Posted on

RSNA 2018 Meeting: What Residents Should Expect From Artificial Intelligence?

By far, the RSNA is the largest and most publicized radiology meeting of the year. But, I usually attend other meetings instead because so much goes on at once at the RSNA that it is next to impossible to concentrate on one area. Moreover, to get from one side of the Mccormick conference center to the other takes almost 10-15 minutes!

In any case, for the first time in eight years, I bit the bullet and decided to attend the RSNA meeting this year. Partly, I needed additional CME credits, but also I was not able to participate in the SNMMI meeting due to timing. But, I am delighted that I did. Why? It allowed me to grasp the most current themes in radiology that exist today. And, for residents, in particular, I thought it was critical to share with all of you what may be coming down the pike.

To start with, if I had to give one overarching theme from the conference, I would have to say that the central idea was artificial intelligence. Some of these revelations about artificial intelligence were not all that critical. But, others will play an enormous role in your careers down the road. So, I will try to emphasize those items from the conference that will undoubtedly influence your career. And, I will briefly talk about a few issues that the AI companies and academic sorts may overhype.

Strong AI Career Influences

Integration

When you pull up your PACS system to read cases ten or twenty years down the road, no longer will you have to pull up your history, labs, pathology, priors, EHR, and films separately. Instead, all hospitals and outpatient offices will have software and systems that will allow you to sort through all the information at once. Right now, some institutions are more integrated than others. For most of you, lack of integration this will become a relic of the past. Walking through the technical exhibits, you could see many solutions today that will allow the radiologists of the future to read films with all the clinical information at your fingertips.

Triage

Imagine having a helper sort through films to determine which ones you should look at first and others that can wait a bit. Well, now they have multiple software packages that use deep learning to create work lists that make sense. And other programs try to detect STAT findings such as brain bleeds to make sure that radiologists read these studies first. Finally, other software programs can make sure that the correct radiologists are reading the appropriate studies. Right now, most practices do not have the staff to scrutinize cases before dictation. So, all these AI solutions, will allow more efficient and appropriate reading of STAT and essential studies.

Reducing noise

Having stopped at numerous vendors, I noticed that most of the big ones were touting deep learning algorithms to increase the quality of images. What do I mean by that? Many had sophisticated programs that mitigated artifacts and increased conspicuity of lesions and vessels. Some allowed you to image patients with significantly lower contrast dosage to prevent acute renal failure. Motion artifact on a CT scan or PET-CT scan may become a rarity. The future in this arena is now!

Increasing Reading Efficiency And Quality

Right now, some companies have created Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) packages that assist the radiologist in reading images. At the meeting, these solutions seemed to emphasize lung nodules and mammography.  I would expect some improvement over the coming years in these imaging modalities. And, I think we will begin to see other imaging modalities that utilize CAD. CAD will continue to reduce the time and effort that goes into reading studies.

One of the new types of CAD that I thought would be of help to the average radiologist was a bone age reader. It’s the perfect place for AI to begin because medical liability is a bit lower.

Additionally, new software packages can integrate CAD functions into the current dictation and PACS systems. We will see a lot more integration to improve radiologist reading efficiency.

Weaker AI Career Influences

Radiology 3.0

As much as the RSNA academics liked to state that we will no longer be image-centric and instead become patient-centric, I don’t see many powerful economic and political factors to drive the current radiology business in that direction. Currently, I am a bit skeptical about the rate of progress toward that goal. I have a feeling we will still have considerable time pressures to get tons of cases out rapidly.  Until fee for service no longer becomes relevant, radiologists will not have the time to see each patient after reading their chest film. It’s just not realistic. However, we will have more information at our fingertips about our patients’ care to make better reports and decisions. But seeing a patient after reading each film is a pipe dream.

Driving Direct Patient Care

In one of the plenary sessions, a computer scientist gave a whole lecture on improving metrics such as hand washing and patient falls with artificial intelligence. She discussed placing sensors all around the hospital to create a virtual environment that can sense these events to improve patient morbidity and mortality. While I agree that we should try to improve these issues since they cause harm to patients, the lecturer did not convince me that hospitals and institutions are ready to spend the money and time to accomplish these goals. For the foreseeable future, I see too many financial and legal hurdles to extrapolate these ideas to a larger scale.

Artificial Intelligence And The RSNA- Final Take Home Messages

Artificial intelligence will have a profound effect upon all of our careers, for better or for worse. But, the younger generations of radiologists have more to gain and more to lose. Therefore, for residents, especially, it is critical to follow the developments within the field. And, the RSNA meeting is just the right place to get a sense of AI and your future. If you have an opportunity to attend a meeting like the RSNA, it is well worth it. Take advantage of the event and learn about how the main themes will affect your career!

Posted on

AUR Meeting 2018- Themes And Undercurrents

Welcome to the second annual review of the Association Of University Radiologists meeting in 2018! So, why do I think we should review this meeting on an annual basis? Well, for one, many of the changes in residency you will experience stem from the academic realm.

