Posted on

Can High Step III USMLE Scores Compensate For A Bad Step I And Step II?

step III

Question About Step III USMLE Scores:

Hello,

Would an excellent Step III score offset bad Step I and Step II scores? My Step I was 226, and my Step II was 219. Thank you!

 

Answer:

You have posted an interesting question. But, first, let’s talk about your scores. Your scores are not in the “bad” category. Typically, at our institution, a score of 226 on Step I can get you a foot in the door for an interview if everything else is OK. The step II score was a bit more marginal. But, the Step I score has shown that you have the potential to pass the core exam.

I agree that if diagnostic radiology becomes more competitive and institutions continue to use them for selection screening, they may slightly raise the bar. (although the score for Step I will be disappearing) That could make your scores not cross the threshold for acceptance for interviews. But, for now, I think many programs would accept those scores.

A Strange Situation Indeed

First of all, what is interesting, strangely enough, is that in the 12 years of working as an associate residency director, I have never seen the situation where both Step I and Step II are below 220 and step III is around 250 or so. And, I think I have a sneaking suspicion why.

First, very few people who score lower than the Step I and Step II thresholds will ever ace the exam in Step III. Additionally, we typically use cut-offs of 220 for either Step I or Step II. So, Step III is usually not on the radar because many residents typically don’t take this exam as “seriously and therefore we, as faculty, don’t either.” Why? Because the folks taking the exam are traditionally interns that don’t have as much time to study for it. So, the scores are not so critical. Instead, typically we care only that the resident has passed the Step III exam.

It’s Not About The Exam Itself

Again, to remind you, I am not a big fan of any of the USMLE exams. However, it is one of a few items that correlate with good core exam outcomes in radiology. And good core exam outcomes affect residency credentialing. So, unfortunately, all this talk about scores has nothing to do with being a good radiologist. Instead, it has only to do with the probability of becoming a board-certified radiologist. And, therefore, we are forced to use these scores as a screening tool for interviews.

Final Determination About Step III

In brief, to answer your question, Step III is the least influential of all the USMLE exams for receiving interviews. An excellent step III score will most likely not compensate for feeble Step I and II scores (which yours are not!)

I hope that answered your question,

Barry Julius, MD

Posted on

Do Board Review Companies Help With The USMLE?

board review

Not all students learn the same way. And, each method of studying has different pitfalls and benefits. For a distractible student, you need an isolated organized environment to study. And, a large group may not benefit this individual. As a kinetic learner, the action of performing a lab or dancing while reciting study material may allow you to absorb the material better. But, sitting in one place staring at a book may not work as well. My point is that board review is not a “one size fits all” activity. And I recognize that.

Moreover, in my experience, I have seen board review companies giving an unqualified boost to some test-takers in question. And, others who have not taken a board review course do just fine So, to answer the question posed on this post, do board review companies help medical students and residents with the USMLE, I will have to be a little wishy-washy and give you an unqualified maybe!

But if you are reading this post, what you are asking is will a board review company help me. And, perhaps, even more importantly, is the course a waste of money and time? So, another way to word the question would be, what types of medical professionals would and would not benefit from using a board review company? And, those are just the questions that I will answer!

Students That Benefit From Using Board Review

Residents Without Organizational Skills

What board review companies do best is to provide you with a routine and a defined way to study for the examination. They give you the material that you will need to make sure that you will pass the exam. For some students and residents, the course leaders’ material and the demands provide a bit more structure. Of course, a system and a routine can allow these test-takers to focus on studying for the exam.

Poor Test Takers

Some residents and ‘medical school students either develop anxiety or think too deeply about a question and perseverate for a half hour. Board review companies are good at making sure you understand the how’s and why’s of taking tests to improve your test-taking skills. What’s interesting about many poor test-takers is that they don’t necessarily translate into bad radiologists. In this situation, a board review company can provide a bit of a boost to your scores. It is most likely worth your time and money for that extra help if you consider how much more you will make in your lifetime.

Previous USMLE Low Board Scores Failures

They say that the definition of crazy is expecting a different outcome after doing the same thing again. Well, anyone that has not done well on a board exam beforehand should utilize the extra help to get you over the hump to increase your chances of acceptance into the radiology fold! Board review companies can help to change the way you study the next time around.

