body of evidence to come up with a conclusion.

Music As Potential Benefactor In The Radiology Department

Mood

As I was combing through the internet, I came across several interesting positive articles on noise and productivity. However, overall, the scientific power of the studies was pretty weak. One particular study emphasized radiologists, and it was an interesting article in Science Daily. It summarized an American Roentgen Ray Society abstract. The study took eight radiologists and looked at how baroque, classical music affects mood, concentration, perceived diagnostic accuracy, and work satisfaction. It concluded that the most statistically significant positive effects were upon mood and work satisfaction. One physician even stated that there was a subjective improvement in concentration and interpretative abilities. However, it had a low number of included participants and didn’t look at the actual performance of the radiologists. So, I’m not sure if the results are that relevant.

Performance

One abstract in the literature with a slightly higher number of participants (26 radiologists) looked at acoustic noise within clinical departments and radiology performance. This study concluded that acoustic noise found in most radiology departments is not a distraction from work. However, this is not a direct study about music and reading films. Although a small study, the paper suggests no harm in listening to music and reading chest images.

Another article went through different types of music that are best for immersive tasks but are not specific to radiology. I think you can extrapolate these genres to radiology because radiology reading rooms are an immersive environment. Interestingly, it listed baroque, classical, electronic, video games, and low-volume ambient music as the most helpful. Nevertheless, the scientific literature did not back it up. 

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America released a paper stating that natural sounds may “enhance cognitive functioning, ability to concentrate, and increase worker satisfaction.” I didn’t see the data behind the study, but it would be interesting to arrive at a reading room that sounds like a waterfall or a windy day. That could make me a bit more efficient and relaxed… But perhaps a bit sleepy as well!

A Case Report About Music And Performance

Nototallyrad.blogspot.com had an interesting expose on reading ICU chest films where he spoke specifically about his productivity based on different types of music in an unscientific format. He concluded that he was most efficient when listening to Bach instead of Metallica, White Noise, and Red Stick Ramblers! Call me crazy. But, if I listened to Metallica while reading anything, not only would I have a difficult time reading cases, I may come home with a headache!!!

Music As A Disruptor of Radiologist Concentration

Much of the literature regarding noise/music and adverse effects upon performance is not specific to the radiologist. These articles tend to be a bit more powerful but are certainly not complete. We can try to extrapolate from these articles the relevance to the radiologist. Specifically, if you look at the psychological literature, several negative articles reported on the radiologist regarding noise, music, and performance.

Performance Deterioration

The first one, The Impact of Listening to Music on Cognitive Performance, supported that performance scores were higher in silence than in all types of music conditions. That performance deteriorated as the intensity of the music increased. The kind of music did not affect performance, just the intensity of the music. Again, the sample size was not that large. And other biases were present that could alter the applicability of the results.

Another psychologically-based article called The Effect of Background Music and Background Noise on the Task Performance of Introverts and Extroverts looked at 10 participants and the effect of music with high arousal potential and negative affect, music with low arousal potential and positive affect, and everyday noise on cognitive task performance of introverts and extraverts. Similar to the previous study, performance was worse with background noise compared to silence. There was also differing performance among introverts and extraverts (I’m not sure how relevant that part would be toward radiologists!)

Outside of the psychological literature, a sociological study looked at the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Although not specific to music, it had a significantly higher number of participants (1839 surveys). Moreover, it could potentially be relevant to the radiologist. The result was that multitasking with social media and academics could lead to a lower GPA. Although there is no direct link in this article between listening to music and radiologist performance, one can conclude that music is multitasking and can just as well interfere with radiology performance.

The Lone Radiology Resident Study- A Mixed Result

Finally, there was an article explicitly dedicated to the radiology resident! It specifically looked at resident detection of rib fractures. They divided eight radiology resident readers into two groups- one accustomed to reading in quiet environments and another group that reported to be unaffected by noise. It turned out that the resident’s attitude toward noise affected the detection of rib fractures. Those residents who usually read in silence had improved performance in silence, and those unaffected by noise had improved performance with noise. Again, not such a robust study, but interesting nonetheless.

So What Is The Preponderance Of Evidence?

