Year: 2018

Posted on by

A Rarely Utilized But Effective Tool To Make Sure A Residency Program Is Reputable

residency program

Recommendations for “good” residency programs about where to apply are a “dime a dozen.” Residents and attendings often give you their opinions about programs based on previous reputations. Or, perhaps, they attended or have friends within the residency. Rarely a faculty member knows the current residency program well enough to tell you if the perceived residency quality matches its current status.

Additionally, any program’s directors, chairpersons, faculty, and residents continuously change. So, these folks may know much about the residency from many years ago but not much about the current status.

So, how do you confirm whether a radiology residency program is reputable once you arrive on the interview day? To do just that, it takes one straightforward but rarely performed step: Ask residents and attendings from other departments within the same hospital about the residency program at the interview site.

Why Does The Opinion Of Other Department Physicians About The Residency Program Matter So Much?

Remember. When you apply for a residency, the residency has a vested interest in selling you a spot. The residency director, residents, and faculty want all applicants, regardless of rank, to select their program to get “the best residents.” So, asking a radiology resident or residency director whether she likes his residency is like asking a car salesperson if he loves the car he is selling.

On the other hand, other department members may work directly with the radiology residency. However, they do not have the same filter. They can say whatever they want about the program without being directly affected by the repercussions. Therefore, asking these fellow physicians can give you a more truthful answer.

Moreover, physicians within most other departments often work directly with radiology residents and attendings. So, they have great insight into the quality of the radiology department as a whole.

Why Do Applicants Rarely Perform This Step?

First and foremost, most residents never consider the option. Interview days are so chock full of activities that asking other departments would never cross your consciousness. You may also think you do not have the time to bother.

For others, however, it may involve stepping outside your comfort zone. It would help if you asked other physicians you don’t know about another residency. You may worry if they will even respond. But, you will likely find that most physicians will be happy to talk.

What Kind Of Information Can You Find?

Well, the information you may discover can be invaluable. What about a question to an emergency department physician like: Do you trust the reads of the residents in this program? This question can give you a lot of information about the quality of a training program. You will get a much more truthful answer than asking the program director about the program’s quality.

Or, how about asking the oncologists, do you get along well with your radiology colleagues? This question can tell you more about a radiology program’s culture than any pointed question you may ask the radiology residents or faculty.

My advice is to consider some pointed questions to ask after the interviews. And, then, try to find a few residents and attendings in another department to ask about these questions.

Making Sure A Residency Program Is Reputable

If a particular residency seriously interests you and you want to confirm its reputation, then you want to consider taking the extra time to step out of your comfort zone. Ask a few random attendings from different departments about the program. It’s a great way to ensure that the residency matches your expectations. You may find that all is not as it seems!

Posted on by

Radiology Book Favorites – A Local Poll

I thought it would be interesting to informally poll my residents to find out their favorite radiology book by residency year and share the information with the readers of the website. Why? First of all, I figured many readers have a vague idea of what books to read, but sometimes they purchase radiology books without checking out what their colleagues liked the most. Second, I performed a brief survey by residency year to get a more specific idea about what you may want at your stage of residency. And finally, I was hoping to find a few patterns (which I did).

Well, these are the basics about what I found. Core Radiology was the only book that all years found to be useful. Brandt and Helms and Felson’s were popular in all years except the 4th year. Otherwise, there is a smattering of favorites throughout all 4 years of residency.

Check out the results from my informal radiology book poll (the first of its kind on this website!) at the bottom of this blog in order of popularity for each residency year.

Let’s Create A Radsresident Favorite Radiology Book Poll!

And lastly, I thought it would be a good idea to also have you, the reader, take a survey to determine which books were your favorites. If we gather enough data, we can create another list compiled from all my readers. I think that this information would also be helpful to decide upon which books to read. So, fill out the survey at the bottom of the page to give your opinion!

The Final Results!

So, now I present you a list of the results from my informal poll with links to the same books on Amazon (where I am an affiliate!)