Students/Residents With Borderline Credentials For Acceptance

If you are a resident toward the middle or bottom of your medical school class, a higher score on Step I (Or now Step II USMLE with the new changes) can make all the difference between acceptance to residency/fellowship and rejection. Many residencies (and to a lesser extent fellowships) will use cutoffs in Radiology to ensure that the accepted class will pass the core exam. Why? Because there is a correlation between doing well on the USMLE exams and passing the core exam. And, a boost of only 5 points on your exam can make all the difference between capturing that interview and total rejection. It’s probably worth it to shell out that extra dough.

Foreign Applicants

Finally, if you are coming from another country, the programs will scrutinize your application more. Any advantage can help your case. If you have reached this far, you are better off taking a course even if it only increases your score by a few points. It may make all the difference!

Students That Don’t Need The Extra Help

Natural Born Test Takers

Yes. Some students and residents can take almost any test and pass it with flying colors. (Aren’t you jealous?) They have just mastered the art of examination to a tee. Based on the question itself, regardless of the information at hand, they can almost sniff the right answer. If that is you, then forget about board review. Save your money!

Honors in Every Course With Twenty Papers Already Completed

Check. Some folks have had an incredible academic record, and no matter what will get into the residency of their choice with or without excellent board scores. If this person is you, why bother to pay up for another exam?

You Get The Point!

I think you see what I am getting at here. Some folks don’t need to pay for that extra boost of a few points. It may not be worth the extra outlay of cash for those folks.

Board Review Companies Work Well For The Right Fit!

I know how painful it can be to shell out a bit more money when you already have umpteen gazillions of dollars of debt. But, sometimes, it is worth it to pay up for the additional help, especially if it may mean the difference between having a long career in the specialty you want. Having a guide that can get you through the pitfalls of studying for these tests is invaluable for the right sort of test-taker. So, consider where you stand and decide if it is right for you. Here are some of the more frequently used board review companies below that my residents have used to help you along with your decision. You can click on them if you are interested. I am an affiliate of both! (Princeton Review currently has a discount that expires on September 3!)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Academic Tutor LOL (24 hrs) – $180 Off!

Posted on

Didn’t Take The USMLE And Still Want To Apply To Radiology Residency!

USMLE

Question About Applying Without The USMLE

Hello,

Currently, I am starting the intern year as a categorical surgery resident. I know I would be happier as a radiologist, but now I am in a tricky situation. I am a D.O. with decent scores. Unfortunately, I did not take the USMLE (I entered medical school thinking of pediatrics, and my advisor told me to focus on just one examination). Even though I have not taken the USMLE, I have published research from undergrad in pediatrics from an excellent medical school. Moreover, I was a part of the medical honor society, a tutor during medical school, had prior work experiences, and plenty of volunteering/club involvement. I know the radiologist I worked with would be willing to write me a persuasive letter of recommendation.

As a student, I initially applied for general surgery due to a passion for anatomy, and because I enjoyed working with breast cancer patients. I thought I wanted to be a breast surgeon. However, I had the pleasure of working with a radiologist working in breast/women’s imaging. I loved it. Being able to detect subtle changes in breast tissue was fascinating. From the mammograms, stereotactic biopsies, and needle localizations, the days would seem to fly by. I couldn’t get enough of it. Never did I think I would be so interested in radiology, but without any prior exposure in the field, I would have never known. 

I guess at this point I am unsure what to do. The current hospital I am at does not offer a radiology residency but is a part of a healthcare system that is about an hour away. What is the best advice you have for someone in my position? Any help would be much appreciated.

Thank you for your time!

What To Do?


 

Answer

Dear Applicant,

As an intern in surgery, you are well within the window to change specialties from the standpoint of government medicare funding. But, if you make your decision to enter radiology too late, that may no longer be the case. Applying later will reduce the number of residencies that will give you an interview. So, there is no better time than now to apply for radiology, as that is your area of interest.

Also, you may not want to hear this. The best way to ensure that you will get a spot in radiology would be to take the USMLE Step I and II exams. Many residencies disregard the COMLEX scores. Now that the AOA has merged with the ACGME, the USMLE tests are the standard throughout the country. A good score on the USMLE Step I would go a long way to giving your application some more “street cred.” (Eventually, in 2022 the USMLE Step II will be more critical exam since Step I will be a pass/fail test only). 

