Month: March 2017

Posted on by

How Does A DO Degree, COMLEX Score, And USMLE Step I Outcome Affect The Radiology Match?

I have a follow up question to your prior question on the USLME examination.

 

I am currently a 3rd year DO student interested in radiology but I got a USMLE step 1 score that was below where I wanted (227) but a decent COMLEX Level 1 score (591). Do you find that being a DO towards the lower end of board scores for radiology it will be hard to match to a program? I am above most of the cut-offs that I’ve seen (based on FREIDA Online) and am not expecting to go to a big time university. Frankly, I just want to train at a place that will give me a good enough education so I can practice radiology and feel comfortable!

 

I am just nervous about not getting interviews and going unmatched! But, I love radiology and will apply regardless and see what happens and go from there.

 

Thanks,
Alex

__________________________________________

Let me step back a few steps before answering your question specifically about your particular COMLEX Level I and USMLE Step I board scores.

 

First thing you need to know: It is true that there are a few residency programs out there that may not look at DO candidates in general. Those are the minority of programs. If you have a good ERAS application, most schools will want to interview you even though you are a DO.

 

Second item: It is good that you took both the COMLEX and USMLE examinations because some admissions committees don’t really understand what the COMLEX scores really mean, which puts you at a disadvantage from start. (You won’t have to worry about that obviously since you took them both!)

 

Third: DO degrees are being more highly regarded since the AOA and ACGME has begun to merge. The new merged organization has decided to get rid of residency programs for different specialties including radiology that in the past would not accept DO degree graduates. Previously for that reason, a graduate from a DO school was considered a second class applicant since there was a limited number of DO programs. That will no longer be the case due to the merging of the DO and MD residency programs. In fact, you will probably have a slight advantage over Caribbean MD graduates in the future since you are a United States medical school graduate and you do not have to worry about applying to DO specific programs anymore.

 

And finally in your particular situation: there are probably some large high end academic programs that have very high board cut off scores above yours. But, for most programs, both of your scores would be fine and should get you an interview at many places assuming you have a reasonable application and that the radiology specialty does not become significantly more competitive next year (You proved you have the ability to pass the core examination.) Not only that, plenty of high quality programs, programs that create great radiologists, should be willing to take you at “your board score level”.

 

My advice: Don’t be nervous about not matching. Be confident with the knowledge that your board scores are reasonable. That is one less thing to worry about!

Director1

Posted on by — 2 Comments

Radiology Private Practice Versus Other Career Pathways- Is It Worth “The Extra Money”?

private practice

The herculean question up for debate: is a private practice career path worth the extra money? To answer this question, you have to know your career options. Suppose you are talking about standard career options for the radiologist (not the alternative career paths discussed in a prior post). In that case, you can divide it into three main choices: private practice, academic/government, and the hybrid model.

Lucky for you, if you are reading this article and you are now making this decision, you have come to the right place. I have worked in the world of academics as a fellow and dabbled in private practice at my first job out of training at Princeton Radiology. Now, I work at Saint Barnabas Medical Center, where we operate with a hybrid model (I was also formerly a resident at a program with a hybrid model-Brown University). Since I’ve been through it all, I am uniquely qualified to talk about how to decide between each option. So, I am going to do just that!!! (Don’t let other posers fool you!)

Are There Income Differences?

What is the difference in income for an academic practice radiologist versus a private practice radiologist? If you look at the Medscape Radiologist Compensation Report from 2016 (later surveys did not have this information!), the academic radiologist made around 262,000 dollars (in this category also is included the military and government physician). On the other hand, some of the other private practice type radiologists made significantly higher amounts: the office-based solo practitioner- 434,000 dollars; the office-based single-specialty group practitioner – 386,000 dollars; and the typical hospital compensated radiologist- 381,000 dollars. So, suppose you take these debatably inaccurate academic and private practice numbers into account. In that case, a pretty substantial difference exists between the income of private practice and academic radiologists (almost 100-150 thousand dollars per year).

It’s Not Just About The Income Though!

But not so fast! In terms of numbers alone, the actual compensation may not account for other benefits like pension and health care. Employees that work for the government or large institution academic hospitals can sometimes receive substantial fringe benefits such as a pension of 70-80 percent of the final salary. Or, they can get incredible health care insurance that you cannot earn elsewhere. Finally, some have other perks, such as free tuition for children in college.

Moreover, the typical smaller radiology private practice will not give these perks. If you take the pension alone, that could amount to a guaranteed (0.8)(262000 dollars per year) or about 210,000 dollars for the rest of your life based on 2016 salary numbers. You would need to have 5.24 million dollars in the bank to have that kind of money guaranteed annually, assuming a 4 percent relatively risk-free return. So, the difference may not be as substantial as initially thought at first glance.

So, now that I have debunked some of the income-based differences (there are always exceptions to every rule!), let’s talk about the different models and decide which option is the right one for you. Let’s start!

