Posted on

Inheriting Other Program’s Problems – The Lateral Residency Transfer

lateral residency transfer

Every once in a while, a program will lose a resident for various reasons. It could be to move closer to family, poor performance, or a gazillion other reasons. When this unfortunate event occurs, a program is stuck trying to fill a spot. And, you would think at first glance that it would be pretty straightforward. I mean, radiology is pretty competitive nowadays. Instead, only a fixed small number of residents can transfer from one PGY3, PGY4, or PGY5 spot to another. And, programs need to be very careful when they recruit these positions. A lateral residency transfer from another residency program can become more problematic than having one less resident in the program.

So, what are the issues that residency programs face when recruiting residents from other programs? And, what kind of transfers are programs looking for? Here are some of my thoughts on these situations.

Lateral Residency Transfer: A Minefield Of Problems

Professionalism Issues

Many applicants from other institutions leave because their former residency program does not want to renew their contracts. Out of those reasons, one of the most common is the professionalism violation. It could be any one of thousands of professionalism infractions, including ethical, moral, and legal issues. Moreover, programs suffer from a lack of information about the resident’s former residency. Frequently, the former site of the applicant doesn’t release “all the information.” So, poor professionalism behaviors can quickly arise again when the resident enters your program.

Academic Issues

In addition to the professionalism issue, many lateral transfer residents cannot academically make it through their current program. Perhaps, it is related to test-taking skills, dictations, or inability to make the findings. If you hire them without knowing the real issues, these same issues will eventually surface when they transfer to your program.

Medical/Mental Health Issues That Can Interfere With Training

We also have to worry about medical and mental health problems interfering with resident training. Notably, this information can be complicated to retrieve because it is a HIPAA violation for a program to give this information out to another freely. And although programs make every attempt to overcome these issues, it can lead to all sorts of problems for both the incoming resident and their colleagues who need to cover them.

The Fickle Resident

Finally, some residents leave because they spontaneously want to abandon their former program for various unstable reasons. These include dating scenes, being in a warmer climate, or myriad other miscellaneous reasons. This sort of resident can decide to do the same when entering your program. Not a great situation!

What Programs Want From A Lateral Residency Transfer

Residents That Need To Leave To Be Closer To Family

Sometimes residents will have a sick relative, and they need to care for them. Or, they have a wife and children who live in a different country than their current residency program. These reasons are legitimate. And, they make for a happier resident that will be more likely to complete the radiology residency.

Particular Interests That The Former Residency Cannot Satisfy

Other times residents discover they have different interests that one residency cannot meet. Perhaps, they are interested in participating in bench research not available to them at their current site. Or, maybe the new site has a PET-MRI, which is the resident’s area of interest. Regardless, these reasons can be valid as to why the resident may want to come to your program.

Legitimate Medical Issues That Will Not Interfere With Training

Some residents need to be closer to certain cities/hospitals to get their treatment. And, perhaps, it is not available at the current institution/town. Or they need the care of family members to help them with health issues. These residents can potentially become a great asset to a new program if they meet its demands.

A Real Change Of Heart For The Lateral Residency Transfer

In medicine, it is effortless to make a mistake. We don’t necessarily know what we want to do when we get out of medical school. Medical schools do not give the best sampling of what life is like post-medical school in all specialties. And, many residents realize they made a mistake early on. Sometimes nuclear medicine residents or emergency medicine residents who have completed imaging rotations can qualify for these more advanced positions. Well, these sorts of residents can become the best trainees because of their dedication to doing something they want to do instead.

The Lateral Residency Transfer Can Be A Tough Situation!

Due to all the pitfalls and possibilities that a lateral transfer can offer, it can be challenging to cull residents that will fit the new program’s culture and meet the demands and rigorous tests of residency. Selecting residents with professional/academic violations, medical issues, or the fickle resident can throw a wrench in the new residency program when similar problems arise in the new program. And this situation can be worse than not recruiting any radiology resident. But, many residents have valid reasons for changing programs as well. So, residency programs, just like the residents, need to do their due diligence. The consequences of picking the wrong resident can be dire!

Posted on

Why Residents Should Start Returning To On Site Lectures!

on site lectures

Since Covid-19 began, most radiology residencies throughout the country have moved to a model of all remote lectures. At first, it was a knee-jerk reaction, which was entirely logical at the time. Now that we have a better idea of the disease and how it spreads, programs can return to a system with some live lectures. Programs can safely organize conferences with smaller groups in larger spaces to reduce transmission chances. Like public schools, many radiology residencies are returning to some form of a hybrid system with remote and on site lectures.

However, not all programs are going in that direction. So, what have residents lost over the past half-year by having remote lectures only? And, do they stand to gain anything by returning to some form of in-house live classes? Let’s go through why most programs should, in-part, try to get back to some on site lectures.

Keep Residents Awake And Focused

I’ve been in this situation many times. Zoom starts up, and instead of having the camera focused on your face, you decide to put a picture up with a likeness of you and start completing other work. Or, you tend to another conversation at the same time. The bottom line is that it is much easier to lose focus when you are in a remote environment because there is less buy-in. Many other options are available to capture your attention than the lecture itself.