If you only have the COMLEX exam, you will be limiting the number of residencies that will seriously examine your application. I would try to take these exams as soon as possible so that the residency programs will have your scores. (Not sure if you can fit it in before this application cycle ends, but if you can, that would be great!)

All the other stuff that you have done, such as research, tutoring, and volunteering, is excellent. But, everyone else applying for radiology residency has done the same. So, although you need to add it to your ERAS application, it’s not going to differentiate you.

A recommendation from a radiologist within a health care system that has a residency can still support your application. Even if there are no other residency programs within the healthcare system, it will still help a little bit (but not as much).

The bottom line is that all is not lost. It will take a bit of work to study for the USMLE Step I and start your application soon. If you can’t get those USMLE scores before the application cycle, you can try to apply regardless. However, the chances of getting into radiology residency will be a little bit less. I think it is still worth a shot because you don’t want to lose out on government funding. Alternatively, you can take off a year of residency and find a job in research. That would potentially postpone the medicare funding issue and allow more time to study for the USMLE. When there’s a will, there is a way!

Good luck,

Barry Julius, MD

Posted on

Now USMLE Step I Is Pass-Fail, What Do I Need To Do?

pass-fail

Question About Pass-Fail Step I USMLE:

Hello,

I’m going to be starting medical school this coming August and was interested in DR. Still, with Step 1 becoming Pass-Fail, I am not sure how to strengthen my application to Radiology Residencies. Do program directors value research/community research more than other metrics? Step 2 will likely become the new objective score by which program directors may filter applicants. I was looking for any other advice you might have for applying to a Radiology Residency once Step 1 becomes Pass/Fail. 

Thank you!


Answer:

First of all, I will direct you to my article on this topic called USMLE Step 1 New Pass/Fail Grading-Winners and Losers From A Program Director’s Perspective! – RadsResident

That should give you a bit of background on what I think will happen over the next few years. But, in your particular case, for a typical applicant from a regular U.S. Medical School, the most important criteria for acceptance to a program is and will continue to be the dean’s letter. So, anything that you can do to boost your performance in medical school will help the most.

As you have alluded to, the USMLE step II will continue to be important as long as there is a significant correlation between testing scores and the core examination. So, programs will most likely continue to use USMLE step II scores because they will most likely have some relationship with test-taking abilities. That will ensure that the residents in the program are more likely to pass the core exam. (Not that I like either the USMLE or the core exams in particular!)

Once you have taken these factors out of the equation, research becomes essential. Why? Because it shows that you are interested in radiology and took the time to complete a project to prove it. And, then all the other tangible and intangible factors play a role in our decision for acceptance (recommendations, other extracurriculars, interviews). And lastly, the personal statement is the least powerful of the admissions criteria.

The bottom line: Other than the test criteria changing from USMLE I to II, I don’t see much else changing in the selection process at the current time.

Good luck!

Barry Julius, MD.

 

Posted on

USMLE Step 1 New Pass/Fail Grading-Winners and Losers From A Program Director’s Perspective!

grading

Every year, program directors spend large amounts of time and effort in the application process to select qualified radiology residents. Currently, we rely upon sparse information to ensure we get capable residents. And, one of those pieces of data includes one of a few items that discriminate all applicants equally regardless of institution, nationality, or sort of medical school degree: the USMLE Step 1 examination. But, that stream of information will become even more meager. As some of you may have heard, as of 2022, this USMLE Step 1 examination will become a pass/fail examination. As a result, we lose out on a discriminator that can assess a resident’s ability to pass exams and correlates to passing our radiology core examination. Unfortunately, these changes render the test useless for our purposes.

So, we will need to rely upon other methods to select residents that can pass a radiology board examination. In this case, let’s take this issue on step further. How is the new grading system going to affect applicants? And, who will be the winners and losers? Let me guide you through what I predict will happen once the new grading system for this exam begins.

Winners

Ivy League Medical Graduates/Medical Schools

Since we are losing out on one of the few means of equalizing all applicants, we will have to rely more upon the “name” of the school rather than the individual data points. Therefore, known medical schools will take on higher importance in the application process. Regardless of quality, the system is forcing us to use the institution’s reputation over the quality of the individual’s data.