The Academic/Government Model

In the purely academic or government model, the primary goal is not reading films and making money. Instead, you will need to publish, teach, or exist (if you are talking about a place like the VA hospital!). Prestige and promotion results from these activities. For comparison, the typical private practitioner couldn’t give a lick about these job requirements. The philosophy is often: publish or perish!

The typical academic sort writes a lot, obtains grants, and is responsible for his/her residents’ teaching and welfare. He/she typically reads fewer studies and sees fewer patients than a typical private practice radiologist. But, that may vary depending upon the institution for which you work. He/she gives many conferences, travels all over the country/world to give lectures, mingles with other academic sorts on all different types of committees, and plays a significant role in directing the future of radiology. Many of these radiologists have outside ventures and partnerships with various companies and academics centers since they do not only occupy themselves with the standard day-to-day role of reading films. Some of the associations may be based on their research or area of expertise.

The higher-up academic radiologists manage their staff as chairmen. These individuals may be responsible for budgeting, hiring, and firing depending upon the institution. Again, your mileage may vary depending upon the role that you have in the institution. The almighty dollar has less control over your day-to-day work. (Although many would say it still plays a nice-sized role!)

The Pure Private Practice Model

What about private practice? In general, private practice wants to maximize income and the number of patients that go through your system. Of course, excellent radiology businesses have an element of quality. But quality exists to increase profitability, and the almighty dollar tends to rule the day. And, of course, all roads lead back to the almighty dollar. Employees and owners grind out films daily, day in day out. The philosophy: if you do not work, you do not make money.

Now, of course, the private practitioner also accomplishes other activities in trying to make money. These folks may perform some or all of the following practice needs: advertising, buying and selling equipment, strategic partnerships, and mergers, maintaining relationships with hospitals, hiring and firing an army of numerous employees (possibly radiologists, technologists, janitors, nurses, physicists, and so on), maintaining and purchasing real estate, payroll, billing, legal issues, parking, and utilities. On the other hand, academic hospitals/ institutional facilities typically take care of most of these issues. Therefore, you need to enjoy playing many different hats and roles and being a self-motivated entrepreneur.

The Hybrid Private Practice/Academic Model

I currently work in this role. I like to think that I get the best of both the private practice and academic world. (Although some would like to say that is the worst!) The hybrid practitioner’s philosophy: A dabbler who enjoys elements of both private practice and academia, but not in such depth.

So, how does the hybrid model work? First of all, you have a few variations on a theme. In my situation, I am involved in a hospital-based private practice with a residency program and multiple covered hospitals and imaging centers. For another type of system, the hospital may employ you, but the hospital may tie you to the private practice world via output bonuses. In essence, the practice expects you to teach, do a little bit of research, and maximize your work output. Thereby, you create income by grinding through studies. Most of these practices are not involved in purely academic activities such as obtaining grants. And, you will probably not involve yourself in typical pure private practice issues. For instance, you will probably not need to maintain the building utilities.

The hybrid practitioner/dabbler likes to do a little bit of everything without delving into some hardcore academic and pure private practice issues. I was never interested in writing grants, but I certainly wanted to teach. I was not interested in dealing with some of the fundamental problems of private practice, such as hiring/firing technologists. Yet, I was interested in the mechanics of business and private practice. For the sort of person that likes to be a bit more generalist, the hybrid model can be a great career path.

How To Make The Final Choice?

I think the final choice becomes a personality-based thought process, not one based on the different income constructions of each career model. If you hate business in all forms, work for the government or academia. If you hate writing and teaching, a private practice may be for you. On the other hand, if you love doing a little bit of everything, think about the hybrid model. Bottom line: You need to be true to your self. Do what you like, not what others will think you will enjoy. If you follow these precepts, you will make a great choice and have a fantastic career!

Comments are welcome!!!

Posted on by — 1 Comment

A Common Radiology Applicant USMLE Step I Misconception

Ask The Residency Director Step I USMLE Question:

Good evening. My name is Susana, a 3rd-year medical student, very interested in your radiology residency program. I would like to know, if possible, what is the average Step I USMLE score of your PGY1, to know if mine qualifies for your program? Thank you.

Susana

_______________________________________________________________________

Answer To The USMLE Step I Question:

Thanks for the great question! It’s a common misconception about how USMLE Step I board scores are used to rank applicants in the match. The board scores are generally not about the average score, but rather the minimum cutoff. The point of using the board scores to help with the match ranking process is to make sure that the candidate can pass the written core exam taken at the end of the third year. And, that is really the only role of the board scores. Most programs such as ours take into much stronger consideration the Dean’s Letter, interviews, and extracurriculars once the applicant has met that specific cutoff.