4th Year

Crack The Core Exam,  Prometheus Lionhart

Core Radiology,  Jacob Mandell

The Requisites: Vascular And Interventional Radiology, John Kaufman and Michael Lee

Fundamentals of Pediatric Radiology, Lane F. Donnelly

Fundamentals of Body CT, W. Richard Webb, William E. Brant, and Nancy M. Major

3rd Year

Core Radiology,  Jacob Mandell

Felson’s Principles Of Chest Roentgenology, Lawrence R. Goodman

Arthritis in Black And White: Expert Consult, Anne C. Bower and Donald J. Flemming

Essentials of Nuclear Medicine And Molecular Imaging, Fred A Mettler, Jr, and Milton J. Guiberteau

Brant And Helms’ Fundamentals of Diagnostic Radiology, Jeffrey S. Klein, William E. Brant, Clyde A. Helms, and Emily N. Vinson

2nd Year

Core Radiology,  Jacob Mandell

Brant And Helms’ Fundamentals of Diagnostic Radiology, Jeffrey S. Klein, William E. Brant, Clyde A. Helms, and Emily N. Vinson

Fundamentals of Skeletal Radiology, Clyde A Helms

Felson’s Principles Of Chest Roentgenology, Lawrence R. Goodman

Duke Review Of MRI Principles, Wells I Mangrum, et al.

1st Year

Felson’s Principles Of Chest Roentgenology, Lawrence R. Goodman

Core Radiology,  Jacob Mandell

Brant And Helms’ Fundamentals of Diagnostic Radiology, Jeffrey S. Klein, William E. Brant, Clyde A. Helms, and Emily N. Vinson

Duke Review Of MRI Principles, Wells I Mangrum, et al.

Mayo Clinic Gastrointestinal Imaging Review, C. Daniel Johnson

Gray’s Clinical Neuroanatomy: The Anatomic Basis For Neuroscience, Elliot L. Mancall, and David G. Brock

Fundamentals of Skeletal Radiology, Clyde A Helms

Fundamentals of Body CT, W. Richard Webb, William E. Brant, and Nancy M. Major

 

Please fill out the survey below if you want to contribute your opinion to the “best of” radiology list of books for all readers of radsresident.com. If you cannot see the survey for whatever reason, you can click on the adjacent link that will take you directly to the survey site. Once again, thanks!!!

 

 

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RRLT759

 

Create your own user feedback survey

Posted on by

Radexam- A Bridge To Getting Rid Of The Core Exam?

For years and years, programs throughout the country have been utilizing the ACR in-service exam as a way to find out if residents have been keeping up with the material. And, from my experience, the correlation of the test with the Dow Jones Industrial Average on any given day is higher than that measure. And, many program directors believe the same. Now, for the past year or so, programs throughout the country have been utilizing the new Radexam to drill down on radiology topics to check the same measures. But, is this exam all that it cracked up to be and what do we know about it? What would be the optimal exam if I had my druthers? Should we be using any monthly or annual review to test residents at all? Or, perhaps, we should eventually overhaul the current core exam process in favor of Radexam-like alternative?

What We Know About Radexam Currently

Unlike the previous in-service examination, the ACR created Radexam as a crowdsourced evaluation tool. Academic radiologists are constantly vetting the questions. Also, dissimilar to the in-service, the exam evaluates the resident based on her specific rotation. You will be able to tailor particular question banks to your individualized monthly requirements at your institution, whether modality or topic based. If you have a cardiovascular MR rotation, theoretically, you can create an exam that tests on that rotation. And finally, you can evaluate residents with this tool on a monthly basis.

After I have seen an exam from the batch, the test looks hopeful as a tool for making sure that residents are keeping up with the material. But, the only way to know for sure is to correlate the test with resident evaluations and the core examination. That should be coming to a theater near you soon!