Poor Test Takers

For those folks with problems passing an examination, this change will help somewhat. You will have one less exam to obsess about your score, now that you only have to pass the test. Of course, you will now need to do well on the Step II examination. And, this test will probably replace the Step I exam as a screening tool for the ERAS application to our specialty. But, it is one less hoop for the average poor exam taker to jump through.

Step II USMLE Examination Review Courses

Now that acing the Step I examination no longer becomes significant, program directors will need to rely on another indicator for test-taking abilities. And, the only one left during the residency will be the Step II examination. So, this will force applicants to take this examination m0re seriously. So, you will probably see more Step II courses sprouting up to help applicants score well on this test.

Losers

Foreign Applicants

As program directors, we like to compare apples to apples when assessing resident applications. And, many times, it is harder to determine the quality of a medical school when it does not adopt the standards of the ACGME. So, we need to rely on other means to assess the residents. Now, we lose out on another data point to do so. Therefore, foreign residents will be the first to lose out in the selection process at the expense of other standardized medical institutions.

Radiology Program Directors

For several reasons, this will hamper our radiology residency selection process. First of all, we are losing out on one of the only examinations that correlate with passing the core exam. Therefore, theoretically, we will be accepting more residents that will not be able to pass a standardized test, the core examination. Second, we will have a smaller pool of applicants from which to choose, now that many of us will require applicants to take the USMLE Step II as our “test-ability discriminator.” Third, we will be more delayed in waiting for Step II exams to come in for the ERAS application. And, finally, we will have one less data point to use in our assessment arsenal.

Step I Pass-Fail Grading: Changing The Playing Field!

Tweaking the testing process always changes the outcomes for those applicants that take them. And, the new grading system for the USMLE Step I is no exception. In the radiology application process, there will be clear winners and losers. Foreign applicants and radiology program directors will get the short end of the stick. Meanwhile, Ivy League applicants and poor test-takers will benefit a bit more. And, to assess applicants, we will become more reliant on Step II USMLE examination. So, these are the main changes that lurk over the horizon. Get ready to change accordingly!

 

 

 

 

 

Posted on

What The Core Exam Low Pass Rate Does Not Tell Us About This Year’s Test Takers!

low pass rate

In residency programs throughout the country, you don’t need to go far before you hear some chatter about the low pass rate on the core exam and the change from years before. And, then, you take a look at the article on Aunt Minnie, with headlines stating, the ‘fail’ rate is rising. Or, you check out a forum or two or social media, as they rail against the exam and the test takers. It’s no wonder that many residents are on edge. I know that at my residency, the buzz is palpable.

Similar to other years, I have seen sketchy opinions about this year’s exam and misguided words about the residents who took the exam this year. But, given the increased failure rate, these statements weigh more on the residents who have taken the exam. And, unfortunately, many of the assumptions and statements made about this class of residents taking the exam and the test itself are entirely off-base. So, I aim to dispel any misconceptions by telling you what you should not assume about this group of test-takers and the core exam. Here are some of the more common ones!

This Group Of Test Takers Are Not As Smart

I know many residents who took the exam this year. And, although more residents had trouble passing the boards this year, these residents are just as intelligent as others. Perhaps, many are not great test-takers (reflected in the USMLE board scores used for admission to residency). But, by no means, are they going to make radiologists that are inferior to any other year.

Moreover, residents throughout the country in this class practice radiology competently as judged by faculty, chairman, and program directors. This judgment is in spite of the board score results. So, instead, I am forced to fault the exam itself, and some of the reported esoterica and minutia tested, not the folks taking the exam.

They Are Lazy

The residents of the class who just took these boards have worked very hard, if not harder than in years past. In my program,  some of these residents are the best since I started. Indeed, they have studied very hard for the board examination. But, by no means, should anyone call them lazy!

They Have Been Targeted To Fail The Boards

No, no, and again no. The ABR does not seek to fail more of any particular class in general; however, misguided any exam may be. Instead, I believe they have created a test that does not measure what it claims, minimum competency to practice radiology. The ABR did not specifically target this residency class taking this particular test.

There is No Way To Predict Who Will Pass The Boards

Interestingly enough, the Radexam pre-core exam did predict the outcome of the core exam results very well. Percentages on our pre-core Radexam mirrored the real exam almost perfectly. At least in my residency, it turns out that this test is far superior to the old in-service examination. I would love to hear the experience of other institutions as well since the Radexam is so new. Based on our experience, we will continue to take it more seriously. We will do so to make sure that residents have studied enough (and the right way) to pass the core examination.

