Posted on

What Was Radiology Life Like Without PACS?

without pacs

I may be dating myself, but I am the last generation that did a radiology residency without PACS. Yes. I lived and breathed the pre PACs era. Some of it was pretty good. And, other parts of it, not so much.

Nevertheless, radiology was very different before hospitals started to add these systems to their networks. So, what are some of the most significant changes I have seen throughout my career when I compare the two eras? What was life like before the advent of PACS? Let’s go through some of the most critical differences in radiology.

Many More Films Got Lost Without PACS

On any given night, you would expect a good percentage of cases to remain in absentia without a dictation. Unsurprisingly, the orthopedic surgery residents would stealthily slip into the reading room when the radiology resident stepped out. And this person would steal the films so that the surgeons could use them for orthopedic surgeries at nighttime. Or, the alternators (the old defunct machines that you might see in the back of a reading room somewhere nowadays) would suck up several films, and they would get lost in the device or even shredded to pieces. Many cases would simply no longer be available for dication either for a delayed period or never. Film loss was just a fact of life. Nowadays, it is only the rare irretrievable case that you will need some help with from the IT folks.

Saw A Lot More Clinicians

Today, our reading rooms fill up with primarily residents and a smattering/skeleton crew of a couple of attendings. Back in the day, the reading room was hustling and bustling. Surgeons, Ob-Gyns, and more would regularly show up to look at their cases with you because they couldn’t look at them themselves on a PACS system. You got to know each clinician by name and personality. It was more than just a tryst in the reading room. Of course, that came with the upside of meeting great physicians and the downside of discovering a few jerks here and there. Nevertheless, the reading was much less of a lonely place. And, you would learn about the final disposition of cases more often because we kept in close contact with our physician brethren.

Had To Produce Your Films For Case Conferences

Have any of you ever encountered a dark room? Back in the day, it was a regular event for radiologists. We would have to develop our copies to present for case conferences. It was a big deal and somewhat time-consuming. But, we all got to know this haven of darkness every so often. It was much more intricate than just downloading a case on PACS or snapping a picture on an iPhone for a presentation on a Powerpoint. These technologies were available but still uncommonly used at the end of the pre-PACS era. It was a pain in the-you-know-what!

Priors Were Less Common

Getting priors was a real pain in the neck back then. We would somehow have to go down to the file room and retrieve them. Therefore, we would dictate many more cases without them because they could be hard to come by. So, you could imagine we lost some specificity and sensitivity in these dictations. And, then, when you did retrieve the priors, you would receive these enormous folders where you had to find suitable films. You would be lucky if you didn’t get a paper cut in the process. (They were much more prevalent back then and hurt like hell!)

Less Windows Available Without PACS

Nowadays, we click a button and re-window a case. Back then, you couldn’t look at the bones if you didn’t have the bone windows on film. So, the techs would print fewer windows to save on film. Often, if the reason for the study had nothing to do with the window, you would not have them available to read. I’m sure we missed tons of osseous lesions!

Keep Lists Of Results On Overnight Cases

Instead of having a PACS system to look cases up, we would have to keep a running tab of the patient studies we read, especially on CT rotation. Clinicians would come down and check out the results on the list and chat with the resident. Every room would have a list of cases from the previous night. Eventually, they would make their way onto the Radiology Information System. But until then, the responsibility was ours to keep tabs on everything in the reading room.

Working From Home, Ha!

And finally, working from home was a figment of one’s imagination. We needed to perform all reads and procedures in-house. Imagine being unable to take off to let the Verizon folks fix something in the house. That was our world. We lived and breathed the hospital in those days!

Radiology Life Without PACS

We lived in a different world back then. Radiology lifestyle and culture have changed dramatically over the years since hospitals have installed PACS. Yes, we had more contact with other physicians, but it came at the expense of many problems. Nevertheless, although mostly better today, some good did happen before hospitals introduced PACS to our world. Would I want to go back to those times? Probably not. But they were a great experience that new radiologists cannot imagine today!

Posted on

Is Nuclear Medicine A Dying Field?

dying field

Question About Nuclear Medicine As A Dying Field:

Hi Dr. Julius!

What is the future of nuclear radiology? I have seen some programs that offer dual certification pathways within their DR residencies. Is that worth it? I’ve also heard it’s a bit of a dying field, thoughts?

Also, is therapeutic nuclear radiology becoming a feasible pathway for radiology grads? On paper, it sounds fantastic to use radionucleotides to not only diagnose but also treat patients.

Thank you!


Answer:

Once again, an excellent question from one of my readers!

Well, I have a lot of opinions on this topic since I am first and foremost a nuclear radiologist. And I am happy to share them with you!

Nuclear Medicine History/Background

You first have to start by understanding the history of the specialty. Nuclear medicine is one of the oldest subspecialties in radiology. It came about before ultrasound and was once the only other high tech modality for radiologists other than x-rays. So, back in the old days, probably around 50 years ago or so, a lot of really smart radiologist went into the field. And, at that time, the area was distinct from the rest of the radiology field. So, they formed a separate board society and training programs “unattached” to radiology residency in addition to a fellowship after residency. Fast forward to our time, and you have a bit of a mess. Most applicants to nuclear medicine would prefer to get into radiology because you can do so much more. You have much better job prospects because the radiology training is so much more diverse.