The Optimal Exam

OK. Deciding upon the optimal exam is a tough one. But, let’s give it a whirl. Well, first and foremost, we have to remember the purpose of an examination for residency. And, no the target of an exam is not to correlate with board passage rates. Instead, we should be thinking farther down the road. Is the test evaluating residents on the skills that they will need to become a good radiologist? Test authors often get hung up on creating an exam for the exam’s sake and forget about this end purpose. If I were a test creator, I would have none of that.

What else? Well, I would create an examination such that if you were able to pass it, you could demonstrate to your government, colleagues, and patients that you have the necessary skills to practice radiology. Forget about curves and complicated statistical mumbo-jumbo. I would not care if the pass rate was 87 percent, 100 percent, or 2 percent. All I care about is that our residents have the abilities and skills that they need to practice. In the end, that is all the public should care about too.

Additionally, it would not happen at one sitting. No more travel to Chicago, Tuscon, etc. Instead, you would take it continually throughout your residency at your program as a way to show you have gradually mastered the competencies that you need to practice.

Finally, the exam should be relatively reasonably priced on resident budgets so that they can afford the fees to create it. Theoretically, this is a tough one, I know. But, with large amounts of student debt racked up over medical school and residency, it cannot be more critical.

How Does Radexam Match Up To The ABR Core Exam?

Well, this is the million dollar question that residency directors throughout the country are trying to answer. The success or failure of this exam hinges on this answer. Unfortunately, we don’t know the answer to this right now. But, I suspect that the correlation will be higher than the previous in-service exam. It does not take much. So, in that respect, you would be able to call it a success.

Advantages Of A Monthly Exam Versus Annual Exam

The more often that we evaluate a resident during residency, the more likely that we can closely follow the learning process. On the downside, however, no one likes to be placed underneath a microscope at all times. Additionally, testing creates an artificial environment that differs from the day-to-day practice of radiology and medicine in general. But overall, the more often you test, the better you can check to see if the resident is completing the learning tasks necessary to become a radiologist. And, that brings me to my next and final thought.

Should We Consider Overhauling The Core Exam And Replacing It With Radexam?

If the core exam, as we know it, does not satisfy many of the criteria for an optimal examination, should we consider looking for alternatives? I believe that the curt answer is yes. And, Radexam may fit the bill if we drill down on it a bit.

First of all, it tests residents more often than a core exam, so that it allows a more accurate evaluation of the resident’s medical knowledge and skills throughout residency. Second, you can have residents take it on a home computer in a more realistic setting instead of some impersonal test center of some sort, leading to test-taking anxieties. Third, Radexam is crowdsourced and overhauled continuously throughout the year. Instead, the core exam questions are vetted, but only at a few intervals. And, finally, you can attune the Radexam to your program. Not all programs teach the same material throughout the country. Moreover, not all the content on the core exam will be relevant to your future practice of radiology. Radexam may resolve that issue.

Final Thoughts About The Radexam

We are still not quite there yet when it comes to knowing about exactly how Radexam will play out. In any case, I am hopeful that the outcomes will match up with the medical knowledge and skills that residents need to learn. And, as a bonus, I also would like to see a better correlation of Radexam with the core exam outcomes. (which I think we will) If these correlations are high, perhaps, we should consider Radexam as an alternative to entirely replace the in-service that we use right now and maybe sometime down the road, the core exam. Although no test is perfect, many of its features are significantly closer to my optimal examination than the current ones. Let’s start the debate to consider our best options.

 

 

Posted on by

Can I Get Into Radiology With Poor COMLEX Scores?

Question:

 

Hello Dr. Barry Julius,

I am a 4th-year osteopathic medical student that is struggling to figure out how I can pull off getting into a radiology residency with disappointing COMLEX scores and a completely sub-par application.

Background:

I finally realized what I wanted to do in medicine and now I fear it’s too late. I come from a surgical background having been a Certified Surgical Technologist and First Assistant for ten years before getting to medical school. I realized during my 3rd year that I didn’t want to be a surgeon.

