How to Choose a Radiology Fellowship
For some people, choosing a radiology fellowship is easy. They may have known they wanted to be an interventional radiologist or pediatric radiologist since they were 2 years old. But, for the majority of us, it is a more challenging decision. And, it is a decision that cannot be taken lightly. It has a direct effect on the type of practice (generalist or specialist), your lifestyle (academic vs. private practice), location (rural vs. urban), the types of people that you will see on a daily basis (direct patient care vs. indirect patient care), and more!
So, I have come up with some guidelines for making this agonizing choice. Some of this decision should be based on your personality, what kind of lifestyle you want, the desire to make a little bit more money, the need to be in a certain location, application competitiveness, and gamesmanship/trends in the different subspecialties. I am going to divide the radiology fellowship decision tree into these six parts and describe how you should utilize each factor in order to choose your future subspecialty area. Let’s start with the first factor…
You can’t deny who you are and you can’t let others make that decision for you. If you hate working with your hands, interventional radiology is not going to be for you, regardless of your attendings’ opinion of your performance. And, it behooves you not to decide to enter the field because you will be doing what you hate. Likewise, if you can’t stand being near patients, mammography is certainly not an appropriate specialty, even if you are great with people. When you take your personality type into consideration, you’ve already significantly limited the playing field.
I am going to list several personality types and make a list of the appropriate possible specialties for you. Your own personality type may differ from the ones listed below. If that is the case, you should think about your own personality type and come up with a different cluster of several different fellowship options.
Gregarious and outgoing- General Radiology, Interventional Radiology, Mammography, Pediatric Radiology
Fiercely independent- General Radiology, Interventional Radiology, and Neuroradiology
Introvert- Body Imaging, MSK Radiology, MRI, Trauma and Emergency Radiology
Jack of all trades- Body Imaging, MRI, Nuclear Medicine
Likes working with hands/interventions- Body Fellowship, Interventional Radiology, Mammography/Women’s Imaging
Nurturing and friendly- Mammography/Women’s Imaging, Pediatric Radiology
Techie- Body MRI, Informatics, Interventional Radiology, Neuroradiology (Interventional and Nonintervention), Nuclear Medicine
And so on and so forth…
So, you’ve decided upon your personality type… Next issue is what kind of lifestyle do you want. When I mean lifestyle, I am thinking about the following factors. Do you want to be academic or nonacademic? Interested in becoming the “go-to-guy” for your specialty because you know a specific subspecialty in depth? Do you mind being on call late at night? Do you want to be in a small or large practice? So let’s go through each fellowship option and determine the lifestyle factors of each of these subspecialties. Add these factors to the personality factors in order to hone your choice of subspecialty further.
Most often practices general radiology without mastery of a single subspecialty area, Allows for academic and nonacademic possibilities, Can practice in a very small or large practice
Most often practices in his/her subspecialty in an academic and large practice, Master of single subspecialty
Needs to work in a large or academic center, Allows for the increased possibility of entry into the business domain, Master of individual subspecialty
Allows for the practice of general radiology or mastery of individual subspecialty, Allows for small or large practice, Can be clinical or academic, Tendency for long call hours
Allows for the practice of general radiology or mastery of individual subspecialty, Allows for small or large practice, Can be clinical or academic
Most often practices in his/her subspecialty in an academic and large practice, Master of single subspecialty, Tendency for long call hours
Can work in large or small practice, Can be academic or nonacademic, Master of individual subspecialty
A tendency to be situated in a larger practice. Can be academic or nonacademic, Most often is a generalist
More often academic or related to a large practice. Maybe more predisposed to nighttime calls (i.e. intussusception reductions), Master of a subspecialty
Most often in a large or academic practice, most often a generalist, Tendency toward nighttime work
More options for part-time hours and less call. Can be academic or clinical, Can be in a small or large practice, Master of individual subspecialty and less likely to be a generalist.
Fortunately, you’ve entered the world of radiology and all of its subspecialties within the United States tend to be higher paying than most other specialties. And, the distribution of salaries (1) is fairly equal among all subspecialties. However, there is a slight discrepancy/increased income in the interventional-based subspecialties such as Interventional Radiology and Neurointerventional Radiology, mostly based on the amount of time working rather than bringing in more income. Money should, therefore, play a minor role in the decision tree.
Location can be an important factor in choosing a fellowship subspecialty because some fellowships may limit you to larger cities and/or academic centers. Take this into consideration if you need to be in a more rural locale for family reasons, etc. Remember this issue if you want to practice in the more academic subspecialties of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Informatics, Interventional Neuroradiology, Nuclear Medicine, Pediatric Radiology, or Trauma/ER radiology. This can potentially whittle down your choice of subspecialty further.
Competitive subspecialties cycle frequently over the years. For example, when I was a resident considering a fellowship in 2002, you couldn’t find anyone to enter the subspecialty of interventional radiology. Programs were desperate and would take anyone that graduated. Meanwhile, in 2014, the same specialty became an ultra-competitive fellowship and our residents had to send out numerous applications for the same spot. Therefore, if you have not performed well during your residency program or you come from a smaller program, you may have some difficulties entering a fellowship in some of the more competitive areas. Do not despair though. Most of the time, you can get into one of these more competitive areas. You just need to send out more applications and use your connections to your residency program.
Based on my recent experiences, some of the more competitive subspecialties in 2015 and 2016 include MSK Imaging and Interventional Radiology. But of course, that can change in any given year. You should still try to get into the more competitive specialties if that is what you desire. Just have a backup plan.
So you’ve gone through the first 5 deciding factors and you probably have whittled down your choice substantially, but you’re still not sure. There is still one more thing that you should probably consider before making your final decision. Currently, there are two secular areas of significant growth within radiology: big data/data processing and increasing applications of MRI.
Then, consider this. You are probably better off picking an area of growth than one that may be more cyclical and subjected to the vicissitudes of the economic cycle. It is simple job security. Informatics and the MRI-based specialties certainly meet these criteria.
Also, I have found over the recent history of radiology, you are better off going against the grain, just like a contrarian investor in the stock market. You may consider in 1996 when Bill Clinton was talking about the socialization of health care and health care capitation, radiology became extremely unpopular. Those same residents that applied to radiology around that time had an unbelievable choice of places to work. In addition, they could command their own salaries at the highest rate. And, most remarkably, they found work in the most desirable locations when they graduated in 2001-2003.
On the other hand, when radiology was extremely popular in the mid-2000s lots of really strong applicants applied for radiology. Those same residents graduated in 2009-2012 and were very limited in their job prospects. The same situation will likely hold true for many of the less popular subspecialties at the current time. Take the contrarian view into consideration as well.
Summary About Choosing A Radiology Fellowship:
Using these criteria, you should certainly be able to narrow down your choice of subspecialties to one or two different possibilities at the most. Good luck with your final choice!