The Split

But, this current organization of two separate radiology and nuclear medicine creates a problem. Generally, the folks that are only nuclear medicine need more to do than just reading nuclear medicine studies during the daytime. Most practices do not have enough work to support a nuclear radiologist. So, enter the new dichotomy. There are those nuclear medicine physicians who train primarily in radiology that, in general, prefer to do the diagnostic radiology work along with diagnostic nuclear medicine. And then, some are only nuclear medicine trained that need to create a new livelihood for themselves. And one of those areas is the realm of nuclear medicine treatment. In general, right now, these procedures do not pay well and are very time-consuming. However, these nuclear medicine physicians provide an essential service by administering the radioactive pharmaceuticals and following up the patients over time.

I believe in the future; the specialty will split into these two entities- diagnostics and treatment- because of the current mechanics of reimbursement and what procedures that nuclear medicine docs and nuclear radiologists can perform.

Is Nuclear Medicine A Dying Field?

Finally, to complete the answer to your question, diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine are very active in research and new radiopharmaceuticals coming in for clinical use. So, nuclear medicine is certainly not a dying field. But, who performs what is changing. Of course, there is some overlap. For instance, I perform radioactive iodine treatments and do pretty much all diagnostics. But, I don’t do any of the Lutithera or Xofigo treatments or others available to the public. And, there are all variations in between. Nevertheless, nuclear medicine is an excellent specialty for someone who wants an exciting radiology subspecialty and likes to practice general radiology (Which is what I do!)

That is my long-winded answer to your question (I could have even gone on for longer but had to stop somewhere!)

Dr. Barry Julius


By the way, for those of you interested in a book for nuclear medicine, I would highly recommend the Mettler book. I used it to study for my recertification examination! (I am an Amazon affiliate and receive a commission)

Posted on

Top 10 Radiology Anachronisms Today From 1999

radiology anachronisms

Since I started my radiology residency in 1999 (only 23 years ago!), a whirlwind of changes has morphed the field of radiology into something very different from when I first started. It’s amazing how new modalities, technologies, and techniques creep up on us, gradually replacing the old ways. That got me thinking… Since everyone loves lists, what are the top 10 radiology anachronisms from 1999 that would be out of place today? Don’t worry… I’m not going back to the 1950s when pneumoencephalography reigned king because that was not my time. (And most of yours as well!) Instead, let’s start with some of the significant changes for general radiologists from the more recent past (Hopefully after you were born!). I think you might find this enlightening. Enjoy!

Analog Films/Film Panels

When I first started, I hit upon the end of the physical film era. Fortunately, I was one of the last classes to experience the dusk of its usage. Soon after, I graduated residency and never looked back in the world of film. Boy, did that change how we practice radiology!

Pulmonary Arteriograms and Trauma Aortograms

I will lump these two studies into one category because they are invasive diagnostic studies. For those of you that remember, the experts considered pulmonary angiograms for years to be the “gold standard.” Now, we only use chest CTAs. Wow, did that change in a huff with the newer CT technology! And, what about the trauma aortogram? Do you remember getting woken up at 3 AM to rule out aortic rupture? I certainly do!

Misplaced Imaging Studies

For those of you who experienced the film era, you will remember orthopedics taking a good percentage of studies down for surgery, never crossing the path of the radiologist’s eyes. How often does that happen now? Very rarely do films get lost on PACS!

Double Contrast Barium Enemas

In New Jersey, finding the equipment you need to complete a double contrast barium enema is almost impossible. And many residents have never even seen one performed. Incredible isn’t it?! Almost everyone seems to get a colonoscopy or virtual colonoscopy instead. It’s ironic because double-contrast barium enemas played an essential role in cancer screening. No longer!

Written Prelims

Most newer radiologists and residents can’t even picture writing a prelim, let alone writing anything down. That is just how we used to operate in 1999 as residents. We would hang the CT scan boards and then write our impressions on paper in a binder. How passé?

Clinicians in the Radiology Department

I remember when the radiology department bustled with activity from the surgeons and oncologists. Rarely does that happen anymore? Sure, you still get that occasional straggler that enters the room. But, that is more the exception rather than the rule. Too bad, huh?

PET Scanners Without CT

When I started, the debate about whether PET-CT would provide a significant added benefit over a standard PET scanner raged. Well, that debate ended rather quickly! I don’t think I’ve seen a traditional PET scanner around for a while!

Transcriptionists And Cassette Recorders

It’s next to impossible to forget about the changes in dictation technologies over the past 19 years. Granted, I don’t think that the technologies have gone far enough. However, a lot has still changed. I haven’t spoken to a transcriptionist or dictated into a cassette recorder for eons!

IVPs and Ionized Iodinated Contrast

Who can remember having to inject your patients for IVP with iodinated ionized contrast, no less? I do! The pain from an infiltrated dosage was immense. And, I can remember a lot more untoward allergic reactions. Well, fortunately, this is no more!

Absent Hospital CT Techs After Hours

Absent CT techs certainly would not fly at most hospitals anymore. Hospitals expect CT scanners to run at all hours, no matter the case’s urgency. I almost can’t imagine a hospital without 24-hour CT coverage. It makes me miss the old days!

Final Thoughts on Radiology Anachronisms Today From 1999

These radiology anachronisms are probably just the tip of the iceberg. And, I am sure you have your ideas about what would be an anachronism today from 1999. So much has changed! I would love to hear from you to find out what you think are some of the top radiology anachronisms. If you have a good one, please comment below!