I fell in love with radiology during my ER rotation this year. I loved feeling like I was finally helping patients by reading films. So many times, I felt like I never got to the root of a patient’s problems in internal medicine and family medicine but with radiology, I felt like I was solving a problem. As soon as the radiology bug bit me, I immediately started researching requirements for getting into a diagnostic radiology residency. This task broke my heart into a million pieces. All I found was how competitive the programs were and how essential board scores were.

Main Problem

Passing COMLEX level 1 was the hardest thing I’ve had to do in medical school. I failed twice and finally barely passed on my 3rd attempt. I’m both ashamed and proud of how many times took the exam. I’m proud because I never considered quitting. Medicine has always been my passion, and nothing would ever make me give up on the dream of becoming a physician. I never felt like COMLEX was ultimately going to defeat me.

I’m also proud because I learned a lot about how to study and how I learn best. I’m ashamed because it made me feel like I wouldn’t make a great physician. Many mentors and patients have told me that I would make a fantastic physician. In my heart I know I would.

My Current Situation

I made friends with the radiologist at the hospital where I did my ER rotation, and I’m doing an elective rotation with him starting next week. I’m really excited about this opportunity but lingering in the back of my mind is maybe I have no chance of getting into a radiology residency. Tons of people have told me there is no way to salvage my situation, but I can’t accept that. I’m a fighter and always have been.

Even if you never reply to this message I honestly appreciate the chance to vent. The bottom line is, I will never give up trying to achieve what I want especially now that I’m so passionate about it. After reading some of your posts, I just wanted to know what you would do in my situation. What is your advice for someone like me, with a worthless application, but a strong drive to do whatever is necessary to achieve a goal?

 

Regards,

Worried Radiology Applicant

 

Answer:

Sorry, I have been unable to get back to you sooner. It has been a crazy week. However, I have had some time to mull the issues that you present in the letter and I have come up with a potential solution. But, it will take some soul searching, grit, and determination.

Why are the medical school exam board exams so critical for radiology residencies? Simply because the radiology boards is also a multiple choice question computer exam that is difficult to pass. And, most residencies would not want to commit resources to a resident that will not be able to pass the boards.

Get To The Bottom Of The Situation

So, this is what do you need to do. First, you need to figure out why you have such a hard time with the exam. This may be the most difficult part for you, to admit there may be a psychological problem with test taking to begin with. Many times this is a simple issue that can be easily solved. They have testing psychologists that can get to the root cause. It would be well worth your time to splurge a few thousand dollars now to get the answer that may save you hardship down the road.

For some, the issue can be solved with something as simple as anxiety exercises before the test. For others, it could be a learning disability that you were not aware of. Regardless, make the time and effort to complete this step. It will be well worth it.

USMLE: The Solution

Second, you need to take the USMLE. The good news for you: Most radiology residencies do not like to use the COMLEX as a screening tool. So, if you were to do well on the USMLE, they would never even care about your score on the COMLEX.

So, finally, I would dedicate a year to studying for the USMLE exams and doing well on them. How would I approach it? I would take a year of research in radiology to stay involved in the field. And, I would study at the same time so that you can get the scores you need.

Bottom Line

It will take a lot of from you to really tackle the issue of passing the USMLE and getting into radiology residency. But, if you really want it that bad, there is a way.

Regards,
Barry Julius, MD

 

Posted on by

What Does It Mean To Be One Of The Successful Radiology Residents?

successfui radiology residents

So, your residency director begins to talk about his most successful radiology residents over the past ten years. But what does that mean exactly? And do you want to be part of that list? Well, maybe or maybe not.

Most of the time, the resident’s and program director’s expectations align precisely. But other times, the definition of a successful resident from a residency director’s perspective may vary widely from yours. In this light, we will talk about the expectations of a residency director and your expectations of the meaning of a “successful” radiology resident. Moreover, we will look into those conflicts of interest that may arise between the two expectations.

Residency Director Expectations

So, what makes a residency director happy with his residents? Well, for many directors, it comes down to reducing the heavy workloads. And, to keep their work to a minimum, most residency directors want their residents to comply with the basic expectations of a radiology residency program during the four years. In other words, these are some of the phrases that a residency director would want to apply to their best residents.