Although the higher power studies currently lean toward music as an overall detractor of potential radiologist performance, there are no strict guidelines in either direction. You can still make an argument in some cases that music can help some radiologists get through the day in a better mood if nothing else. However, until there is some more substantial evidence that music has no effect or improved effect upon radiology reads, read films with music at your peril!

 

Posted on by

How To Combat A Difficult Radiology Job Market!

job market

Once again, like in many other economic cycles, the radiology job market has hit a bit of a pause. This time, it is due to Covid-19. Although the job market is not as bad as it was back around 2010, it certainly is not the same as it was at the beginning of this year. And, in many locales, the job market froze up entirely. Competition remains fierce in desirable practices on the east and west coasts. Even with some folks abandoning the cities for the more suburban and rural areas, you will likely find it very difficult to obtain a partnership position in San Fransisco or Manhattan!!!

How do you, as a graduating radiology resident or fellow, begin to approach finding a job in this competitive landscape? We are going to cover the essentials for finding a quality job in these problematic radiology markets. I will divide the essentials into the following sections: networking, diversification of skills, location, recommendations, and research/national organization involvement.

Networking, Networking, Networking!!!

Maintain Relationships At Home

Networking does not only begin when you start looking for a job. The search for the ideal job commences at home. What do I mean by that? The first and most important part of networking is maintaining good relationships with your colleagues and attendings.

Many attendings have their proverbial “ear to the ground.” More often than not, therefore, many can tell you about opportunities in the area. Moreover, they can guide you to those jobs. So, to get access to these high-quality jobs, you need to perform and be a good team player. The resident that has not been “playing nicely in the sandbox” during training will not receive those inside tips. More likely, the poorly behaved resident will need to fend for himself. On the other hand, residents who continuously strive for excellence and relate well to their colleagues will have first dibs on those desirable jobs with connections to your radiology attendings.

Keep In Touch

It also becomes more critical than ever to stay in contact with your colleagues and coworkers. When you are ready to leave your residency to go to your fellowship, keep in touch with your former colleagues, residents, and attendings. You never know when that next job lead is going to pop up. And, most former colleagues will happily give you a tip for a new contact. These connections will be the most likely to help with finding that next great job.

What about social media? Nowadays, professional-based social media groups such as LinkedIn can play a role in getting that next job. Besides, social media can keep you in contact with your former colleagues. And, social media allows you to let others stay aware of your current training and expertise. Therefore, residents should maintain at least one account. But be careful to keep the account relevant and correct. View it as a resume. If it is not updated and contains false information, it can be detrimental to finding that next great job. Otherwise, it can be a great way to contact your former colleagues as well as a way to obtain new leads.

Always Be Nice

Finally, even when you have started on that first job, whether it be a dream job or merely a stepping stone, make sure to be cordial and appropriate to your interviewees. I remember when I was interviewing, I met with a private practice attending who was touting the merits of his work to me. I subsequently found a job with a different practice. However, six months later, that same attending who interviewed me became an interviewee at my current practice. You never know what is going to happen!!!

Diversification of Skills

As a resident and fellow, try to do things in your field slightly out of your comfort zone. What do I mean by that? You never know what practices are going to want. Things change. Sometimes an imaging business may need a cardiothoracic radiologist but also require a radiologist that can also read mammograms. Other times, a practice may need an interventionist that feels comfortable with reading musculoskeletal MRI. To become the most competitive candidate in your class, you need to make sure that you feel comfortable in as many modalities as reasonable. Therefore, you should not just concentrate on your fellowship skills or areas of comfort, but also your weaker procedures/imaging areas.

As a fellow, it also becomes crucial to moonlight to maintain your skills in other general radiology areas, outside of fellowship. It can build your speed and accuracy. So, when you start your first job, you will be able to read studies at a reasonable pace. Moonlighting will allow you to have a higher likelihood of remaining at your first job after training!

Should Location Be The Sacrificial Lamb?

Sometimes the job market in some locations becomes so ultra-competitive that good jobs may not exist in your desired area. In that case, there are times when it makes sense to alter one’s expectations and apply to other locales outside of one’s original intentions. By switching locations, the applicant may significantly increase the job market choices that will allow her to practice her subspecialty or earn more income. However, an applicant should not take this decision lightly because personal or family issues sometimes can trump job selection. But, an applicant should consider all the alternatives before selecting a job.