Moreover, if you were to read the headlines and the summary of the lecture topics of the conference alone you would not get a good sense of what they will be changing. For example, this year, the heading of the meeting states “Health And Well-Being Of Profession And The Professional”. However, this theme is a small part of what actually happened at the meeting.

Yes, the lecturers did cover the topics of burnout and depression, relevant to the heading. But, if you dig a little bit deeper, compared to these themes, you would recognize that many other themes will impact future residents much more. So, what are the undercurrents that were most relevant? Basically, I am going to divide these topics as follows: continued improvement of the job market, increasing radiology residency match competition, the online longitudinal assessment, Radexam, and increasing time requirements for program directors.

The Hot Improving Radiology Job Market

Out of all the news, I think this is probably the most important. Based upon the hot topics lecture series at the AUR meeting, radiology has climbed out of its doldrums and now returns to a more normal job market. In the most recent year, over 1800 positions were available for new graduates. Very recently, the number of new hires amounted to the low 1100-1300. Furthermore, according to the conference, next year they predict that practices will need 2133 new hires. So, workforce demands are significantly increasing. My reasoning for the sudden increase in available jobs: a wave of retirements and willingness of practices to hire due to stable/good economic conditions. So, congratulations to all residents who chose radiology over the past 4-5 years! You can look forward to a great job market.

Continued Increasing Competitiveness Of Diagnostic Radiology Residency

Similar to the previous year, the competitiveness of radiology residency in the match continues to increase. As in the previous year, the unfilled spots continues to decrease and the percentage of US grads entering radiology residency continues to increase. All of these signs point to a much more difficult time for the US and foreign grads to match in radiology.

Online Longitudinal Assessment Replacing 10 Year Exam

Yes, I know that many of you have not yet thought about the maintenance of certification requirements once you have completed your residency. However, this new program will impact all residents today once you graduate and become board certified. No longer will ABR diplomates need to take an exam every 10 years to maintain certification (unless you do not satisfy the requirements of the new program). Rather, everyone who takes the online assessment will be able to skip the test and simply answer weekly questions that you receive via email.

Each year you will receive 104 question opportunities and you can choose to answer as few as 52 per year. You need to pass the scoring performance criteria based on 200 questions every 4 years. Fortunately, this system will replace the time sink of having to attend a test in Chicago every 10 years with all its expenses. I am certainly looking forward to bagging my unnecessary trip to Chicago for the recertification examination!

Radexam Now Operational

For residency programs throughout the country, many have implemented the new Radexam, replacing the old in-service examination. From my experience, the old in-service examination served a futile role in evaluating residents over the 4 years of residency. I believe no correlation existed between the passage of the core examination and the in-service exam. Now, this fact may change. The new Radexam crowdsources questions from numerous question writers throughout the country. And, the questions are vetted and evaluated for validity. In addition, the exam tests residents according to individual residency level. They can be used at the end of a rotation. Eventually, the exams can be tailored toward the types of rotations the radiology residency has (modality or organ based). I look forward to evaluating the quality of this new exam. More importantly, I believe it has the potential to revolutionize evaluation of residents, especially at smaller programs.

Increased Mandated Program Director Time Requirements Officially Implemented Starting July 1, 2018

Especially at the smaller programs like ours, the new ACGME rules about program director minimum time requirements will create an enormous impact on the management of residency programs throughout the country. Check out this webpage from the ACGME and the associated chart below:

https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/420_DiagnosticRadiology_2018-07-01.pdf?ver=2017-08-10-081454-583

0.3 full-time equivalent (FTE) for programs approved for eight to 15 residents; (Core)
0.4 FTE for programs approved for 16 to 23 residents; (Core)
0.5 FTE for programs approved for 24 to 31 residents; (Core)
0.6 FTE for programs approved for 32 to 39 residents; (Core)
0.7 FTE for programs approved for 40 to 47 residents; (Core)
0.8 FTE for programs approved for 48 to 55 residents; (Core)
0.9 FTE for programs approved for 56 to 63 residents; (Core)
1.0 FTE for programs approved for 64 to 71 residents; (Core)
1.1 FTE for programs approved for 72 or more residents. (Core)

 

Basically, the minimum required time for program directors to administrate programs has in many cases doubled. At our program, we are going from a 0.2 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) (one day of administration time per week) to a 0.4 FTE (two days of administration time per week). As many programs have suffered from lack of administration time for programs directors, this change should enhance the quality of many radiology residencies. Some manpower/administrative issues that remained unresolved in radiology residencies can now be tackled due to decreased time pressures.

Final Thoughts About The AUR Meeting

Unlike previous meetings over the past four or five years, most of the doom and gloom has passed. Ironically, although the headline lectures were about depression and burnout, the mood was much more upbeat for new and graduating residents. Between the rising job market and the stable economy, the new MOC, increased program director time requirements, and the new Radexam, things are looking up. Even the wave of concerns about artificial intelligence replacing radiologist has seemed to pass us by! (No one believes that it will replace radiologists any time soon).  So, for all radiology residents, you are entering the field at a great time. And, this meeting certainly confirmed my suspicions!