1. Passes the core exam on the first try

2. Completes all the necessary work on his own

3. Doesn’t create too much noise during residency.

4. Is expeditious with his work

5. Gets along well with others

6. Completes fellowship after residency

7. Enters academics and has a radiology career

8. Creates his research projects independently

9. Continues to produce research independently after graduation

 

Radiology Resident Expectations

On the other hand, what does a resident think would make the best sort of resident during his training? Here are some short descriptive sentences.

1. Reads enough during residency to have a good background for his career

2. Experiences and learns about all the procedures and modalities in the field.

3. Gets along well with colleagues and attendings

4. Makes connections for fellowship and beyond

5. Does not get sued

6. Can find a quality job in a desirable location with reasonable income after his residency

 

What Are The Potential Conflicts Of Interest Between The Resident’s and Program Director’s Expectations?

Research

The program gains more clout for a residency director when it produces large amounts of academics. For one, the Radiology Review Committee/ACGME will be much less likely to cite a residency if they have sent many abstracts to national conferences and have written numerous publications. On the other hand, many residents can care less about pursuing research and utilize it only as an avenue to graduate residency.

Making Noise

Often, residency directors like the status quo. To accomplish this, they would rather have their residents go through the motions of completing their work without changing the system. It becomes a less complex pathway with fewer chores to do. However, on some occasions, by not vocalizing educational issues, radiology residents may sacrifice their education and career. So, the resident may not find it appropriate to maintain silence.

Finding A “Good” Job

Sometimes, the program director’s definition of an acceptable career choice differs widely from his radiology residents. For instance, she may expect residents to go on to academic or prestigious private practice careers to maintain the “lineage” of the program. Nevertheless, the best career pathway may not always apply to each resident who comes through the system. Some residents may have business interests or may not have the desire to enter a typical career.

Taking And Passing The Boards

For most residents, completing the radiology boards become a critical step to obtaining a desirable job. And it also adds to the positive statistics of a program. But sometimes, passing the big exam is unnecessary to get the career the radiology resident wants. Perhaps, they want to enter the business world. Or, they have a job lined up in some other area. Taking and passing a board may become less critical to this resident than the radiology program.

Bottom Line About “Successful” Radiology Residents

The program director’s and the radiology resident’s expectations of the “successful” resident usually align. However, occasionally they don’t match up. It’s like parenting. Sometimes, we need to let our residents take an untraversed pathway. We, as program directors, cannot always force our residents down the same well-trodden trails. And radiology residents should not expect that they always need to perform the desired requirements. Instead, radiology residency directors, residents, and the external regulating bodies should redefine their expectations for success with the understanding that “successful” residents do not always fit an identical mold.

 

 

Posted on by

Halloween Special: Ten Scariest Radiology Resident Situations

In honor of today’s holiday, here is the second radsresident annual Halloween special: a top ten list of the scariest situations for radiology residents! See if you agree…

 

halloween

1. Taking your first night of call

2. Failing the core exam

3. Getting called into the program director’s office

4. Making your first significant miss on a film

5. Taking your first case at noon conference

6. Being unable to obtain a recommendation for fellowship.

7. Receiving a subpoena from an attorney

8. Getting chewed out by your faculty in front of your colleagues.

9. Falling asleep at nighttime while working and not getting up before morning readout.

10. Picking up the phone from the ER to find out you are not reading fast enough.

 

 

 

Posted on by

Why A Strong Department Chair Is Critical To Residency

chair

As an associate program director, I work with all the residents and faculty. But, one role, in particular, plays an even more significant role in the quality of the residency than the others. Which one would that be? (Hint: Well, if you have not guessed it by now, you may want to look at the title again! The Chair)

OK. So, the chair is critical to running a great residency. But what is it about a chairperson that makes the role so important? Well, the importance of the position is what we will run through over the following, oh, say, 8oo or so words!