Recommendations

As a radiology resident or fellow, obtaining a radiology job recommendation differs significantly from asking for one as a medical student. Instead of a formal letter, a radiology resident or fellow should let the attending know to expect a phone call from a radiologist at the practice where he had interviewed. Although informal, this practice gives more information to the radiology practice than a simple letter of recommendation. A radiologist can relay the real personality and information about a candidate on the phone more easily without legal repercussions. In this situation, no paper trail exists.

In the conversation, the caller may informally ask your supervising attending about your work ethic, whether you played well with your team, and more. Other times, a member of the practice may speak with a friend of theirs within your residency program to confirm that you would make a reasonable job candidate. Bottom line: it is good manners to let your attending and program know to expect a phone call!

Research/National Organizations

For those interested in academics, completing research projects can help to snag that first academic job. Although not as crucial for the private practitioner, it also can’t hurt to have completed research projects. As I’ve mentioned in a prior post on research, if practices have a choice between two equal candidates, they may sometimes choose the resident with more research experience. You never know…

Also, getting involved in national organizations, whether it be the ACR, RSNA, or AUR, can be a great way to learn about the politics of radiology as well to meet colleagues and practitioners. Residents should consider participation in these organizations.  It could be a stepping stone to find a great job or to become the next President!

Final Thoughts About The Job Market

If the job market is tight, all is not lost. Even in the most challenging markets, some practices will usually have a few jobs available. To increase your chances of getting one of these popular slots, you may need to work a bit more intelligently and focused so that you can become a desirable candidate. Networking, diversifying your skills, making sure to get great recommendations, finding the correct location, and participating in research and national organizations can help your cause. Ultimately, these practices will choose someone that fits the expected identity of an ideal candidate. If you follow these essentials, you have a much better chance that that person will be you. Good luck!!!

Posted on by

Buying vs Leasing A Car During Residency

leasing

Mass transportation is unavailable in all parts of the United States, unlike other countries, due to infrastructure issues and spread-out spaces. For this reason, many medical residents may consider buying or leasing a car during residency. It may not be such a simple question. Several times my residents have asked that I write a post on this subject matter. So, I will define what it means to lease a car and then explain how I would decide to buy versus lease a car with multiple thought experiments and comparisons.

What Is A Car Lease?

A car lease is a hybrid between buying and renting a car. It allows the lessor to spend a portion of the entire vehicle cost over a fixed period, usually with the option to buy the car at the end of the lease period at a depreciated amount. Monthly payments are typically less than a car purchase since it does not include the entire vehicle cost. The lease cost usually consists of the depreciating price of the car and monthly interest. The lease can contain additional fees in the monthly bill, including a charge for going over a fixed limit of miles and sometimes additional insurance costs not factored into a bought car.

The lessor will often put down a nominal fee at the beginning of the lease period. Bottom line- leasing a vehicle lets the lessee enjoy a more expensive car than they could typically afford with lower monthly payments. But the big question is- do they come at a significant cost?

Examples of Buying Vs. Leasing Cars

Whenever I make a financial decision, I like to take a mental picture of the different financial possibilities using thought experiments. Otherwise, it can be hard to understand the subtleties of the other arrangements. So, I am going to do just that with a typical car. I will assume the vehicle costs about 30000 dollars and that we will buy or lease the car over three years. Cars can be less costly if bought used, but for the point I am trying to make in this article, buying or leasing a new versus used car should not change the conclusions. In my first example, I will assume that we will hold the vehicle we purchased for over ten years and compare that to the costs of leasing for three years and buying out the lease after the three years are over. So, let’s do just that.

Scenario 1- Buying and Holding for 10 Years Vs. Leasing And Buying Out A Lease

Buying A Car

Let’s say the interest rates are 3% on the three-year loan for a new car and the lease. And, we will put down a nominal amount on the vehicle on both the car purchase and lease- say 2000 dollars on both. So, what are the monthly and total costs of buying a car over the entire period? To determine that, I will use one of my favorite financial programs in the world- a simple amortization calculator on the web from Bret Whissel called Amortization Calculator. So, the monthly payments on a bought car over three years after the nominal down payment is approximately 814 dollars for a total cost over the three-year loan of around 29313 dollars. The total cost of purchasing the vehicle will be 2000+29313 dollars or 31313 dollars.