More Invested In Studying For The On Site Lectures

If you know that you will attend a lecture in person, you are much more likely to read up on a topic. Why? Because you don’t want to look like a total dullard. That motivation is vital for some residents to stay on top of their reading. Going remote without that feeling of obligation decreases the resident’s responsibility to learn some of that material beforehand. Anonymity breeds less involvement in the subject matter.

The Personal Touch

Once you go online to listen to your conferences, you lose some of the nuances of the conversation. The lecturer may not see those beads of sweat welling onto your forehead when you are unsure of an answer. Likewise, the listener may lose the tone of the lecturer, perhaps frustration or satisfaction. By missing these cues, you also lose the opportunity to figure out what you might be missing in the conversation and help that student or redirect the speaker.

Training on Software

I don’t know about your program. We have lots of different programs in our nuclear medicine department to help us interpret images. We have one system for DATscan quantification, another method for Neuroquant, a general PACS, GE software for processing cardiac studies, TeraRecon for looking at PET-CT scans, and Intellispace for remote nuclear medicine access. I’m probably even missing a few more. However, my point is that it is challenging to train residents on software without that hands-on touch in person. In my experience, Zoom like encounters for this sort of training does not do the trick. It can be harder to point out how to use different kinds of programs and software.

Esprit-De-Corps

Finally, joint meetings lead to shared experiences both from students/residents and lecturers as well. When you are all in the same environment, you build trust, social interactions, and the feeling of a team environment. It’s just not the same taking your conferences online where you can’t discuss issues after the lecture or crack a few jokes together. It tends to be all business, not the sort of environment that helps to form bonds.

Returning To On Site Lectures Once Again!

As much as it may be more convenient to give and receive lectures by Zoom, there is a role for returning to some form of on-site classes. Of course, remaining healthy is a top priority in almost any residency program. But, it is possible to keep your lecturers and residents at reasonably low risk if you take the proper precautions. So, based on the net positives of keeping residents focused, improving resident studying, personalizing the learning experiences, better technical training, and maintaining a team environment, hopefully, your program is considering on site training in some form once again. It’s not just for show. These are tangible benefits to the on site experience!

Posted on

Final Results From The Radiology Call Pain Points Poll!

pain points

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Radiology Pain Points Survey Results

The results of the radiology pain points survey are finally in. And, I bet that many of you would like to know if your colleagues have the same feelings of dread about overnights as you do. So, let’s get right down to the nitty-gritty.

Of all the most dreaded parts of the overnight call, a majority of the respondents stated that they dreaded missing findings the most (51%). And, that makes sense given that everyone has the potential to miss something critical in the wee hours. In second place (30%), you guys selected lack of sleep. Again, not surprising because most of us hate the feeling of nausea and dizziness that sets in at 4 AM. Our bodies and mind abhor lack of sleep! In a distant third (8%), you had selected the fear of injuring patients as the most dreaded aspect of overnights. I had expected this fear to be a little bit higher. But, missing findings often lead to patient injury. So, perhaps this is the proximate cause for this response. And, therefore, you picked this response less frequently.

And finally, there was a smattering of other responses, including a confrontation with colleagues, and some great comments like -dealing with phone calls, contrast reactions, and the isolation of overnights.

Take-Home Message

So, what is the final take-home message from this poll? Well, for one, we need to come up with better ways for you to deal with some of the most significant issues that you will face on overnight call. I don’t believe many residencies have addressed these issues well. For example, we talk about sleep deprivation, and most residencies give you some lectures at the beginning of the academic year. But, what are some real-world radiology specific techniques that we can utilize to mitigate its effects? And, how can we ensure that you have the tools to make the necessary findings at nighttime? Are a precall quiz and a first-year introducti0n to call enough? Perhaps, residencies and the regulating bodies need to do more. Just some food for thought!

 

Posted on

Can You Pass The 2018 Saint Barnabas Precall Quiz?

Due to the popularity of last year’s precall quiz post, I am back at it again. Today, I am posting 10 cases from the real 2018 quiz that we used to ensure our residents are ready prior to beginning call. Of course, we used our PACS system to see if they could not only understand the disease entities but also make the findings as well. Unfortunately, you will not have the same option. However, these cases will help to benchmark where you may stand.

When you go through the test, come up with the findings, diagnosis, and if asked/relevant, management. In order to see how you did, answers are at the bottom of this page. (Don’t peek until you are finished!) One more thing… in order to pass the test without conditioning, you need to get at least 70 percent right. Enjoy!

Precall Quiz

Case 1

 

Case 2

 

 

Case 3

 

 

How would you manage this case?

Case 4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 5

 

What questions do you need to ask?

How do you manage this case?

 

Case 6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 7

part A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1st film- 2 years ago

2nd film- today

What is the differential diagnosis?

What do you want to do next?

 

part B

 

 

 

Case 8

 

 

 

 

Case 9

 

 

 

Case 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answers:

Case 1:

Right thalamic/basal ganglia intraparenchymal bleed with intraventricular extension.