At our institution we use a cutoff of 220 for the USMLE Step I. However, we have made multiple exceptions over time. First of all, if you perform poorly on the Step I Boards but do well on the Step II Boards, we will often ignore the Step I board scores or average out the two boards scores. Again, the point of the boards for us is the correlation with passing the core examination. A good step II score proves you can pass the boards. Also, if there are exceptional candidates that have other special activities, have had extenuating circumstances for not doing well on the boards, or have proven themselves already by completing a rotation with us, we will on occasion forgo using the cutoff. As an answer to your specific question, if I was to take the average USMLE Step I score over the past few years, it would probably be somewhere in the 230-240 range. But, again I think the average number is irrelevant.

Hope that answer helps!!! Again, thanks for the great question!

Yours truly,

Director1

__________________________________

 

Posted on by

The Alphabet Soup Of Residency Visas And The Radiology Alternate Pathway: A Guide For The Foreign Radiology Residency Applicant

Due to increasing governmental bureaucracy, static to slightly increasing numbers of residency slots, and increasing numbers of American medical student positions applying for residencies, it has become harder than ever to get a residency slot as a foreign medical student in the United States (1). That is not to say it is impossible to get one, but rather it is just significantly more difficult. Even though this is the case, since a large proportion of my readers are from foreign countries (approximately 1/3) and are interested in the mechanics of obtaining a radiology residency in the United States, I have decided to create a post about the world of visas and the radiology alternate pathway for ABR certification. Hopefully, this will be of some assistance to those of you with competitive applications and a burning desire to come to the United States for training. Also, I think it is informative and interesting for the United States residency applicant and radiology resident to understand what the additional requirements are for those that are applying from foreign countries.

In order to organize this post, I am dividing it into two sections. The first section will talk about the different types of visas with an emphasis on J-1 visas since this is the usual pathway that most foreign residents take to get a residency in this country.  I will also briefly mention J-2 visas and go through some relevant information about H-1B visas and green cards/permanent resident status. The second part of this post will talk about the alternate pathway specific to radiology and what requirements are needed to satisfy the ABR if you have some foreign radiology experience and are considering not going through a standard four-year residency. Finally, I would also like to give a special thanks to Debbie Paciga, our graduate medical education secretary, who was nice enough to take the time to share her vast knowledge on the topic of visas after many years of experience with numerous entering and graduating residents. Without her help, I could not have written this article!

Visas

J-1 Visas

A J-1 Visa is the most common type of Visa used by non-immigrant status foreigners for completing a residency program in the United States. Essentially, the J-1 Visa is an exchange visitor program for trainees from foreign countries. So, it is not expected that the J-1 Visa holder will become a permanent resident or citizen of the United States, but rather that the holder will be here for the limited time period of training.

Once the foreign graduate student has met the requirements of the ECFMG (Educational Commission For Foreign Medical Graduates), he/she can apply through the online system called The Physician Applicant System Access (OASIS) to obtain a J-1 Visa. However, the J-1 Visa requires a hospital sponsor in order to complete the application. The liaison between the teaching hospital and the ECFMG is called the Training Program Liaison (TPL) and this person accomplishes much of the work needed to obtain the J-1 sponsor. Typically, this person is a secretary or administrator whose responsibility it is to make sure that all the appropriate paperwork is submitted. This assigned person uses a system called The Training Program Liaison System Access (EVNet) on the EFCMG website to manage the application for the foreign graduate. Therefore, as a foreign graduate, you need to make sure that you are in constant contact with this person in order to complete all the necessary requirements for the J-1 Visa so that all the appropriate paperwork is submitted to this EVNet system.

So, what are some of the items that need to be submitted to obtain the J-1 Visa? You need to have a passport, a passport biography page, a curriculum vitae, a signed contract by the hospital and graduate student/resident with all the necessary information, the appropriate online filled-out forms (including the DS-2019 form- a form submitted by the sponsor), and of course all of the fees. Also, just as important, if you have a family that needs to travel to the country of the residency, you need to make sure that they have submitted a J-2 Visa which also needs to be approved by the sponsoring institution.

But alas, obtaining the J-1 Visa is not so simple as this… (It could never be that easy when it comes to anything that has to do with the State Department!) Each country has its own requirements for the applicant to be able to apply for a United States graduate education program. In fact, some countries have significantly limited the availability of these J-1 Visas. Each foreign applicant needs to obtain a statement of need from their home country embassy in order to be able to apply for the J-1 Visa. Some countries have severely curtailed the numbers of statements of need in order to prevent applicants from leaving their home country. The purpose of limiting the numbers at these particular countries is usually due to a lack of expertise or increased numbers of physicians needed in the applicant’s home country. These countries do not want applicants to leave their home country and emigrate to the United States but rather want them to train and practice medicine in their home country overseas. Currently, some countries that limit the numbers of applicants the most to obtain a medical residency training J-1 Visa include South Korea, Sweden, and Canada. Then, there are countries such as India and Pakistan that tend to issue as many statements of need as warranted. Of course, this is a moving target and can change from year to year depending on a country’s needs.