Low Pass Rate And The Residents Taking The Exam

An exam is only as good as the material it tests. And, competent residents who perform well in my residency tell me about the many esoteric questions and minutia on it. Therefore, I squarely place the blame of the low pass rate on the core exam, and not the residents taking the examination. As I’ve written before, it’s time to start reworking the test and its questions. We need to change the material tested so that residents will remember useful content for years to come, not just spit empty facts on an examination and quickly forget.

And just as importantly, let’s stop putting all the blame on the residents taking the exam. Based on the judgments of our faculty, we already know that they are competent and will make great radiologists. We do not need a faulty test to tell us otherwise!

 

 

 

Posted on

Should I Address My USMLE Step II Score Drop In My Statement?

score drop

Question:

Hello – I’m actively interested in applying for DR residency, but I was let down yesterday after receiving a Step 2 score which dropped 11 points from my Step 1 (230 –> 219). I’m a DO student, and I’m afraid this will be a red flag that will become detrimental to my application for a radiology residency. I planned to address this score drop in my personal statement, as I’m sure programs will wonder why it happened. I believe my Comlex Level 2 exam went very well. However, I haven’t received that score yet, and I’m not sure PDs even care about it. Do I need to apply to a backup specialty?

A Worried Candidate

 


 

Answer To How To Deal With The Score Drop And More!

I wouldn’t throw in the towel quite yet. You have to remember that there are so many factors other than board scores to add to the equation of getting into a radiology residency. Moreover, many residencies use a cutoff of 220 or higher on the step one exam. So, you will most likely get a decent number of interviews as long as your other application credentials are OK. (not having those I could not tell you where to apply)

Also, you are right about the COMLEX scores. Most programs do not care much for those scores because it is harder to compare to everyone else taking the USMLE examination. So, I don’t believe that it will change your chances of acceptance all that much.

Finally, being a DO does not hurt your application as much as it had in the past. Now, the ACGME and the AOA are one organization, so you are no longer as much of a “second class medical citizen.”

One more critical point about your personal statement that you mentioned: I would not be so keen to address the score drop. (unless there was some major life crisis that could have affected your entire application). It would call more unnecessary attention to your board scores. To begin with, really, your step I score was not so bad. Instead, it shows that you have the potential to pass the core exam. (what most residency directors care about) Your personal statement would better serve you by talking about all the other issues that I discuss in my blog called How To Create A Killer Radiology Residency Personal Statement. Make sure to read or reread it before submitting your residency personal statement.

 

 

Let me know how everything goes,

Barry Julius, MD

 

Posted on

Poor Step I USMLE Scores- What Do I Do?

USMLE Step I

Hello Dr. Barry Julius, 

Question About Step I USMLE Scores And Application:

I am a foreign medical graduate that finished Med School in 2016. During this 2 years I’ve been studying and taking the USMLE steps, I took my step I USMLE and got an unsatisfactory score of 209 for multiple reasons. Then, I took my step II CS, passed the first attempt, and received a step II CK score of 250. I have an upcoming paid rotation (very hard to find in radiology) in a large city for 3 months starting in February 2019. Unfortunately, I don’t see myself doing anything else than radiology. Since I grew up with it and came from a family full of radiologists back home, this is what I see myself doing and breathing.

Am I dreaming about getting into a radiology residency? Or, is it possible and should I keep on pursuing it? I have all the upcoming months to make my application stronger and more appealing to apply in 2019. I am thinking about taking the step 3 USMLE if that would help my application. However, I have heard mixed opinions about completing it before applying. Also, I don’t have any research. Moreover, I have also found conflicting information on the importance of research for radiology applications.

I would really love to enter a radiology residency but I want to keep it real. Can I have your professional opinion on whether it will be possible. Also, what should I do this time to improve my chances. Or, should I just wake up and look for another option?

Thank you very much for your response,

Concerned Applicant

Answer:

Honestly, since you are a foreign grad, a score of 209 on Step I USMLE may limit your ability to obtain interviews. However, some programs may still give you one because you did so well on the step II exam. I think it is worthwhile to attempt the application process. You never know. But, I agree that it may be very challenging for you this year. You should temper your expectations for getting into a radiology residency.