Accompanying early transtentorial herniation. (needs to be mentioned for full credit!)

Case 2:

Right-sided pyelonephritis/early abscess formation. Renal mass/neoplasm can be within differential diagnosis.

Case 3:

Aortic dissection extending from the inferior thoracic cavity to iliac arteries.

Accompanying perivascular fluid and effusion- possibly blood products, consider ruptured dissection

For full credit-need to mention that you would call the vascular surgeons

Case 4:

Ultrasound appendicitis with appendicoliths

Case 5:

You need to ask history. (?B-HCG positive)

Ruptured ectopic pregnancy.

Case 6:

Homolateral Lisfranc fracture dislocation

Case 7:

Part A

New prominent bilateral hila- Interval development of adenopathy or pulmonary arterial hypertension

CT of the chest recommended for further characterization.

Part B

Bilateral chronic pulmonary emboli with pulmonary hypertension

Case 8:

Acute biliary leak with extraluminal radiopharmaceutical.

Focus within the hepatic hila- most likely biloma/origin of the biliary leak

Case 9:

Distal left ureteral stone with left renal hydronephrosis and hydroureter. Accompanying inflammatory change at the left kidney and ureter.

Case 10:

No acute disease. Possible recently ruptured left ovarian cyst.

 

 

Posted on

Is Four Years The Right Duration For A Radiology Residency?

years

Since the creation of radiology as a specialty, the duration of radiology residency has slowly increased. When the first “radiologists” began training, a radiology apprenticeship/residency took as little as one year. After the American Board of Radiology (ABR) was formally created, the board decided to increase the number of years in residency to three years in 1940. (1) Finally, in 1982, the ABR set the required years for board certification to 4. (2)

So, what is magical about the “most recent” decision in 1982 to set residency as a 4-year process? And would it make sense to create a different length of time for completion of radiology residency? Using a thought experiment, we will imagine what would happen if the ABR suddenly changed the radiology residency from four years to three or five years. More specifically, we will address the essential benefits and disadvantages of changing the time spent in radiology training if the ABR changes the requirements for a three or five-year residency.

What Would Happen If Radiology Residency Was Three Years?

Biggest Problems

Based on my own experiences, a resident must meet a certain threshold of reads and procedures to establish competency in a given area. In the setting of a three-year residency, I believe that not all the residents will achieve this number in all subjects. Could the job market withstand new trainees with experience? Possibly, if we no longer created general radiologists and only wanted to make subspecialist radiologists. However, the current demand for radiologists seems to be for subspecialists who can practice general radiology. So, the new output of radiologists would theoretically not meet the workforce’s needs.

Furthermore, programs would need to cancel training that we all know as part of radiology residency today. For instance, would residents have the time to structure a one-month rotation at the AIRP if the residency length is only three years? (I found it to be a valuable experience!) Or, how can you substantiate the need for mini-fellowships when you have significantly less time for training? The ABR and residencies would have many of these issues to work out.

And finally, you would create one year when you would have double the number of radiology trainees entering the workforce. You may think that is not a big deal. However, due to the laws of supply and demand, those radiologists that graduated in that year of change would likely have significantly more problems obtaining a job!

Biggest Advantages

With the significant rise in student debt, eliminating a year of residency would considerably impact the lives of new residents. Imagine being able to pay your debts off a year sooner. Furthermore, trainees have already delayed gratification for so many years. Wouldn’t it be nice to start your actual career a year earlier?

From a program director’s perspective, one less year of residency would reduce some bureaucratic burdens upon the residency programs. Naturally, you would need one less year of paperwork to be processed. So, that would reduce some costs on the individual programs. But, this is more of an indirect benefit to residency programs.

 

What Would Happen If Radiology Residency Was Five Years?

Biggest Problems

If we started with five-year residency programs, I think we would first notice increased radiology resident fatigue and burnout. More specifically, this would primarily affect the first class of “outgoing” seniors since they would need to alter their expectations radically. Believe me. An extra year of residency is no minor issue!

On the financial side, residents would increase their debt burdens by an extra year of relatively lower pay. For those without debt, this probably would not impact you as much. But for most residents, an additional year can add to a significantly increased financial burden.

Less specific to individual residents, the extra year would cause a one-year absence of outgoing trained residents into the workforce. Understaffed private practices would become more severely burdened because many imaging businesses would have to freeze hiring for one year until the typical graduating schedule returned to normal. This is no small matter.

Biggest Advantages

Firstly, radiology residents would have increased experience when entering the workforce after a five-year residency. An extra year means significantly more mammograms, CT scans, MRIs, and procedures before beginning a career pathway. Moreover, the fifth-year seniors would easily be able to run academic radiology departments throughout the country. The prominent academic centers would love this. More “free” labor with more academic time for faculty members!

In that same vein, you would also satisfy the current practice’s needs by hiring subspecialists that can also practice general radiology, the most significant current demand in the private practice workforce. And similarly, you would also be creating fewer super subspecialized radiologists that could only read their subspecialties.