Leasing A Car

How does this compare to the monthly payments on a three-year car lease? Let’s do the calculations. One of my favorite rules for determining the depreciation of a car that approximates reality is the rule of 10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1. For each year that you have owned the vehicle for up to 10 years, you can match the price of the car by taking the number of years that you have owned the vehicle, adding the numbers from highest to lowest for that period, and then dividing by the rule’s total (55). So, in this case, the amount of depreciation over three years would be 10+9+8/55 or 49%.

Alternatively, you can use a slightly more accurate calculator such as this one from Money-zine and develop a depreciation percentage of approximately 39%. For the sake of “accuracy,” we will use the more accurate calculator. The initial lump sum of 3-year monthly payments will be (0.39) (30000-2000) or 10920 without interest. Calculating interest at a 3% rate and using the amortization calculator, the monthly payments will be 317.57 dollars, and the total sum of payments over the three years will be 11433 dollars.

The Verdict

According to the calculations, the car’s residual value will now be 30000*(1-0.39) or 18300 dollars. Remember, the 2000 dollars you put down on the car does not contribute to the principal/cost basis of the vehicle. So, let’s finance the residual value payments over three years again at 3%. The monthly payments this second time around for buying the car out of the lease will be about 532 dollars, and the sum of the charges will be 19159 dollars. So, the total cost of the vehicle after leasing and then buying out the lease will be 2000+11433+19159 dollars for a total of 32592 dollars, not including additional leasing fees. The extra cost for leasing and buying out the car to get the lower payments vs. buying over three years is a mild difference of 32592-31313 or 1279 dollars total.

Scenario 2- Buying and Holding Vs. Continually Leasing for 10 Years

In the second example, I will compare leasing costs when you do not buy out the lease, continually leasing cars every three years over ten years, and compare that to buying and holding a car for ten years. So as in our first example, the initial cost of leasing the vehicle over three years will be 11433+2000 dollars. Let’s assume you will do that three and a third times over ten years. So, our total costs for leasing a car continually over the ten years would be 3.33*(11433+2000) or 44732 dollars.

For comparison, when we buy and hold a car for ten years, there will likely be increased repair costs for keeping a relatively older car. Let us then go ahead and add 500 dollars per year in repair costs after the initial three years of the loan for buying the vehicle. We will add that to the former loan price in the previous example or 31313+(7*500) or 34813 dollars. So, the additional cost for leasing a car continually over ten years compared to buying a car and holding for ten years would be 44732-34813 dollars or 9919 dollars, almost a third of the price of a car!!!

Scenario 3- Buying and Holding vs. Continually Leasing for 10 Years With Tax Deductions

In the third example, I will assume that the resident will moonlight and can deduct the car’s depreciated value from their total income annually at 25%. We will again compare the costs of releasing a vehicle every three years over ten years and compare that with buying and holding a car for ten years. Assuming you can deduct the depreciation from your salary, the new costs of leasing a vehicle would be [11433 (1-0.25) +2000]*3.33 or 35214 dollars over ten years. In this situation, the additional cost for continually leasing a car over ten years would be 35214- 34813 dollars or 401 dollars, which is more reasonable.

Scenario 4- Buying and Selling Over 10 Years vs. Continually Leasing Over 10 Years

In this example, I will compare what it would cost to buy and sell a new car every three years, assuming a 30000 dollar price tag for ten years without leasing vs. the cost of leasing cars over ten years. Most residents don’t like the hassle of constantly buying and selling cars, but it would be interesting to compare with leasing over the same time. So, let’s do the calculations.

Based on our initial scenario, buying the car every three years would cost 31313 dollars. So let’s assume we can sell the car every three years for 31313 dollars*(1-0.39) or the depreciated value of 19101 dollars. So, the cost over ten years would be 3.33*(31313-19100) for 40669 dollars. The additional cost for leasing cars over ten years vs. buying and selling cars over ten years would be 44732-40669 dollars or 4063 dollars, a moderate difference.

Scenario 5- Buying and Selling Over 10 Years vs. Continually Leasing Over 10 Years With Deductions

Finally, let’s compare the cost of leasing over ten years with the ability to deduct the depreciated lease value from your taxes compared to buying and selling cars every three years for ten years. The calculations were performed in several scenarios above, making these calculations easy. So, the total in this situation would be 35214 dollars for leasing and 40669 dollars for buying and selling over ten years. This scenario is one where it would be less costly to lease for a total savings of 40669-35214 dollars or 5455 dollars total.

