Posted on

How Much Detailed Description Belongs In Your Report As A Resident?

detailed description

Exceptionally few things can be more confusing as a resident than how much to put in a report. Each faculty member tells you something slightly different. Some want every little detailed description. And others want a dictation that is so short it may even skip over some of the relevant findings. Since the diverse dictations you read are so vast, and each attending does it differently, the variety of recommendations you receive is also all over the map. So, how do you decide what kind of dictation detail is right for you? Well, let me give you some pointers.

Don’t Get Too Deep Into The Weeds

Like I did when I started, I had noticed that many new radiologists would get into the nitty-gritty of the technical aspects of a dictation while forgetting about the ultimate desired result. We shoot for an answer to a question that the referrer is providing. And that is the main reason for the report itself. So, when you see a dictation continuing to harp on T1 and T2 weighting as well subtle points of artifacts and the finer points of a description that no one will use (including the subsequent radiologist that reads the report), it is probably too much. These reports typically have an impression that is a mile long and a result section that needs a table of contents! So, avoid too much technical jargon description.

Keep It A Little Bit Longer With More Detailed Description Than Your Attending- 

At the same time, for most attendings, you probably want to make sure that your dictation is a little bit longer than they would write. Why? Because your faculty precisely knows what the clinician needs from a report and the audience they are writing to address. You don’t know these factors as well. So, it pays to describe a little more than what they would place in their dictation. Additionally, as most attendings do, you should use the dictation as a guide so that you won’t forget what to add to your final note.

Make Sure All The Relevant Findings Are Present

If you are reading a trauma chest CT scan, make sure to put in the dictation that there is no mediastinal hematoma. That statement is probably not valuable if the patient is here for pneumonia instead. So, think about the pertinent negatives and positives you would need to rule in or rule out the diagnosis that the referring physician needs. Even if this adds a few lines to your report, it’s probably a good idea to add it because it can help to figure out the patient’s final disposition.

Be Sure To Make The Detailed Description As Objective As Possible

Objectivity trumps subjectivity any day of the week. Statements should be a matter of fact and not an opinion as much as possible. The extra vocabulary and detail that goes into a report with all the subjective phrases such as “I believe” or “appears/seems” are superfluous at best and harmful at worst. They indicate insecurity to the reading physician. And you probably know what that means! They are going to order more unnecessary tests based on your uncertainty. So, please keep your objectivity in your dictation!

After All Of That, It May Depend On Your Faculty Member

The final consideration you need to determine the length of your dictation is the faculty member reviewing your report. Unfortunately, at your stage, your dictation is not quite yet your own. So, make sure to write the specific details your attending requests. They are often apt to change whatever you finally say anyway. Therefore, make sure to do it the way they want the first time!

How Much Detailed Description Belongs In A Resident Report?

It’s a fine line between too much, too little, and just right in the resident’s report. So, please don’t go too deep into the technical jargon; keep it a little bit longer than your attending; ensure relevant positives and negatives are present; keep it objective, and remember your report is for your attending. These guideposts will eventually get your dictations to the appropriate mean that satisfies your faculty and the referrers so that they can interpret and understand your final read!

 

Posted on

Which Radiology Reporting System Should I Use?

reporting systems

Nowadays, there are so many different reporting systems: TI-RADS, PI-RADS, BI-RADS, ELCAP, Fleishner criteria, LI-RADS, and more (If you like acronyms, you are in heaven!) Sometimes, like the Fleishner criteria, LI-RADS, and ELCAP, there are multiple reporting systems for the same specialty reads. And, in our practice, we tend to use two of them for lung screenings, both the ELCAP and the Fleishner criteria. But, when you have so many systems to choose from, which ones do you choose and why? Can or should you use two different types? Here are some suggestions to make your decisions to use one reporting system over another a bit easier.

Recognize That There Is No One Right Reporting System

First of all, you need to recognize that there is no one correct answer. Each reporting system is just that, a reporting system. So, your conclusions and management can slightly differ. Even within the reporting system itself, there is a bit of wiggle room because patients don’t always follow the rule books. In my experience, I can find exceptions to almost every “rule.” For example, sometimes, you might think that they need a follow at a slightly smaller or larger interval than one year for a lung cancer screening because the patient cannot come in at a particular time. Regardless, many different systems have the potential to work for your practice. Check out all the ones that may be useful for your practice.

Decide On And Ask Your Audience

Who is referring the patients to you? Is it the pulmonologists, primary care docs, or cardiothoracic surgeons? Once you find out which is the source, then you should find out what they want. Or, at least use the type of system for which the authors have written. Why? Because they are the ones that are going to be reading your reports and deciding on patient management. Making your referrers happy is one of your top goals. If some want one type of reporting system and others wish to have another. Consider using both if your technology has the capability. It may be worth it to keep your referrers from using the practice down the street.

What Is The Simplest For You

Next, what is the most straightforward reporting system to manage? Do you have preset templates in your system that make it easier to use one reporting system over another? Or, can you do your reports freehand? What do the radiologists in your group prefer? Sometimes, these factors can be the overwhelming cause to choose one reporting system over another. Especially in the case that many of the systems could potentially work for your referrers.

Revisit The Data

Finally, once you’ve been using one or two reporting systems for a while, check how they have fared. Canvas the referrers to find out if they think the reporting and management suggestions have been reasonable. Make sure to keep up the changes within the reporting system to make sure that you are up to date. I have found that the reporting instructions for any given system have new recommendations every few years.

Also, a head-to-head comparison from time to time between the different reporting systems in terms of patient outcomes may help to decide which one to keep and which ones to chuck. This comparison can be your mini-research project or a review of the literature.

Selecting A Reporting System- The Final Decision

Arriving at a reporting system does take a bit of forethought and action. Recognize that more than one reporting system can work for you. Ask your audience and find out what works best. Utilize what makes the most sense with your system’s capabilities. And constantly check the data to make sure that your reporting systems are working as they should. Completing each of these steps will ensure that you make that you are making the right decision. Remember, reporting systems are a critical part of creating an actionable final report!