Additionally, you could make an argument to return the board exam to the last year of year residency before graduation. For the individual resident, this would mean more time to study during residency instead of preparing for the certification examination after entering the workforce.

 

My Take

Change is never easy. But, change that can lead to significant improvements for the current residents and workforce makes a lot of sense. In this case, I do not see that the advantages outweigh the problems of changing the number of years of radiology residency. Perhaps, later on, the balance may be altered. But, based on current practices, changes in duration would present undue burdens upon residents, faculty, and private practices without enough rewards to make the change worthwhile. Let’s continue monitoring the situation but keep things the way they are for now!

 

 

 

 

 

(1) https://www.theabr.org/about/our-history

(2) http://radiology.yale.edu/about/history/

(3) https://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=ser&sub=def&pag=dis&ItemID=110650

 

 

Posted on

The Isolated Specialist

isolated

No, this is not another article about physician burnout. Instead, today we will talk about why isolated specialists can lead to poor patient outcomes. So, why do I find this interesting? In my own experience, I have encountered multiple instances when I see isolated specialists as the cause of deficient patient care. Let me give you an example.

A radiologist will encounter a non-radiologist physician demanding that his patient receive unwarranted intravenous contrast for his CT scans every once in a while. What is the big deal about administering unwarranted intravenous contrast on CT scans? Well, say you perform a contrast-enhanced CT scan for a pulmonary nodule. Or perhaps, you decide to approve a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen to check for a retroperitoneal bleed with contrast while on Coumadin. The patient risks returning home with a “present”- acute renal failure in both situations.

Meanwhile, both CT scans would give you the same result regardless of whether we administer intravenous contrast. And both of these cases of acute renal failure are entirely preventable. If you perform the study as directed by the physician, you have complied with the order as the radiologist. Unfortunately, these cases can lead to a lawsuit that you have no hope of winning.

Poor Communication And The Isolated Specialist

So, what does this all have to do with the isolated specialist? The ordering physicians decided to order CT scans on their patients without consulting with the radiologist in both cases. Sometimes these orders can go through the system without the OK of the radiologist. And in both situations, communication with the radiologist could have prevented unnecessary contrast administration. Or in other words, lack of communication/isolation between the ordering specialist and the radiologist was the proximate cause of a bad patient outcome.

All this brings me to discuss the topic of today- the isolated specialist. I will divide it into two different sections: What are the effects of operating “in a bubble” isolated from our colleagues? And how can we prevent physicians from working in isolation from one another?

Effects Of Operating “In A Bubble”

Untoward Side Effects

Witnessed in the examples above, two patients that should have had a non-contrast scan instead had their scan “upgraded” to an intravenous contrast-enhanced CT scan. Instead, a simple phone call from the physician could have prevented the possibility of a bad outcome. And these examples are just the tip of the iceberg. Many other cases exist where the clinician could have communicated with the physician and prevented a bad outcome.

Increased Expense

Imagine how much expense inappropriate imaging costs both the insurance company and the out-of-pocket expenses to the patient. It’s not just the additional unnecessary contrast. Instead, it is the additional weeks spent in the hospital, blood draws, nurses, physicians, and on and on. The physician could have avoided all of that with a simple discussion with the radiologist.

Prolonging Workups And Hospital Stays

In our example above, it is not just the untoward patient side effects and unmanageable expenses incurred. Instead, it is also the increased time the patient may need to stay in the hospital to figure out the patient’s disease entity. Very few patients say, “I have renal failure.” Patients may experience fatigue and other nonspecific symptoms. And a physician has to work up the clinical situation. Imagine the loss of time from work or other productive activities incurred by the patient and doctor.

Also, this is just one example. Lack of communication between radiologists and specialist cause all sorts of problems. Ridiculous unnecessary workups often ensue, wasting everyone’s time.

Radiologist Lawsuits

Don’t forget about the potential for lawsuits. All the factors from the above situation meet the criteria to allow a legitimate case. These would be breach, causation, and damages:

  1. The radiologist administered intravenous contrast inappropriately, breaching the standard of care.
  2. Contrast administration is the proximate cause of the patient’s renal failure.
  3. The patient suffered damages, including renal injury and a hospital stay.

A simple discussion between the physicians could have prevented a lawsuit.

Remaining Ignorant About Alternative Diagnoses and Treatments

Frequently, I learn about many of the most up-to-date patient diagnostic tests and treatments when I pick up the phone and discuss a case with a clinical colleague. In the situation above, a simple question about contrast could have avoided causing harm to a patient. This example is one where the ordering doctor remained ignorant about alternative methods of diagnosis (a non-contrast CT scan) when no communication ensued. Isolating oneself from phone calls with the specialist often prevents the best possible patient outcomes.

How Do We Prevent The Specialist Isolation?

Make It Easier To Contact Physicians

I think we have to blame both the ordering physician and the radiologist in these situations. Many physicians make it next to impossible to contact them by phone. Likewise, I know many radiologists who shun the phone under all circumstances. We have to make a conscious effort to make ourselves more available. Perhaps, it is a simple answering service that can solve the problem. Or, a radiology assistant may do the trick to improve communication.