What Can We Conclude Based on These Scenarios?

We have crunched all the numbers, and what can we conclude? The most stark difference under all these scenarios is between continually leasing a car for over ten years and buying and holding it for ten years. You would theoretically save 9919 dollars over ten years if you buy and own a vehicle, approximately 1/3 the car’s value. That’s a lot of money!!!

If you can deduct the car’s depreciated value from your income, then leasing a car every three years for ten years will be a slightly higher cost than holding on to a vehicle for ten years. If you like new cars, this proposition can make some sense.

Finally, the finances are almost always in favor of buying a car except for the one situation where you have to decide between leasing a car every three years for ten years and buying and selling a car every three years for ten years with the condition that you can deduct the depreciated lease value from your taxes because you are an independent practitioner/moonlighter/consultant. This situation would be highly unusual.

Final Thoughts

Always crunch the numbers based on your inputs (these may vary slightly from mine). But, for most residents, if you need a ride to work and must have a car- buy a car and avoid the lease. A lease will put you behind the eight ball over your initial working years, especially when getting rid of your student debt and beginning your savings/investments is crucial. On the other hand, if you can deduct the car’s depreciated value from other self-employment income, you can argue to lease instead of buy. And finally, if you are in the fortunate situation of being able to walk to work every day, perhaps you can do without a car altogether and save some money!!!

Posted on by

Radiology Residency And The SOAP Match

It’s the middle of March, and every 10 minutes, you are checking your email to see if you have matched in one of the most competitive specialties out there; maybe it was dermatology or radiation oncology. You can’t eat or drink. Your mouth is dry. Suddenly, you get the dreaded email- “You have not matched for the ‘blank’ specialty in the regular match.” All these years of work, and what do I have to show for it? A wave of depression sets in. You want to stick your head in the sand.

Unfortunately, every year this scenario plays out. Each year the dynamics of matching in competitive specialties becomes more challenging due to increasing numbers of medical schools/American MD graduates and stagnant American residency positions. (1) Not everyone gets their first choice of specialty during the standard NRMP initial match. Since this time of the year is about to arrive, I thought it was essential to give you some guidelines/tips on approaching the issue if you are one of these residents.

Wash That Fit of Depression Away

It is crucial to get into game mode. The SOAP process can be time-consuming and exhaustive from both an applicant’s and a program director’s perspective. But, to be a viable applicant, you need to move on. As an associate radiology residency director, one of my biggest turnoffs in the SOAP process is interviewing miserable residents that do not show a bit of enthusiasm for their new specialty choice. It is not the end of the world, and it is a sign of mental toughness and grit if you can adapt to the unique circumstances. Things don’t always go our way!!!

If you are in this situation, it is also important to remember that you are not alone. Numerous qualified medical students don’t match. Often the overall quality of the applicants is better than the initial match. So, don’t take this as a sign that you are going to make a horrible resident. It’s just not true.

Think About Your Options

Residency is a long, arduous process. So, this decision should be well thought out, and all applicants need to step back. Don’t rush into applying to a specialty if you are not convinced that you have an interest. If you are not sure, there are other options, such as applying for a transitional or prelim year and then reassessing the application during the year of residency. Only apply for the specialty of radiology if you are genuinely interested!

Most Applications In The SOAP Are From Different Specialties

We often get former applicants from matches of the most competitive specialties. Presently, these would be radiation oncology, dermatology, and some of the surgical subspecialties. For many years these specialties are entirely matched with no slack. So, your two choices are to reapply another year after completing a year of preliminary medicine or surgical internship. Or, you can change specialties entirely. You take a risk either way. If you reapply, you may not match the following year unless there is a significant change in your credentials. On the other hand, if you decide to match in the SOAP for another specialty such as radiology, you may be matching in an area that you may or may not genuinely interest you. You will need to make that hard choice in a very brief amount of time.

Significant self-reflection and analysis are critical at this juncture. Sometimes, the right choice is to apply to another specialty. I believe that medical schools underexpose students to many different subspecialties. Frequently, the best fit for a prospective resident is different from the specialty he/she initially applies. So, think about the possibility of applying to another specialty than you initially chose.