Other Miscellaneous Requirements And Issues For The J-1 Visa Holder

Once the J-1 Visa is obtained, there are numerous other requirements that the J-1 Visa holder needs to be aware of. For instance, the J-1 Visa holder cannot arrive into the country more than 30 days prior to beginning their residency. Sometimes, this can be a difficult issue since there is such a rush to get everything the applicant needs ready prior to beginning residency (housing, etc.).

Other recurrent issues include updating the J-1 Visa on a yearly basis with a new signed contract, obtaining recurrent statements of need from the home country of origin (sometimes the statements of need are time limited for less than the time of the residency program), and making sure to bring all the necessary documents when entering and leaving the country (up-to-date passports, diplomas, and so on…)

Applicants also need to beware of the legal system within the United States. The state department tracks illegal activities for residents with J-1 Visas on a yearly basis. Any conflict with the law can be a potential reason for the applicant to be sent back to his/her home country.

Finally, it is important to recognize that a research J-1 Visa is not the same as a J-1 Visa for a clinical residency. So, if you are a foreign national applying for a residency program, you need to obtain an entirely new J-1 Visa in order to start the program. (Whew, that’s a lot of stuff to remember!!!)

H-1B Visas

So, what exactly is a H-1B Visa and how does it work for the residency applicant? An H1-B Visa implies that you are going to be working in a specialty field/occupation that has a need for a foreign worker that cannot be met by a United States resident. The H1-B visa holder is permitted to stay in the country indefinitely, different from the J-1 Visa holder.

Typically, the hospital needs to sponsor an H-1B Visa for an applicant in order to get the foreign graduate into one of its residency programs. In addition, the number of H-1B Visas is capped each year, making it more difficult to obtain one. It often costs the sponsoring hospital thousands of dollars to work on an H1-B Visa due to the necessary legal and processing fees. So, for these reasons, an H1-B Visa is an uncommon route for the foreign radiology resident applicant. At our institution, it has been only used for exceptional circumstances. One example would be an applicant that is already in a program in the institution but cannot get a J-1 Visa because this person has a D.O. degree and is from Canada. (Apparently a D.O degree does not qualify for the J-1 Visa pathway). Since it is a rarely used method for foreign applicants to obtain a radiology residency, I am going to limit discussion on this topic

Green Card/Permanent Resident Status

Finally, the goal of some foreign resident applicants is to declare permanent residency within the United States in order to remain within the country with a full time radiologist position and with the possibility of eventually becoming a citizen. The United States lists several mechanisms of obtaining a Green Card including via job offers, investing in enterprises, and self-petition (typically an individual of extraordinary ability). Many applicants will often get their green card once they have graduated from a residency program and have been accepted for a permanent radiologist position in the United States. At that point, the employer is required to file a petition for the employee so that he/she can undergo the application process and the applicant needs fill out the appropriate paperwork. Usually, this process occurs only after the J-1 Visa is no longer active.

One other pathway to obtaining green card status includes finding a position in an underserved area for a period of time, usually 5 years. This applies to not only primary care physicians, but also specialists as well. But again, it is usually completed after the radiology residency has ended.

The Radiology Alternate Pathway

In a past response to a question from a potential foreign applicant in the “Ask The Residency Director” section of this site about the alternate pathway, I briefly went over some of the requirements for the foreign radiology applicant to obtain ABR certification. The question asked about applying outside the typical route of a four-year qualified ACGME radiology residency based upon the applicant’s previous radiology experiences. This process is called the Radiology Alternate Pathway. According to the ABR policy, the applicant can satisfy the requirements only at institutions with an ACGME-accredited radiology residency-training program. The applicant needs to have 4 years of continuous work in the capacity of a “resident, ACGME accredited fellowship, non-ACGME accredited fellowship, or faculty member”.  In addition, the candidate must also have “4 months of clinical nuclear medicine training.” The nuclear medicine training needs to be dedicated although the applicant can get the training at an affiliated institution if that is available.

The challenge for the foreign radiology applicant is to find a program that is willing to recognize previous foreign training and accept him/her for a slot in one or more of these programs over a four-year period. Many programs are not willing to make an obligation of four years of employment in a mixture of residency, fellowship, or faculty positions and will require the applicant to go down the standard pathway of radiology residency. That is not to say it is impossible. But rather, it is not common and represents the exception rather than the rule.

Final Thoughts

Applying to radiology residency and performing well in a radiology residency program as a United States citizen without having to contend with the issues that arise from migrating to a new country can be challenging by itself. I can only imagine the additional difficulties that foreign applicants face applying to and attending radiology programs within the United States. There are certainly numerous hurdles and hoops for these applicants. But for those with the desire, ability, and grit/determination, it is still certainly possible to go through the process of getting a visa and obtaining a qualified residency spot or spot in an alternate pathway program. If this is your life’s desire, don’t let these hardships dissuade you!!!