Remember We Don’t Know Everything

Sometimes, we need to remind ourselves that each of our own experiences by ourselves is extremely limited. Only our interaction with others can allow us to understand patient issues best and give our patients the best care possible. We need to remain humble and ask for help from the radiologist and the ordering physician.

Computer Guidance

I hate to say it. But, clinical decision support systems have the potential to increase communications between clinicians and radiologists. When the computer detects the potential for a wrong imaging study order, it will force the clinician to interact with the radiologist. Potentially, this can relieve some of the issues of specialist isolation.

Attend Physician Friendly Events (Staff Meetings, Golf Outings)

Finally, many say that interdepartmental physician functions are unnecessary. But, I cannot disagree more. Making ourselves feel more comfortable with our colleagues allows physicians to be more likely to pick up the phone with a colleague who can become a friend. What better way to decrease isolation than sharing fun events with our colleagues?

Final Thoughts About The Isolated Specialist

Radiologists and specialists need to treat specialist isolation as a severe barrier to good patient care. And unfortunately, isolation is all too common. So, we need to make inroads to break down these barriers. Reducing specialist isolation will prevent patient side effects, reduce hospital stays, lessen patient expenses, decrease lawsuits, and increase diagnostic and treatment options. As specialist physicians, let’s all make a concerted effort to solve this critical problem together.

 

Posted on 1 Comment

Ten Things Radiologists Cannot Tell The Ordering Clinician (We Wish We Could!)

ordering clinician

As residents and radiologists, we have all experienced frustrations that we cannot verbalize to an ordering clinician for fear of retribution. Perhaps, the ordering clinician may stop referring patients to us. Or, just maybe we will get written up in the middle of the night for performing unprofessionally. That would end badly! Regardless, I have created a list of ten things that all radiologists and radiology residents wish we could tell you, the ordering clinician, but cannot quite get up the nerve to do so. So, here we go.

Examine The Patient First

How frustrating is it that patients get a hepatobiliary scan to rule out cholecystitis, only for us to discover afterward that the patient had a cholecystectomy? Or, we receive a CT scan to rule out appendicitis, only to find out there is no appendix! Come on, guys, do your due diligence, PLEASE!!!

Throw Me A Bone- Give Me Some More History

You ever heard that saying called GIGO- garbage in, garbage out? Well, that certainly applies to us! Please, no more clinical histories with abnormal clinical findings or rule out? What does that exactly mean? If you want your reports to be somewhat valuable, throw us a bone!!!

I Cannot Read Your Handwriting- Write Something Legible Next Time.

Ever consider the amount of time we waste trying to mull over what you wrote on the prescription? Precious time that we could have used to get home earlier lost! Did you write CT w/ for contrast, or does CT w/o mean without contrast? This stuff matters!!!

Get An Answering Service, Bub!

Yes, there are times that we need to contact you. One of the most frustrating things in the world is to make that phone call that your patient has a pneumothorax only to find you, the ordering clinician, are out to lunch without anyone to contact. Please, please, please. If you are not around, find us someone who is covering!!!

Don’t Kill The Messenger

Hey, guys… We are only trying. Don’t get angry with us when we are doing you a service by letting you know that patient has an unforeseen pulmonary mass. Or, maybe we want to tell you that your patient has acute appendicitis. I don’t care if you are on vacation when we get you on the phone. Please show us a little bit of respect!

Just Provide The Relevant Facts, Man, We Don’t Have All Day!!!

We, too, have studies to read and patients to see. Could you not keep us on the phone? We have to hear about all the patient’s irrelevant labs, history, and physical examination. Keep it short and sweet, folks. We have lives that we would like to lead!

Don’t Send Us Your Patients At 4:55 PM!

Why do you like to send us your patients right before we are about to leave? Well, maybe, that patient with a GI bleed that you don’t want to work up because you want to go for the day. So, you send that patient for a GI bleeding scan instead of an endoscopy that you would typically do. The patient gets extra radiation, and then you delay the final diagnosis. Is that good patient care? NO!!!

We Are Not The Hospital Dumping Ground- Take Care Of Your Patients

So, your patient is giving you anxiety because he is combative on the floor. Therefore, you send the patient out to get a test so you can get a breather. Well, if you can’t handle your patients, we certainly can’t control your patient when they need to stay still. We are not the hospital dumping ground. At the very least, give your patient a valium if you send them down to our department!

If You See Us Dictating- Don’t Interrupt Us Until We Are Done!

You wouldn’t stop a surgeon in the middle of surgery. So why the heck would you want to interrupt us in the middle of our dictation? We provide essential information to our clinicians, and studies (1) show that interruption prevents radiologists from making all of the findings. Please… Appreciate what we do!

Give Us A Chance To Look At The Films Before Coming Up With A Final Opinion

So, you came down to our department to talk to us about the study you just ordered. Maybe, it is a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis. Or perhaps, an MRI of the knee. If you know the nuances of reading these studies and you are telling us all the findings, then why did you come down in the first place? Did you do a 4-year radiology residency already? I think not. Give us a chance to make the correct diagnosis, not the one you want to tell us!