Don’t Fret About Application Items Not Geared To Radiology

Don’t worry if some of your recommendations, personal statements, and application are not entirely “radiology-centric.” The program directors usually understand the predicaments of the applying residents at this point. However, the applicant should develop reasons for his/her newfound interest in radiology during the interview since enthusiasm for the specialty is critical. Make sure you have a logical argument prepared for the phone or “in-person” interview for why you would be interested in radiology. It will go a long way toward securing a spot in a radiology program.

The Early Bird Gets The Worm

Joining the SOAP right away is probably one of the most critical factors in the residency SOAP match process. If you are not early in the draw, you are going to miss out on the spot. Make sure your application is submitted to your SOAP specialty of interest as early as possible. Often, we find out about outstanding candidates only out after the SOAP match ends. Don’t let that be you!!!

Try To Schedule Onsite Interviews If Possible

In the SOAP process, it is a significant advantage to match the face to the application. Although it is not always possible due to distance or other circumstances, if you are interested in a position and want to maximize your chances of acceptance during the SOAP process, an onsite interview shows your interest and ups your chances of obtaining a spot. (although not as critical in the times of Covid!) I always would rather deal with the known vs. the unknown entity. You get a better feel for the applicant, usually when he/she is sitting in front of you (or on Zoom!) rather than in a phone interview conversation. We have accepted applicants over the phone, but your chance of acceptance “in person” is higher. Try to get to the interview if possible physically.

Use Your Connections

Any connection to the SOAP match program of interest is of significant help. We value the known vs. the unknown quantity when we are looking at SOAP applicants. So, if you have any connection to the program of interest, it will give you a leg up in the process. It could be a resident you met at some point earlier in your medical school training, a former mentor, or a friend of a relative. It doesn’t matter. Any connection is often better than no relationship. Use it!!!!

This Too Shall Pass

The SOAP process is short-lived but very stressful for all parties. Applicants and programs that did not match the first try will often find a happy end to this story. Be enthusiastic, get past your depression, put time and effort into the SOAP process, and, often, the SOAP process will handsomely reward you. Don’t take it seriously, be depressed about not matching into your initial specialty, or take a lazy approach and you won’t. Good luck with the match!!!

(1) http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools/articles/2013/07/11/aspiring-med-students-face-growing-residency-competition

 

Posted on by — 9 Comments

How To Complete The ABR Alternate Pathway As A Foreign Physician

 

dear sir,
I have completed my radiology residency from India in 2015 and I wish to pursue radiology residency in usa.
I am unsure of how alternate pathway for radiology.ABR website says one must have a mix of radiology residency /fellowships/faculty post for four continuous years.If residency itself is for a duration of 5 years ,how would it be possible to have a combination of residency and fellowship for 4 years?
Is it possible to get 4 fellowships consecutively at the same institute?
kindly help me in this regard.

regards,
Fiona

Director1 response:
Radiology residency is for a total of 4 years in the United States. Prior to beginning a radiology residency, you need to have an additional year of clinical internship, usually medicine, surgery, or a transitional year (a year of multiple electives). The expectation from the ABR is that you will either repeat an entire 4 year radiology residency program at the same place (not the initial clinical year). The other possibility is that you have the experience to complete part of a radiology residency program and complete subsequent radiology related fellowships. So, you could theoretically have any combination or permutation of experiences, i.e. 2 residency years and 2 distinct fellowship years, 4 fellowship years, and so on/so forth. As you stated, all the years need to be performed at the same institution.

There are some large institutions that do have more than 4 different types of fellowships. But, if you did attend a United States residency program, more commonly, the foreign resident/fellow would complete a 2 or more year fellowship instead of a typical one year fellowship. (Nuclear medicine, neurointerventional, and neuroradiology fellowships can be 2 or more years) As long as you complete the prescribed 4 years in a radiology related area, you can satisfy the requirement.

Take a look at the following URL:

https://www.theabr.org/diagnostic-radiology/initial-certification/alternate-pathways/international-medical-graduates

 

Posted on by

The Chief Radiology Resident- An Insider’s Perspective

chief radiology resident

Every year around the dead of winter in our program, the program directors sit around a table and discuss who will be the next year’s chief radiology resident. For many of you, this process may seem like a mystery box. Why do we even have a chief resident anyway? What exactly does she do? And, how do we make this decision? These are some of the questions you may be asking.