In terms of the USMLE series, in your case, I would probably consider taking the USMLE Step III and try to ace the examination. A good score would confirm that the initial Step I exam results were a fluke. But, be careful. If you perform poorly on it, you can ruin your application. So, you need to study hard! (Not that I expect that you wouldn’t do so)

Also, it is often just as competitive to get into a prelim year prior to starting radiology residency. All foreign grads need a clinical year in an ACMGE certified program in the United States. So, make sure that you also apply for this as well. Foreign clinical programs are not a substitute.

Finally, as I’ve told some other foreign grads before, you need to make sure that you get to know the program director at the site of your paid rotation, This will help you get your foot in the door for an interview at least at that site. Also, this person can be a great resource to find a way to get involved in radiology research that can also bolster your application. Potentially, this person can also give you a good recommendation. That would help as well.
Let me know if you have any other questions,

Regards,

Barry Julius , MD

Follow-up Question:

Thank you very much for your answer.  I have to apply to both programs at the same time, meaning the first categorical year and radiology at the same time. Is that correct? Is there a possibility to start a separate IM program and then transfer after the first year to radiology?

I think it’s a little bit easier to get into internal medicine residency for the IMG. And, some programs require a lower Step 1 grade. As per your advice, I will definitely take the step III before applying and try to complete some research. It is hard to find, but hopefully, during my upcoming rotation, I can get my hands on something. 

Finally, I forgot to mention that I have a U.S. residency. So, I think that would improve my chances a little bit since I have seen lots of programs not interested in sponsoring VISAS, is this correct? I just want to make my case as strong as possible when applying to improve my chances, but I’m also considering internal medicine residency as another possibility because of my bad STEP 1 grade. 

Thanks again for your reply,
Concerned Applicant

Follow Up Answer:

It is possible to start a separate internal medicine program and then transfer over to radiology. However, I would recommend applying to both a preliminary clinical year and the categorical program as well as the three-year IM program. But, I would make sure to rank the categorical radiology and prelim clinical year programs first. You should be able to use the IM three year program as a backup if all else fails.

And, I agree. U.S. residency will help you a bit to secure a residency slot. It’s one less problem for the residency programs to worry about when you apply.


Good luck!

Barry Julius, MD

Posted on

Cracking the Radiology Residency Application Code

application

Most medical students and residents do not have an insider’s insight into radiology residency and fellowship application and interview processes. Even worse, misleading advice and rumors cloud the process. One needs only to look at the average student or residency forum to see numerous conflicting stories and statements.

Only someone actively involved in the process can understand what you need to know when applying for a radiology residency. So, thankfully, you have come to the right post. I have looked at thousands of applications and interviewed hundreds of residents for positions in our program as associate program director. So, I will help you out by delving into the depths of the radiology residency application process. This article will give you the basics of what you need to know.

The Application

We could go through the application in one of many ways. But, I think the best way is to go through the different parts of the application from most to least important. This way, you will not squander your energy on the small stuff!

The Dean’s Letter

Few sections of the application genuinely differentiate one applicant from another. Dean’s letters happen to be one of those items. The reason for that: you will receive comments from attendings, residents, nurses, technologists, and secretaries that may say something negative. I can’t tell you how often we have parsed an entire application with glowing positives until we arrive at the Dean’s letter. And, then we receive coded messages in the letter, such as: was very shy during the rotation, but did see some improvement. Or, this resident was very independent. However, he did not seek help when presented with a challenging patient care issue. And so forth.

Additionally, the Dean’s letter is the only document (other than the boards) that compares the applicants to their classmates. Most medical schools have buzzwords indicating the residents’ rank in their class. Each one is different, but typically it allows insight into which quartile the resident resides.

Can You Do Anything About The Dean’s Letter?

Ok, so you have your Dean’s letter written in “stone.” And, at some institutions, you may hear that administrators say you cannot change the Dean’s letter. But usually, at the bare minimum, you can check the Dean’s letter. All medical students applying for a residency should scan their Dean’s Letter before sending out the application. I have seen Dean’s letters sent on behalf of medical schools with the wrong applicant’s information!