Final Words To The Ordering Clinician

We are clinicians, too, so we appreciate some professional courtesy. Do onto others as they would do to you!

 

  1. http://www.academicradiology.org/article/S1076-6332(14)00307-9/fulltext?cc=y=
Posted on

Patient 0- A Mystery Wrapped In An Engima

Today I am going to try something completely new- a case study as a blog. Typically, I have not attempted to make the focus of this blog individual case studies. But, this case touched upon so many interesting medical, ethical, political, and professional issues that I felt that it was worthy of its own post. So, let me give you some background on patient 0 and allow me to explain.

The Background On Patient 0

A fairly young patient arrives at our emergency department after entering the country by plane, 3 days prior to admission. She claims to have worsening right upper quadrant pain exacerbated by eating. In addition, she states that she never had any imaging studies either here in this country or from her home country. After “examining” patient 0, the emergency physician decides to order a hepatobiliary scan to exclude cholecystitis. So, the patient comes to our nuclear medicine department for the study. Initially, we take a prelim scout image prior to injecting the radiopharmaceutical and this is what we see:

 

A technologist looks at the study and determines that maybe there was some contamination and repeats the image again after cleaning the table. Here is the image again!!!

 

Panic!!!

No change… Uh oh, where is this activity coming from? She just flew in from a foreign country and claims to have had no tests after entering the United States. The physicist is subsequently called down to interview the patient. Here are some of the questions and answers:

Physicist: “Are you sure you did not receive any medical tests since arriving in the United States?”

Patient: “No…”

Physicist: “Did you receive any medical tests when you were in your home country?”

Patient: “Yes, I got an injection of something in my arm to relieve my pain.”

Physicist: “What was that injection?”

Patient: “I don’t know. Pain medication?”

Physicist: “Did you eat anything unusual?”

Patient: “I ate a regular light breakfast and lunch.”

So, the physicist calls over the radiology manager of the department and myself, the nuclear medicine physician of the day. Given the absence of a clear history of radiopharmaceutical administration, he becomes concerned that either patient may have ingested radioactivity from a contaminated source or the patient may have had an exposure something that is highly radioactive. Exposure to a dirty bomb??? We all begin to sweat profusely.

What would you do next?

Calmer Heads Prevail

So, the physicist takes at the Geiger counter and notes that the radioactivity coming from the patient is less than 0.1 mR/hr at 1 meter. Whew, at least we know that the patient is not a danger to the personnel in our department.

Now, how would you deal with this situation???

Well, we decided to change the primary photopeaks of the camera to determine the most likely Kev of the gamma rays emanating from the patient. Theoretically, if the radioactivity was from a nuclear plant or other unusual sources, the patient would not have a photopeak coming from the typical photopeaks for medical imaging. So, we tried imaging with photopeaks at I-131 and thallium. Neither of these photopeaks matched the images coming from the camera. (counts were lower and images were blurred) The best photopeak with the most resolution and counts was from the Tc-99m photopeak, shown in the images above. At least, we were now fairly sure that the radioactivity was from a medical source.

What Next?

Given a large amount of uptake in the belly and the discovery that patient 0 was not a medical hazard to staff and patients, we decided to send the patient back to the emergency department. Since there was too much uptake in the abdomen, we could not run a hepatobiliary scan and recommended the patient receive a different test. (Patient ended up getting an MRCP showing numerous stones in  a dilated CBD and had an ERCP to remove the stones).

Implications, Politics, And Ethics

Let’s go back a bit. I stated before that patient 0 reported to have recently traveled from a foreign country. How would it have been possible for patient 0 to get to this country with this amount of gamma rays coming from her abdomen? If the patient truly traveled from her home country several days ago, wouldn’t the radiation have been detected at the airport? Would she really be in this country at this point? Probably not.

But, no detectors are foolproof. Sometimes, a detector could not be functioning properly or can malfunction. But, does that still likely explain the patient’s radioactivity? Unlikely. Why? Since technetium 99m half life is 6 hours, and the patient states she traveled to this country 3 days ago, would she really have this amount radiotracer left in the large bowel? No.

So then, what is really is going on here? Personally, I think that she received a medical dosage of a radiopharmaceutical, possibly for a hepatobiliary scan, after arriving in the United States. And then, she likely left the other facility to come to our hospital, maybe against medical advice. That begs the question. Why?

Immigration Policy Issues

My first thoughts: Could she be here at our hospital because she feared deportation back to her home country? Was she a medical tourist who was hoping to get better treatment in our country? I’m not sure of the real answer to why she was here.

But, the real question in my mind. Are we going to see more of this type of situation in the future? With new and stricter immigration policies, more patients may decide that they cannot tell the truth about their prior imaging because of the real or imagined fears of deportation. I think this has the potential to be the proverbial “tip of the iceberg”. We may see more cases like this in the future.