To enlighten you on the world of the chief radiology resident, I will answer these questions. To do so, I will talk about all the nitty-gritty details such as the myriad roles of a chief resident, the perks and downsides of the job, why some years it can be easy or challenging to decide who should be the chief, and how many programs make a choice.

What is the Role of a Chief Radiology Resident?

Roles and responsibilities may vary slightly from program to program across the country. But the essence of a chief radiology resident usually remains the same. The chief resident is the liaison between the resident program and the program directors/attendings. Residents will bring issues that arise among their classes first to the chief resident and then to the program director or responsible attending. Likewise, faculty will bring problems that occur to the chief resident’s attention first, then disseminating the information to the residents.

The duties of a radiology resident include administrative scheduling of residents, scheduling noon conferences, scheduling board reviews, running review courses for medical students and junior residents, voting as a member of the educational committee, attending chief resident conferences such as the AUR meeting, scheduling guest lecturers, planning budgetary arrangements for the residency, interviewing medical students, and more. The responsibilities are significant, and the chief resident needs to command both the attendings’ and residents’ respect alike.

Downsides and Benefits

Like any role with essential responsibilities, there are significant ups and downs to being the chief resident. Let’s start with the downside. The chief resident is often held responsible for conflicts among the residents and between the attendings and residents. They are front and center in many of these issues. Usually, there are no perfect outcomes. Also, the role of the chief resident can be time-consuming and challenging. The scheduling of residents alone is often fraught with lots of emotion and charged conflicts. Each resident wants the best possible schedule for himself/herself, and many times not everybody can be accommodated. The chief resident may be held accountable.

However, there are some significant perks to the role. First and foremost, it can’t hurt to have the words “chief resident” on your resume when applying for fellowships and later attending radiology positions. Sometimes the chief may get to participate in free conferences or get an additional stipend at some programs. Other times, they benefit from getting inside information about the residency program’s inner workings before any other residents. Occasionally, it may help to get a position within the hospital or private practice where the residency is situated.

What Do We Look For In A Chief?

The first most critical feature of an excellent chief resident is to command respect among fellow residents and attendings. We do not want to pick a resident that shows up late, gets involved in numerous conflicts with other attendings or residents, or who is not a “team player.” Second, we look for a resident who has generally performed well academically and can handle the additional load of chief resident administrative responsibilities. And finally, we look for a chief resident who possesses a calm demeanor and is likable by all.

All these personality traits and features will allow the residency to continue to run smoothly and reduce the potential for significant conflict that can make the program director’s job even more difficult. Also, it gives the program directors an additional “ear to the ground” and an advisor that can be extremely useful to prevent miscommunication.

What Makes The Decision To Find A Chief Resident Easy or Difficult?

Assessing who is to become chief is not a decision that we take lightly. An earnest discussion ensues every year among those that make the final decision. Some residency years, one or two residents have been responsible for organizing the class, settling issues within the program, and are performing well academically. And, you may have several interested parties in performing the role and responsibilities of chief resident. When these stars align, the choice to make chief resident is straightforward.

Other years, you have many interclass conflicts, or there is no clear leader that makes decisions for the class. On occasion, we have a year with no one interested in performing the chief resident’s role, knowing there are additional responsibilities. These factors can make it very difficult to come up with a final choice.

How Do Programs Choose The Chief Radiology Resident?

Different programs have distinct policies regarding the installation of a new chief resident. In our radiology residency, the faculty and program directors choose the chief resident during the third year with attendings’ and residents’ input. The chief resident will typically begin his/her duties when the final year starts in July. Some years we have had both educational and administrative chief radiology residents, and other years we have had a single chief resident that takes care of both responsibilities. 

Other programs have a democratic policy, with the residents forming a voting body that may vote upon individual or multiple chief residents. The bottom line: there is no right or wrong way. But instead, the individual culture and traditions of the residency often determine how they choose the chief resident.

“To Be or Not To Be” A Chief Radiology Resident

The chief resident has a significant role in the smooth running of a residency program. The responsibilities can be overwhelming for some and can be an excellent leadership opportunity for others. If the program chooses you to be a chief resident, it is undoubtedly an honor. But, it also involves a lot of extra work and hard choices. Make sure you are up to the task!!!