At other institutions, you can look at your letter before application time and potentially modify the document. If that is the case, you should undoubtedly check it for any hostile or questionable comments. And then, if possible, confront the department/person that wrote the statement. Ask if they could redact or modify it. If the writer is truthful, the person may decide to leave it there. But an attempt should be made, as this one negative comment can make the difference between high, low, or no ranking on a program’s rank list. Not infrequently, the admissions committees will obsess over one questionable comment. They will often spend countless painful hours perseverating over these “minor details.”

The institution may not allow you to look at the Dean’s letter at a few medical schools. But the school may allow your mentor or a faculty member to look at the document and possibly edit it for corrections. I can’t emphasize enough how important it is to increase your odds of being accepted to the residency of your choice.

The Boards/USMLE

Why are the boards important? Well, the boards/USMLE assess the ability of a future resident to pass the radiology certification examinations. We have noticed a strong correlation between lower board scores and difficulty passing the new core exam in our program. So, similar to our program, most programs take the USMLE score very seriously.

In addition, programs use board scores more as a baseline cutoff. Once you score higher than that baseline, it doesn’t factor much into the ranking equations. On the other hand, unless extenuating circumstances exist, failing and low scores usually place the application in the deny pile.

What About COMLEX?

For those of you that are D.O. medical school applicants, I recommend that you take the USMLE in addition to the COMLEX examination. Many radiology programs are unsure of the significance of COMLEX scores and don’t know how to factor the scores into the ranking equations/cutoffs. Applications with COMLEX scores alone may get thrown out of the interview pile entirely.

Gamesmanship

Even with all these factors, you can use some gamesmanship when it comes to the boards. If you have done very well in the step 1 boards, often, you may be able to get away with just sending those scores alone. You may want to delay taking step 2 USMLE. With high USMLE Step 1 scores, USMLE step 2 scores can only hurt you if they are lower. Of course, all this gamesmanship will disappear when the scores no longer exist on Step 1. At that point, Step 2 scores will most likely replace the outcomes on Step 1.

Finally, most programs look for/expect improvement from step 1 to step 2, especially with borderline step 1 scores. So be careful and take the step 2 boards very seriously. Invest in a review course if you need to.

Research

Nowadays, research can become a significant factor in getting an interview in a residency program. What is the reason for that? ACGME guidelines mandate that accredited radiology residencies have specific radiology research requirements for residents before graduating. Knowing that a resident has completed multiple quality research projects means that a resident can work more independently completing research projects. This knowledge of research reduces the burdens upon the department.

Furthermore, radiology research may demonstrate significant interest in the field. And, it provides an avenue for discussion during interviews later on in the process. We often look at an application, saying it’s pretty good, but the resident hasn’t completed any research. That may take the application down a few rungs.

Bottom line, though. It won’t take you entirely out of the running for getting a spot. However, it can be a significant asset in some situations.

Extracurricular activities

We look for two big red flags to avoid on this section of your application: those applicants that emphasize that they have participated in every extracurricular activity under the sun and those applicants who write down almost nothing. A resident who participates in everything suggests that he lacks focus, never investigating or accomplishing tasks in depth. On the other hand, a resident that engages in nothing but school tends not to be well rounded. These residents may not have outlets to disperse their frustrations during their four years of training. A residency director does not like having frustrated residents!

Impressive Extracurriculars

So what are some activities that impress the admission committee? : Interesting extracurriculars that show leadership potential, activities that demonstrate a depth of involvement, and activities that offer an ability to handle stressful situations and function independently. Some of the special extracurriculars that stand out in my mind that meet these criteria would be a student that started a Subway franchise successfully from scratch and made it into a big business, a student that participated in the Olympics, and a student that lobbied for Congress. These are people that tend to climb the rank list higher because their extracurriculars were memorable.

Not So Memorable Extracurriculars

What are some extracurriculars that don’t add much to the application? Those activities that everyone else does and do not suggest leadership potential. In radiology, those would include participating in a radiology club (Big deal!), participating in health fairs (Every medical student does it), and teaching inner-city kids (We see it all the time as part of medical school curricula!) Not that these activities are harmful, but they don’t add much at all to your application. My recommendation to you: find something you enjoy, hopefully, something unique, and stick with it during your four years of medical school training!

Recommendations

Admissions committees like to make a big deal about recommendations. You’ll undoubtedly hear that you need an excellent letter to get into a great program. But honestly, if you ask someone for a recommendation, it is unusual to find someone who will write you a nasty one. Students are going to ask attending physicians that like them. On the other hand, although rare, we see a “bad” recommendation as a significant red flag. It often means the resident that obtained the letter has a poor emotional intelligence quotient. Or she couldn’t find one attending that liked them- both significant issues!!!