Our Ethical Obligations

First and foremost, as physicians, we are obliged to serve our medical duty to the public and ensure that we do no harm to others. In this case, we accomplished that once we figured out that the radiation dose and exposures were not harmful to other people.  However, in my mind, many questions still remain about this case, especially what are our ethical obligations if she was exposed to a non-medical radioactive source. How would we have handled that situation? Who would we have notified next? Do we follow the regular channels of just contacting the Radiation Safety Officer. Or do we also get in touch with the patient’s relatives, the police, the nuclear regulatory commission, or the FBI…

Bottom Line

Fortunately for us, we averted a potentially scary situation. But, it really makes you think about all the potential outcomes of a radioactive patient 0 scenario. What about next time?

Comments From You

I would love to hear what you, the reader, think about this case since it makes for a great discussion. Would you have done anything differently? What are your thoughts about a patient such as this that could potentially arrive at your institution?

 

 

 

 

Posted on

The 2017 Annual AUR Meeting- A Radiology Residency Status Report

Each year in the heart of spring in the United States, academic/teaching radiologists get together at a different part of the country to discuss the newest teaching methods, radiology residency issues, and hot academic topics at a meeting called the annual Association of University Radiologists (AUR) meeting. For new applicants and radiology residents, this meeting is extremely important as it outlines significant changes to the training of radiologists throughout the country. This year is the first annual update from Hollywood, Florida. I am going to go over what I think are the most relevant and important topics at this conference for radiology trainees.

Increasing Competitiveness of Radiology Residency

Traditionally, it is somewhat difficult to measure competitiveness of radiology residency compared to other specialties. One of the more accurate methods is the United States senior U.S. fill rate. Since 2014, there has been a gradual uptick in the senior U.S. fill rate to 72% (last year 68%). In addition, the applicant pool is up 31 percent over the past 4 years. So, it appears that all this talk about artificial intelligence has not yet dampened the enthusiasm of radiology candidates!

There are always two sides to every story, however. Since U.S applicants usually get first priority, it is a bit more difficult for international medical graduates (IMGs) to get radiology residency slots. In fact, on a survey at the AUR meeting, it stated that only 64 percent of programs are willing to take international medical graduates. That number tends to go down as radiology becomes more competitive. Furthermore, programs are no longer able to accept foreign non-ACGME accredited preliminary year internships to satisfy the requirements of the clinical year.

Improving Radiology Job Market

According to the recent AUR survey, practices are increasing both new and current radiology job hires. In fact, projections show an increasing number of available jobs numbering about 2000 today (vs. 1300-1500 jobs a few years ago). The most popular specialties are body imaging, interventional radiology, and neuroradiology.  However, practices need breast imagers, interventional radiologists, and neuroradiologists the most. And, the majority of jobs are in private practice. That being said, large corporate practices do continue to increase hiring radiologists the most.

IR/DR and ESIR

Now that IR/DR is its own distinct specialty, it commanded a fairly competitive match this year. For this subspecialty, the fill rate with U.S. seniors was 85% versus 72% for diagnostic radiology. So by all accounts, the match was fairly successful. In addition, many new residency programs are applying to start up both IR/DR and ESIR programs. Both of these programs allow a resident to complete his/her entire training in 6 years. Unlike radiology residencies willing to add on these programs, residencies that do not start up IR/DR and ESIR programs will force their residents to have to complete a total of 7 years of residency/fellowship for interventional radiology trained subspecialists. Accordingly, those residencies not willing to add either ESIR or IR/DR programs are likely going to have difficulty recruiting new residents.

Rad Exam

The current in-service examinations do not correlate well with resident performance. In fact, many residencies (including my own) cannot utilize the test as a determiner of residency performance given the wide variability. In addition, there is no distinction in the testing questions between different residency levels. To remedy this issue, a new crowd sourced examination call Rad Exam is being created with institutional benchmarks and a large database. Time will tell if it becomes a useful examination to replace our current in-service examination, but it sounds very promising!

Simulation

Although not a discussed in conference at the AUR meeting, a vendor called Simulation was present and had an interesting solution for programs that want a structured precall examination. This company created an excellent standardized test that assesses finding and interpretive skills using a simulated PACS system to help define if a resident is ready to partake in independent call. Additionally, the test is benchmarked to other programs. It seems like it may be significant improvement over the current precall testing options.

ABR Core Examination Frustrations

Interestingly, according to faculty surveys, most faculty members reflect fondly upon the old oral board examination and give low marks to the new core examination as a means of  testing residents to meet basic radiology requirements at the end of their 3rd year. However, even more disappointing to me, the American Board of Radiology (ABR) now takes a new formalized position that they have no role in testing communication skills. In fact, they explicitly stated that their only role is the testing of medical knowledge. According to them, communication skills should be taught at the local residency level.

Call me crazy, but radiology is a specialty of communication, both written and oral, and not just a specialty of medical knowledge. If that is the case, does it make sense that the ABR as an accrediting body is not willing to standardize testing for communication skills as well as medical knowledge to establish a baseline level of competency? I think not. Academic radiologists need to push the board to change their stance regarding communication competency standardization with oral/written board testing!!!