 

 

Posted on by

How Far Should I Take That Procedure?

procedure

The Procedure Situation

Round 1

Your radiology attending tells you to interview a patient and then complete an ultrasound-guided breast biopsy, knowing that it was a large mass and a relatively simple case. You have done this procedure numerous times with this same faculty. So, you go ahead and do it again. No complications. No issues. After you complete the biopsy, you feel immense pride in your capabilities. You show the attending the pictures from the biopsy. The attending congratulates you on a job well done.

Round 2 later that same day…

A different radiology attending wants you to work up another patient and start the subsequent breast biopsy. So, you begin to interview the patient, set up the table and the sterile field, position the patient for the procedure, and place the ultrasound probe on the biopsy site. You begin to numb the overlying skin lidocaine and make a small incision for the biopsy gun. Since the attending still has not shown up, you decide to place the needle right near the lesion, hit the targeted breast nodule, and then subsequently collect multiple samples, placing each one into a little sterile cup on the side to send to pathology. You complete the rest of the procedure without complication. All seems to be well.

You clean up everything and let the patient know that everything went just fine. And, you tell her you are going to consult with the attending before you have her leave. So, you merrily step out of the room and walk down the hallway toward the radiologist’s office to let her know about the patient’s biopsy you completed. You enter the office and state, “I completed the biopsy successfully on patient “XYZ.” The attending stares at you with a stern, angry face and says, “How dare you complete the procedure without consulting with me!!!” You are the talk of the department for the next month!

How To Assess How Much You Can Do

Unfortunately, during radiology residency, you may encounter similar situations such as this one. Different attendings have entirely varying expectations for each radiology resident. Some may expect you to start and finish all procedures. Others may be less likely to allow the resident to have independence, even though he/she may be competent. So what to do? I will go through several guidelines in assessing whether you, as a radiology resident, should complete a given procedure on your own.

Are You Competent In The Procedure? 

Competency should be the first issue that you need to address as a radiology resident. Suppose you do not think you have done enough of a technique independently from start to finish. In that case, you certainly have no business doing any procedure or a portion of a procedure alone. The comfort level is also just as important. Even if you have the numbers of biopsies to back you up, if you do not feel comfortable with a procedure, you should also continue to make sure that you have your attending’s guidance at all times until you have that comfort level that you need.

Are We Doing the Procedure For The Right Reasons?

Before performing any procedure, you need to make sure that it has some clinical benefit. Nurses regularly come up to me and ask should we give intravenous contrast. The first thing I ask them is why are we doing the study/CT scan? It may not need contrast in the first place. Likewise, no matter how “minor” a procedure is, you always need to think about it if necessary first!!!

Level of Difficulty of Procedure/ Potential For Complications

Some procedures, such as an upper GI series, have a much lower complication rate than a complex liver embolization. So, it is essential to assess any given procedure’s difficulty and potential complications before deciding whether you should tackle it on your own. Most liver embolizations, stent placements, and angioplasties should probably be under the faculty’s direct supervision unless perhaps you are about to graduate from an IR fellowship in a few days. On the other hand, a paracentesis can undoubtedly be performed from start to finish by a resident.

Attending Expectations

Some attendings expect the resident to do almost everything and others feel the need to hold the resident’s hand at every step. Much of that decision may be related to the trust between the attending and resident. However, it is imperative to listen to the guidance of your attending before beginning or ending any procedure. Because you are not the physician who signs off on everything, you need to abide by the person’s rules in charge. Always make sure to get the OK from the supervising physician before performing any procedure!

Patient Expectations

Many patients expect an attending to complete a procedure. Always abide by the wishes of the patient. You never want to be caught in a situation where the patient does not want you to be performing a procedure, and you do so anyway. Not listening to the patient’s request is the realm of lawsuits and legal issues!!!

It’s All About Self-Awareness!

The difficulty of residency can be more about self-assessment/awareness and working with colleagues than about the actual day-to-day mechanics of performing cases. You, as a resident, need always to be aware of your strengths and weaknesses as well as your expectations. My advice: make sure to always know in advance that you are performing a procedure for the right reasons, have the abilities to conduct it, and your attending expects you to complete it. Only then should you consider performing a procedure independently!