Like the rare bad recommendation, great recommendations that raise the application within the pile to a higher rank are also unusual. For the most part, this type of recommendation stems from well-known entities that want the person in their program. Or perhaps, it comes from a close colleague that the radiology admissions committee implicitly trusts.

Recommendations rank relatively low in the application influence equation given the rare ability to change the application disposition.

The Personal Statement

Finally, I would like to talk about the item that medical students often perseverate on the most: the personal statement. The personal statement seldom helps an applicant and can occasionally hurt an applicant. After having read over a thousand of them, there are very few standouts. And, almost all of those that stood out were somewhat disturbing. I still remember an essay that emphasized a dead rabbit. It did not have any correlation to radiology whatsoever. I was concerned about mental illness in that student. We terminated the possibility of acceptance to our program immediately!

If I had to say one thing, I would advise you to be cohesive and relevant to your future career as a radiologist. Also, watch out for typos because typos suggest an inattentive personality, not a characteristic you want in a radiologist. Other than that, don’t fret too much about this part of the application.

Summary

Application for radiology is an arduous process with multiple pitfalls. Make sure you concentrate on those items that give you the most “bang for your buck” to send your application higher on the rank list. In particular, put particular emphasis on the Dean’s letter. Check it if you can. Correct it if need be.

And finally, don’t be that student with marginal board scores, no research, dull or no extracurriculars, poor recommendations, and a personal statement that stands out too much. If you follow my suggestions and try not to rock the boat, you should get into a great residency!

 

 

 


Posted on

USMLE Step III- An Impediment For Radiologists?

Over the past few years, we have been witnessing a new phenomenon that I don’t think is unique to our diagnostic radiology residency program. Incoming residents are either delaying or failing their USMLE Step III examinations. Some of this new reality may be related to the decreased competitiveness of radiology. However, what is interesting is that some of the residents that fail or delay the examination are not toward the bottom of their respective classes but rather are high performing residents with a good fund of background knowledge in radiology. That got me thinking. What is going on with the new USMLE Step III examination? And, should the examination be a prequalifying factor for obtaining medical licensure prior to becoming a radiologist?

According to the USMLE Step III website, “Step 3 content reflects a data-based model of generalist medical practice in the United States. The test items and cases reflect the clinical situations that a general, as-yet undifferentiated, physician might encounter within the context of a specific setting. Step 3 provides a final assessment of physicians assuming independent responsibility for delivering general medical care.”

If you actually take apart the content of this summary statement of the Step III boards, you will see that the goal of the examination is in no way applicable to the intellectual goals/medical knowledge necessary for being a good radiologist. Based on the responses of many of my residents that have already taken the test, the questions, and content of the test have limited applicability to the practice of radiology. Very few questions are radiology related and have clinical scenarios that would ever be useful background information for a radiology resident/radiologist. So, is it really warranted to have radiology residents pass such an exam in order to practice their specialty? What is its utility?

Furthermore, the concept of having an intern that trains for one year and practices independent medicine is outdated, to say the least. Almost no hospital or clinic would ever hire a physician without some sort of complete residency training in a specialty whether it be internal medicine, psychiatry, or radiation oncology, let alone radiology. The liability of a hiring physician without this training would be enormous. I, for one, would never let any of my family members see a physician with one year of internship training who had merely passed the Step III USMLE examination.

More relevant to us, radiologists and other subspecialists never practice independent general medical care. The clinical situations that undifferentiated physicians encounter is very different from the needs of subspecialist radiologists. So, why prepare a physician for an end goal that he or she is never going to realize?

All these issues, bring me to this final conclusion. Maybe we consider creating a new examination that is actually going to be relevant to the goals of the subspecialist and not the general practitioner. Perhaps, we should create two separate exams, one with a general pathway and the other with the subspecialty pathway in mind. At least, you would create a test with increased relevancy and with a practical end goal for the individual subspecialist that would help with their future career requirements.

It is time to rethink the requirements for resident physicians obtaining medical licensure since the present concept of practicing independent care as a physician after one year is outdated and dangerous. And, subspecialists have different needs from general practitioners. With that, the Step III examination should change accordingly.