Backbone When The Going Gets Tough

Everyone, once in a while, events conspire to mangle a residency program. Perhaps, a resident decides to leave for another career, and the hospital wants to take away the residency slot forever. Or, the emergency department determines they no longer want residents to give the final dictations at nighttime. In any of these cases, you need a firm chair to prevent these issues from negatively affecting the residency program. Sometimes you need a leader to fight for your department!

Allocation of Resources To The Residency Program

What would happen if you had a chair that decided to commit more resources to non-residency-associated imaging centers at the expense of a hospital-based residency program? Chaos, of course! You may not have enough physical bodies to teach the residents. Or, the chairperson decides to stop giving the program directors administration time to run the residency program. Either way, the chair controls many of these outcomes. And, if she decides to allocate the resources to the outside facilities instead, the residency loses out.

Carrot And The Stick

In any practice, some physicians have more or less interest in teaching. But, what happens if some of the attendings decide that they no longer want to give conferences? Well, the chair has the practice’s long arm to ensure that does not happen. The chairperson can either decide to provide money or non-monetary incentives to make sure that the faculty performs. Or, she can remove incentives from staff members who do not participate. Either way, the chair’s ability to utilize her power directly affects the program’s quality.

Sets The Tone Of The Department

Let’s say your chair runs the department as a dictator. Or, he is always just trying to appease friends instead of doing what is best. What happens to the residency in these cases? In the first case, the residency program runs on fear and misery. And in the second case, nothing ever gets accomplished. Bottom line: the chair sets the quality of interactions in the department and the residency.

Liaison Between The Hospital And The Program Director

Some departments have a chair who does not communicate the critical issues of the institution to the residency. What occurs in these situations? First, residents may lose out on remaining compliant with national requirements such as hospital ACLS training. Or the radiology program may not fulfill its obligations to stay accredited. Poor communication between the hospital, chair, and the program director can become a nidus for a residency to implode!

The Ceremonial Function

Sometimes, a chair may decide not to attend essential residency functions. The chairperson may not participate in the residency graduation or the annual hospital ball. What does this say about the department? Do you think the hospital will look fondly upon the residency program when its leader is remiss? Probably not. In this case, the chairperson and department will be much less likely to receive the resources they need from the hospital. It’s a “give and take” relationship. So, the chair must step up and set an excellent example for the residency and hospital.

Residency Advisor

We, as program directors, often need to get a feel for how the faculty will respond to a change before implementation. And residencies constantly need to institute new requirements. But will the faculty buy-in so we can implement the new development? A strong chairperson who knows his department well can ensure you can fulfill your change. Moreover, she can guide what works and what doesn’t. Without serving this role as a residency advisor, a program director will encounter many more pitfalls during his tenure!

The Chair As Leader

In any medical department, a chairperson plays a critical role in running the specialty service and ensuring the residency moves along smoothly. So, when you decide to look into a residency department, observe the chair. Does he participate in the interview process? Can you get a feel for how he behaves toward the department? All these factors will affect you long after the interview day. A chair reflects the face and culture of the department!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on by

The Gestalt Versus Segmental Approach For Radiology Residents (Doximity Article)

gestalt

Ever watched an expert radiologist read a CT scan or an MRI? They gaze at a scan, digest the information in one fell swoop, and spit out impressive findings and differentials with the single Gestalt.

If the world’s greatest radiologists can do it this way, why can’t you?

Well, what if I was to tell you to avoid this expert radiologist’s approach? You might think I was crazy, even though it may be hazardous to your career! But this “Gestalt approach” is most likely the wrong one for you.

But why? Why does this Gestalt approach to films, used by expert radiologists, not work well for the neophyte radiologist? To answer this question, we will define Gestalt and explain why this approach can be dangerous for early radiologists. Then, instead, we will tackle why and how radiology residents should read films using the “segmental approach.”

Defining Gestalt

Let’s start by defining the principles of Gestalt. According to Wikipedia, these are “the idea that natural systems and their properties should be viewed as wholes, not as collections of parts.”