Helpful Websites For The Foreign Medical Graduate

ABR Alternate Pathway Information- https://www.theabr.org/sites/all/themes/abr-media/pdf/PWIMG_DRandSubCert.pdf

ECFMG –   http://www.ecfmg.org/evsp/application-online.html

Governmental Green Card Website Information-  https://www.uscis.gov/greencard

Governmental J-1 Visa Website Information-  https://j1visa.state.gov/basics/common-questions/

Governmental J-2 Visa Website Information- https://j1visa.state.gov/basics/j2-visa/

Governmental H-1B Website Information-  https://www.uscis.gov/eir/visa-guide/h-1b-specialty-occupation/understanding-h-1b-requirements

 

Posted on by — 1 Comment

Malpractice Insurance: What Physicians Need To Know

If you are just starting practice as an employee with a physician group, you may think you don’t really need to know that much about malpractice insurance. Few physicians have the resources available to defend against a malpractice claim when legal services can cost tens of thousands of dollars and damages or settlements can be hundreds of thousands of dollars. When deciding on a malpractice insurance policy, there are two types to take into consideration: a claims-made policy or an occurrence-based policy.

An occurrence-based policy provides insurance against incidents that occurred during the term of the policy regardless of when the claim is made. A claims-made policy covers the insured for any incidents that occur during the policy period, as long as the claim for the incident is also filed during the policy term. Neither of the policies will provide coverage for incidents that occur before the inception date of the policy.

Tail insurance refers to a policy that the insured can purchase when he discontinues his claims-made policy. The tail allows the insured to report claims for incidents that occurred during the time the policy was active (from the retroactive date to the policy expiration date) even though the policy has been terminated. Tail insurance is generally a onetime payment.. If a physician decides to change employment, wants to continue practicing medicine, and requires a new malpractice policy, tail insurance will be required to continue coverage for all incidents that may have occurred under the old policy. Many claims-made policies offer “free” tail coverage for death, disability, or permanent retirement.

Based on this information alone, it would seem logical that an occurrence-based policy is the best option. However, the two types of policies vary greatly. Depending on how mature a policy is, and the specifics of the policy, the sum of all claims-made premiums along with the cost of tail insurance can approach the sum of all occurrence-based premiums over the same period. If it can be determined that a physician will be eligible for free tail coverage (i.e., he is covered by the same policy through retirement), claims-made insurance is usually the most cost effective. If a physician knows there is a high likelihood of changing employment and malpractice insurance, he may want to compare pricing of the two options including the cost of the tail coverage in his calculations. For example, a physician may want to consider an occurrence-based policy if he knows he is going to work at a location for a short amount of time and will not be able to take the coverage with him.

What To Look For In A Carrier:

While premium costs can’t be ignored, a company’s fiscal soundness, claims handling, and sensitivity to policy holders are also important considerations. Ask about the carrier’s A.M. Best rating. Given the current state of the medical malpractice climate, a rating of A minus is good. Your state insurance commissioner’s office can provide information about insurers licensed in your state and may also be permitted to give information about complaints that have been filed against the insurer.

Posted on by — 4 Comments

What Clinicians Don’t Want From A Radiologist- The 8 Deadly Sins

clinicians

A few months ago, one of my readers sent me the following message, “I would like you to write about what clinicians want from a radiologist.” That comment initiated some thoughts about the topic since our primary goal, as radiologists, is to answer the clinician’s questions. But let’s take this idea from a different angle. At some point in our careers, we all have made cardinal mistakes that turn off our referring clinicians. What is more interesting than the mistakes that most of us have made in our career to teach us lessons about how we can avoid angering our referring physicians and make things right for them? So, let’s talk about what clinicians don’t want from a radiologist! (The negative tends to be more interesting than the positive!) Let’s give this a whirl…

The Forced Hand

In training and board examinations, our instructors tell us to write recommendations for further management. So, how bad could it be to recommend a biopsy for a thyroid nodule when you see a new one? An angry head and neck surgeon stomps up to the department and looks for you. He yells loudly, “Why are you telling me what to do with my patient. He should not be getting a biopsy in this condition!!!” Bzzzzzzzz… (Buzzer sound)

Pretty darn bad! When you write a recommendation, you have to remember that you often don’t have the full picture of the patient’s situation. In other words, there is an asymmetry of information between the clinician, the radiologist, and the patient. Maybe, the patient can’t lie flat. Perhaps, the patient can’t handle needles. Possibly, the clinician knows about an outside study that you don’t. Or, the clinician is privy to some other issue that you cannot imagine. By recommending a biopsy of a thyroid nodule without a caveat, for instance, you are legally forcing the clinician into having to investigate it further. In contrast, it may not be the correct management protocol for the patient. I have learned to be very gentle with my management recommendations over the years!!! Always leave the clinician a way out…

Indecisiveness

We write a list of 10 items in our differential diagnosis without additional comment- like a laundry list to give a “complete differential.” Days later, you get a phone call from the clinician- “I don’t understand what you are saying- what do you think is going on here?”