Increasing Required Administration Time For Program Directors

And finally, on July 1, 2018, the ACGME will likely approve an increase in the minimum administration time requirements for program and associate program directors. Presently, program directors at small programs in the United States can have a few as 0.2 FTE time dedicated to radiology residency administration. That number is ridiculously small compared to other medical subspecialties. Now, that number is going to increase based on a sliding scale corresponding to size of programs in July, 2018 assuming approval by the ACGME. How is that going to affect incoming radiology residents? I believe it will significantly increase the productivity and efficiency of residency programs on issues as wide ranging as educational conferences, evaluations/assessments, milestones, and more… It has been long since overdue.

Summary

As I see it, these are some of the most pressing issues tackled at the AUR conference. There are certainly other issues faced by academic radiology programs. Some of them mentioned at the conference and others largely ignored. There is a bit of good and bad news from this conference for everyone involved in radiology residencies throughout the country. Until next year at the AUR meeting in Nashville, Tennessee!!!

Posted on

Five Reasons Why The First Year Of Radiology Residency Can Be The Most Difficult

first year

Second-year radiology residents become overwhelmed and burdened by call. Third-year radiology residents feel exhausted from studying for their core radiology examination. And, the fourth-year radiology residents fret about all the things they need to know before starting their career. But, what about the plight of the first-year resident? Many non-radiology physicians and some long-practicing radiologists think that these residents have it easy since he does not have many responsibilities. He can merely sit and watch the radiology attending to learn the practice of radiology, right? However, in this post, I am going to dispel that notion. I will go through five reasons why I think the 1st year of radiology residency is usually the most difficult.

Little Medical School Background In Radiology

Unlike internal medicine, surgical, ob/GYN, and psychiatric residents, most beginning first radiology residents have had almost no experience in the mechanics of all things radiology. Sure, they take a few courses during medical school. However, they are usually surveys. Also, they do not provide the vast experiences needed to function as a full-fledged radiology resident.

On the other hand, internal medicine residents have worked up patients with histories during their medical school training. Ob/GYN residents have usually delivered a few babies in medical school before beginning. Surgical residents have assisted in multiple surgeries and have worked the floors before their first day of residency. And psychiatry residents have interacted with numerous patients before starting. These initiated residents can almost entirely function from day one.

Instead, new 1st-year radiology residents cannot dictate, review films to be read, or finish the procedures that we perform daily. Since a first-year radiology resident cannot complete most of the functions to be “of use” to the senior radiologist, many first residents feel inadequate until they can begin call as a second-year. At that point, they can function much more independently. However, the lack of training certainly can make for a problematic initial year.

Incredible Amounts of Reading For The First Year

More so than other specialties, radiology requires a boatload of reading during the first year. You need to understand internal medicine, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, orthopedics, neurology, and more to become a respectable radiologist. Unlike other specialties, you cannot get away with little reading and learn only from your experience with others. If you do not read for hours every day, you will fall behind and not pass the core examination. Many residents do not know the requirements before starting and take a long time to adjust to the nightly reading regimen, a painful process.

Dictations- A Difficult Road

Imagine your frustration as you first start with never having held a Dictaphone. You click the wrong buttons and feel unsure of yourself as you talk into a stick!!! This routine is typical for the first year that starts to dictate. Not only does the first-year resident have to get the physical mechanics of learning dictation, but they also have to create a report that makes sense. This process often occurs with little instruction or regimentation. It becomes hard to put ourselves in the shoes of the first-year resident. However, as an associate residency director, I regularly recognize how hard it is to start from scratch what we routinely do as radiologists daily.

Frustrated Attendings Who Don’t Want First Years Around

Unlike more independent senior residents, radiologists typically have to take extra time out of their day to teach a first-year radiology resident. Given the increasing workloads of radiologists, many attendings see this as a burden. They would instead get home to their family on time in the evening. Additionally, the attending does not know the first-year resident well. Therefore, he cannot figure out how much responsibility to give. Other radiologists feel forced and have no desire to teach. The frustrations of many attending radiologists reflect in the personal interactions with the first-year resident. Often, the resident gets the sense that he/she is not wanted around. Depressing, huh…

Noon Conferences- A Foreign Language

Have you ever listened to a conversation in a language that you do not understand? That is the feeling that the first-year radiology resident often gets when he/she goes to the first noon conference. Attendings give noon conferences on topics such as ultrasound or MRI. Yet, these radiology residents have never seen these images. On top of that, they use language that is not common vernacular.

Moreover, the findings are incomprehensible to the uninitiated resident. Many attending radiologists do not recall what it is was like to attend these conferences. However, these esoteric conferences are standard for first-year residents.

The Final Upshot For The First Year Resident

Senior radiologists can easily dismiss and forget the challenges that first-year radiology residents face. However, please don’t discount the first-year radiology resident’s frustrations, experiences, and anxieties, as they are genuine. It takes an extended period of adjustment to acclimate to the daily work experienced by radiology residents and attendings. Give the lowly first-year radiology resident a chance!!!