Radiologists use the Gestalt approach when they sense the findings and diagnosis without processing the individual steps. I like to think of the Gestalt approach like The Dog Whisperer, Cesar Milan. He can naturally sense the overall picture of a dog that others cannot. With this sixth sense, he can train dogs to do whatever he wants while mere mortals struggle to figure out exactly how to do what he does.

Why Avoid the Gestalt Approach When Starting?

Since you have not been practicing radiology for long, you will miss half the findings in the film. You don’t know what you don’t know. And, if you don’t look for a finding, you won’t mention it or find it. So, if you read a chest film and don’t know to look at the pulmonary arteries, you won’t find that case of pulmonary hypertension. The Gestalt approach does not allow for evaluating each of the individual sectors of the film to ensure you have looked at it.

How long have you been practicing radiology? At most, for residents, three or four years. Rarely is that enough time to build a network in your brain allowing you to look at a film rapidly once and then create a framework for arriving at a final impression of the study. You have not trained your eyes to search everything in the image in a short period. And, therefore, you will not catch everything.

Take it from me; the Gestalt approach is a fast way for a resident to look like a fool. When you review a case with another clinician, they will catch things you missed. What could be more embarrassing?

What Approach Should You Use?

Instead of the Gestalt approach, the beginner radiologist should utilize a segmental approach. What do I mean by that? The segmental system divides the film into individual parts. You then review the entire image until you have completed your search pattern. In essence, it is a glorified checklist.

In addition, the segmental approach can vary for each reader based on personal preference. For some, you may divide the chest film into quadrants. For others, on the chest film, you may look at the technique, the heart, the soft tissues, the bones, and the lungs. Whatever the pattern, it usually doesn’t matter except that you cover all bases. As a beginning radiologist, this approach will prevent you from missing critical findings. And you will look much more intelligent than the new radiologist that uses a Gestalt approach.

The Bottom Line About the Gestalt Versus Segmental Approach

The Gestalt approach does not work well for beginning radiologists unless they have a tremendous gift. Most learners cannot look at the whole to identify the abnormalities in each part. Instead, the new learner is more adept at looking at all the pieces to determine what went wrong with the whole. Therefore, until you have the experience to identify abnormalities with a glance rapidly, the Gestalt approach is a recipe for disaster.

So, create a great, all-inclusive search pattern to avoid missing individual findings. Who knows? Maybe someday you will become that great radiologist who uses that Gestalt approach!

 

 

 

Want to see the original Doximity version? Click on the following link!

Link to the Doximity Website Version

 

Posted on by

What Might Happen With A Residency Merger?

residency merger

Throughout the country, businesses grow to keep costs down. One of the ways that they accomplish this task is by merging. And, if you think that residencies are any different, you would be wrong! Similar to many businesses, you may have noticed that residencies have grown bigger and bigger over the years. While it was once rare to hold ten residents per year per class 30 years ago, a radiology training program of that size is no longer unusual. So, what happens if you begin a radiology residency program and it merges during your four years? Will the residency approach you like a second-class citizen? Or, would you notice some fringe benefits from the process? We will treat these issues and more as we summarize the benefits and downsides of a residency merger!

Benefits Of A Residency Merger

More Residency Resources

First and foremost, you may notice that soon after a residency merger, you may be able to rotate through new departments. Or, you may have access to a simulation center that you did not have before. Furthermore, you may find new grants for residents to start research projects. And you may have at your fingertips a more extensive staff to choose from as your mentor or research partner. That doesn’t sound too bad.

Increased Prestige Of The Residency Merger

Before the merger, you might be in a small community program without “name recognition.” Now that you are part of a larger entity, you may find that hiring practices that want graduates from high-powered programs may be willing to look at your resume for your first job. There is more to a name than you might think!

Faculty With More Time To Teach

Sometimes, faculty at a hospital may no longer have the responsibilities to run their program as they did before. You may find that the staff can now dedicate more time to teaching and residency responsibilities.