How can we avoid this scenario? If you have an extensive differential diagnosis, always state what you think is most likely and why. Avoid delving too far into the 1 in a million diagnosis unless you have a real sneaking suspicion it might be the correct one. Clinicians appreciate when you make your best guess since it often will steer the doctor down the right path. Too much information without direction can be harmful!

The Saucy Radiology Report

You are angry that the referring physician did an inappropriate workup on a patient performing iodine scan as the first test in a workup for a palpable thyroid nodule. In contrast, you know that it should be a thyroid ultrasound instead, so you put in your report the following statement, Make sure to order the ultrasound instead of a thyroid scan in patients with a palpable lump. The doctor comes storming in, “How dare you to talk to me like this in your report. It is a legal document!”

If you have an issue with a clinician, make sure to air your dirty laundry outside of the report. The clinician is correct. You are putting the physician in a potential situation with legal liability. This sort of comment does not belong anywhere inside the report.

The Discrepant Report

You dictate a case from the night before when the overnight resident was on call. In the morning, you find a pulmonary embolus, but you do not look at the additional documentation from the resident or the nighthawk. You do not call the doctors to let them know. Later in the day, the ER doctor walks up to the emergency department and says, “What the hell is going on here?” It turns out the overnight doctors did not call the study positive and sent the patient home. You didn’t notify the doctor!

Discrepant reports between you and other physicians can cause negligent patient care. Be sure to check all the information to make sure that all parties are on the same page. Discrepancies will occur. But make sure to notify all parties!!!

Is It Better, Worse, Or Unchanged?

You are following a patient with breast cancer on a CT scan, and you proudly discover and then mention a subtle liver lesion in your report. Next, you refer to the prior study, but don’t look at it. You also do not document the size of the lesions, nor compare the size of the abnormalities to the previous study. Two days later, you get a phone call from the oncologist, “What is going with my patient? I need to know if I have to change chemotherapy. Are the hepatic masses changed?”

Clinicians always want to know if their patient is improving, unchanged, or progressively worsening. These imaging issues often change clinical management and are of the utmost importance to the clinician. Always make sure to put these findings under the impression of your report!!!

Incomprehensibility

You look at a pelvic MRI on a patient with fibroids. The fibroids seem to be growing over time. However, you don’t check the report and click the sign off button. Before you know it, the dictation goes out to the clinician. Three days later you get a phone call from the doctor, “It says here in the body of the report that there is interval enlargement and in the impression, there is no interval enlargement of the fibroids. Which one is correct?”

Make sure to check for grammatical and logical statements within a completed dictation before signing it off. Very few things piss off a clinician more than having them read an incomprehensible report. An unclear story leads the clinicians down this pathway. Always check your work!!!

The Wrong Diagnosis

You are looking at a hand x-ray with a type of arthritis that you have not seen before. Finally, you decide to dictate the case without confirming the diagnosis via Google or running it by another clinician. You call it osteoarthritis. The patient gets treated based on your report. One year later, the patient is still not getting better, and the doctor sends a new film to another one of your colleagues. He comes up to you later in the day and states, “you dictated a case and called it osteoarthritis. It was a definite case of gout!!!”

If you are not sure about a diagnosis, always make sure to either look it up or run it by someone else. We are in the business of healing others. You should never have too much pride to make guesses when you can get the correct answer!!!

Not Answering The Clinical Question

You dictate a plain film of the chest, and you happen to see a lytic lesion in the middle of the thoracic spine and a pulmonary nodule in the right lower lobe. So, you put in your impression- MRI of the thoracic spine recommended for further characterization. 8 mm right lower lobe pulmonary nodule. A few days later, you get a phone call from the physician- “We already know about the bony lesion, and it is a known hemangioma as seen in previous studies. The history said to compare the lung nodule with the prior study. Please take a look at that!”

It is imperative to scour the history for whatever clinical question the clinician wants you to answer. This way, you can provide a helpful answer to improve patient care. That is the main reason we are here as radiologists!

The Eight Deadly Sins- Lessons Learned

As clinicians, we always need to self-reflect to improve our practice of medicine. There is no room for too much pride. We should continuously look for ways to improve our clinical skills, reports, and communications with our colleagues. I have just given you eight different examples of issues that can arise if you want to cut corners. You can easily avoid further carnage with your reputation, your patients, and your colleagues by remembering these situations. Use these examples as a template to prevent the eight deadly sins of a radiologist!

 

 

 

 

Posted on by

Teleradiology, A Risky Business?

It took years and years of hard work and dedication, long hours and sleepless nights, and the time has finally come.  You’ve got your home office set up, a couple of high resolution monitors, a few licenses and insurance in place.  You’re ready to take that leap of faith and get started in the world of teleradiology, right?

After all, entering the world of teleradiology seems like the dream choice for many radiologists.  Whether you’re working in a small practice by day, hospital at night, or trying to balance work and family, teleradiology can be the ideal choice for your primary income or to supplement your income.

Not so fast.  It’s 2017.  Just two decades ago, healthcare providers didn’t face significant penalties for improperly disclosing protected health information (PHI).  Since then, regulations surrounding the privacy and security of PHI have evolved to include strict requirements and corresponding steep financial penalties for non-compliance.

Where does this leave you? Is it far too risky to give it a try?

With security protocols and policies such as Information Security Risk Analysis, Information Security Risk Management Program, Information Security Audit Controls, System Activity Review Policy, Security Incident Response Policy, Data Backup and Storage Policy, Data Disposal Policy, Media Re-Use Policy, Workstation Policy, and Electronic PHI Movement Policy, is it best to stay out of the game?  You will also have to think about privacy policies such as PHI Uses and Disclosures, Patient Access, Accounting of Disclosures, Sanctions Policy, and Breach Policies and Procedures.  Don’t forget about the Regulations imposed by both federal and state authorities – there’s HIPAA, the Privacy Rule, Security Rule, HITRUST, The Omnibus Rule, Unique Identifiers Rule and the Enforcement Rule just to name a few.

Still ready?  Still have that home office, those high resolution monitors, various licenses and insurance in place?  Great!  Let’s do it!

But how?

My suggestion is, find a teleradiology company that has built a strong Data Security and Compliance Department.  A teleradiology company that has taken the necessary measures to secure Protected Health Information. One that is sought after by the larger urgent care centers, hospitals, and government entities because they have put these measures in place.  Urgent Care acquisitions are at an all time high.  These larger healthcare organizations are driving the teleradiology industry to be more security conscious.  If you want to be successful in this industry you will choose a teleradiology provider that is able to meet the expectations of these larger healthcare organizations.

This will be the teleradiology company that grows, and that contracts with the largest clients.

This will be the teleradiology company that safely and securely helps you realize the dream of becoming a teleradiologist.

Posted on by

Which Radiology Meeting Should I Attend?

radiology meeting

Residents need to make a big decision. At some programs, each resident can attend one academic conference during the four years of residency without presenting a poster or paper, all expenses paid. It may be toward the end of your tenure as a resident, and time runs out to take advantage of the situation. You can “go big” and attend the largest radiology meeting out there- RSNA. On the other hand, you may want to “go small” and consider a subspecialty meeting to delve into your area of interest. Or, perhaps you want to check out the academic conference and hobnob with the faculty at the most critical educational meeting- the AUR. How do you make this difficult choice? Well, if you are in this enviable situation and need to make a decision, this article is for you!!!

“Going Big”- The RSNA

Plan Ahead

RSNA is the radiology meeting that most radiology residents decide to attend. It is a meeting that has “something for everyone,” literally. Traditionally, the RSNA is the largest of all radiology meetings and covers every subspecialty within radiology. But this also presents a problem: how do you decide what to attend when you are there? Because of the vast conference size, I would recommend following a road map before arriving. Know what meetings, poster presentations, or other areas of interest you will attend before arriving. Suppose you do not outline a plan before arriving. In that case, you will likely miss half of the more relevant, informative, and exciting presentations since the conference is so enormous. The different activities can be far, far away from one another.

Lots Of Activity

In addition, if you are in the process of studying for the core examination and the timing is right to attend a conference, this may be the conference for you. There are usually loads of activities for residents, including review courses that may be helpful for the resident scheduled to take his/her boards. It is possibly even more important than the review course itself. You will also network with other residents in a similar situation, allowing you to learn the best resources to study for examinations and learn about other programs throughout the country. In many practices, at least one attending from your group will be present at this conference. Mingling with the faculty also allows the resident to take advantage of the possibilities of dinners or other engagements scheduled with vendors.

The one significant disadvantage of a conference like this one: it tends to be a bit more impersonal than some of the available smaller meetings. Impersonal may not be an issue for a radiology resident, depending on your fellow attendees and how you schedule your days.

“going small”- The Subspecialty Conference

My preference is this sort of conference. I usually attend the Society of Nuclear Medicine Conference every other year, an example of a particular subspecialty conference. I find that this conference is the best for learning the intimate details of a specific subspecialty. The newest information in subspecialties tends to get presented for the first time in these sorts of conferences.

If a particular subspecialty interests you and you want to choose a fellowship in the conference subject matter, you can utilize these subspecialty meetings to network with the physicians in the subspecialty. These conferences offer this possibility because they are smaller and give more of a “feeling of camaraderie.” Why? Conference members tend to be more involved in specific subspecialty activities with fewer numbers.

AUR Meeting- The Academic Radiology Conference

Every year in our program, the program has funded and allowed the chief resident to participate in this conference. It is a wonderful conference to find out the state of academic radiology throughout the country from a resident perspective as they have specific programs available for the chief residents. As a program director, I also tend to go to this conference once per year to keep up with the changes in radiology academics every year. (although I have not made it the past few because of Covid!)