Downsides Of A Residency Merger

Loss of Special Programs

As programs grow, they relook at areas in the budget that they can cut so that the senior administration can save some dollars. Perhaps, your residency may have had different outside rotations that you no longer “need” since the entity provides the same service. Or, you may have had a foreign travel program that the original institution sponsored. You know what they say in business: “Cut the fat!”

One Program Director For Many Sites

No longer, you can go to the same program director in charge of everything at your one site. Now, you have one program director for an entire system. What does that mean for you? The program director may have less time to focus on individual residents. Instead, they have multiple sites to “keep in line.” So, you may find that the director caters less toward you.

More Bureaucracy In The Residency Merger

On that same note, now that you have a more extensive system, you may find it more unwieldy for the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for research projects. Or, you may have more difficulty getting reimbursed by the system for expenses. With a larger institution, you exponentially multiply the “red tape.”

Increased Traveling Distances

Now that you have multiple sites within a more extensive system, you will likely need to travel to each location. If you live in the city, you may need to go to work via subway, train, or bus. You may need a new car if you live in the suburbs across from your original hospital. Unfortunately, you have a new budget item!

Some Disgruntled Attendings

At most hospitals, the faculty does not like change. Moving around resident call schedules and increasing the responsibilities of the staff can induce resentment among the mix. So they may be less willing to participate in the residency process. Or depending on how the system arranges coverage, attendings may have less time to teach. No change is perfect!

Less Intimacy

Remember that three-person class you had before when you learned each member’s quirks and foibles? Well, that is no longer the case. Now, you will have to contend with colleagues and attendings you will not get to know during your remaining years of residency. When your program touted a small program feel during your interview, they didn’t meet your expectations!

Dilution Of Resources

You remember what your teacher taught you in kindergarten- you need to learn to share! Perhaps, you had a fantastic faculty teacher on service. Or, your program had a one-of-a-kind pathology rotation within the institution. Now that you have a more significant residency, you may have less opportunity to use these resources because they need to be utilized by a larger body of residents.

Change And Residency Mergers

Change is hard. There is no way around it. And, when you enter a residency, some alterations from a merger are beyond your control. But, as you might initially think, a residency merger is usually not all bad or good. Instead, it will afford you some new opportunities and come with some additional palpable downsides. So, what is my advice? Make the most of a changing situation. Learn about the new lay of the land. You never know. Now that your program has included you in a more extensive system, you need to know it well. And make the most of its new opportunities even though they may have some downsides!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on by

Do Average RVUs Matter For Private Practice And Academic Radiologists?

average RVUs

Question About Average RVUs:

 

Do you know the average RVUs per shift for radiologists and the differential between private practice and academic radiologists?

 

Thank you,

Wondering About RVUs

 

_____________________________________________________-

Answer:

I have not found a specific breakdown of work RVUs per radiologist regarding academic versus private practice. I can shout out to my audience and see if anyone has this information. Has anyone found any valuable data about this? If so, please write something in the comments section!) However, to figure out the average RVU per shift, you can take the average RVU of 10020 in 2023 (from Lifetrack Medical Systems) and divide that by approximately 200 days per year. (around the average number of days worked per radiologist) That would give you around 50 RVUs per day shift.

However, the question may not matter concerning practicality and potential job search. I know of private practices where they have a “lifestyle” practice and complete very low RVUs. Likewise, I know of academic centers where the radiologists work like dogs and meet ungodly RVUs. So, using this information to determine whether to go into private practice versus academia would be a mistake. You need to approach this issue individually, not on a global academic versus private practice basis. On the other hand, if you are using the information for research purposes, it may have an alternative use.

Assuming that you are using RVU data to look for jobs using this criterion, I would look at the specific RVUs of a group and, even more importantly, remember to also look at your particular role in the academic or private practice. Some “academic” centers do very little research and expect some radiologists to do almost entirely clinical work. Likewise, other private groups have a partial academic bent and are less heavily RVU-oriented.

Good luck with your search!

Director1

 

tomatoes