In addition to the potential relevancy, the conference is not that large. It is hard to get lost at this meeting like you can at the RSNA. You can quickly get to know the players in the academic world. I would highly recommend this conference if you are interested in academics or are the chief resident in your residency program. Residents attending this conference obtain an invaluable source of information about all residency programs throughout the United States that they can share with their resident colleagues when they return.

The “Pure” Board Review/CME Conference

Lastly, there is the board review or CME conference. Usually, these conferences are for board review or a specific topic/selection of topics. In our residency program, many residents attend local board review courses before taking the core exam. It is a good resource as a means to review the information learned from studying.

Other sorts of CME conferences are also widely available throughout the United States and abroad. Typically, the attendees of these conferences are more likely to be fully trained radiologists. And, they want to learn more about a particular area or may want to travel to a specific destination. (I recently went to a conference at Disney World like this to learn about digital breast tomography!) In general, radiology residency daily conferences usually cover similar material. So, the yield of this conference for a radiology resident may be slightly lower. From my experience, most trainees that attend these conferences are at the institution responsible for the meeting.

Best Radiology Meeting To Attend During Residency

Like almost everything else in this world, one size does not fit all when deciding to attend a conference. RSNA is an excellent introduction to the world of conferences as it is the largest and the most general. Subspecialty conferences are great for networking, especially if a particular subspecialty or fellowship interests you. The AUR meeting is an excellent option for academic sorts and chief residents. And finally, board reviews/CME conferences are a great tool to review studies for the boards/core examination. Many decisions to make and so little time… Hopefully, this article will give another perspective on making this big decision!

 

 

Posted on by

Has Technology Ruined Your Chance Of Employment In Radiology?

Has Technology Ruined Your Chances of Employment in Radiology?

Among the many benefits of living in the Computer Age are the rapid technological advancements that continue to bring convenience and joy to our daily lives. From handheld devices with 24/7 internet access to cars that drive themselves, the future many hoped for (and dreamed of) is happening right now. But while the positive aspects of new technologies mostly outweigh the negatives, disruptive change naturally creates both winners and losers, particularly on the employment front. The medical field is not immune to this phenomenon.

In the recent past, victims of technological encroachment tended to be lower skilled workers whose roles could be easily automated. Today however, potential job automation targets include professionals in high-skill fields ranging from law to engineering to medicine. In short, automation is now “blind to the color of your collar”, according to Jerry Kaplan, author of “Humans Need Not Apply”, (https://www.amazon.com/Humans-Need-Not-Apply-Intelligence/dp/0300213557) a sobering book that sheds light on the uncertain future facing modern workforces.

All of this is a roundabout way of asking a very uncomfortable question: Are robots coming for your radiology job?

The short answer is no…but don’t let your guard down. Here’s why.

Today the poster child of artificial intelligence (AI), IBM’s “Watson”, can already find clots in pulmonary arteries. And unlike a busy radiologist who might read 20,000 or so studies per year, Watson is on target to review 30 billion medical images (http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/863127) It goes without saying that Watson’s only going to get better.

What’s more, a number of Silicon Valley startups are currently applying new technologies to automate and improve the delivery of medicine. One firm in particular, Enlitic, is even developing a deep-learning system that uses AI to analyze X-ray and CT scans. According to an article in the Economist, (http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21700758-will-smarter-machines-cause-mass-unemployment-automation-and-anxiety) Enlitic’s system has performed 50% better in tests than a group of three expert radiologists at classifying malignant tumors. When used to examine X-rays, their deep-learning system also significantly outperformed human experts. Of course, this emerging technology leaves much to be desired in the bedside manner department, but that’s what robot doctors (http://www.techtimes.com/articles/131870/20160209/will-robots-in-healthcare-make-doctors-obsolete.htm) are for.

Now before you go and trade your radiology degree for a barista outfit, consider the fact that according to most experts, including the CEO of Elitic himself (Igor Barani, MD, a radiation oncologist), artificial intelligence and radiologists aren’t diametrically opposed. In fact, they’re largely symbiotic. By design, AI will increasingly free radiologists from mundane tasks that can be automated, like reviewing CT scans for lung nodules. As Barani puts it, “tasks that can be automated should be given to the machine—not as surrender but secession.” This outlook portends a future in which radiologists are increasingly empowered to deliver better patient care, not supplanted by robotic overlords.

Regardless of what technology naysayers say, there will always be radiology careers for talented individuals (http://scpmgphysiciancareers.com/) to pursue. That being said, the role of radiologists will almost certainly narrow in the coming years and decades to one of inference, not detection — and that’s an important takeaway. With little doubt, the medical field will require fewer radiologists per capita because of deep learning technologies that simply do a better job of identifying anomalies. The successful radiologists of tomorrow will be the ones who can reduce AI-generated data into useful information that helps patients get better, faster. That’s not a future to be scared of; it’s one all current and prospective radiologists should eagerly anticipate.